Shades of sustainability: Decoding the influence of fintech, natural resources and green ICT on CO2 emissions and green growth in China

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Resources Policy Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105275
{"title":"Shades of sustainability: Decoding the influence of fintech, natural resources and green ICT on CO2 emissions and green growth in China","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The term \"green growth\" signifies an approach toward growth that promotes environmental sustainability and economic prosperity by supporting the preservation of natural resources, energy conservation, environmentally conscious farming, and waste disposal. It aims to distinguish economic prosperity from the destruction of the environment. Similarly, the core focus of the present study is to illustrate the impact of environmental policy, fintech, green technologies, and natural resources on carbon dioxide emissions and green growth in China over a specific twenty-one-year period covering 2000 to 2021. The study objectively analyzes the effects of environmental policy, natural resources, fintech, and green technologies on CO2 emissions and green growth employing the QARDL method. By confirming the empirical outcomes, the research analyzes the reliability of the methodology. The green growth and CO2 emissions models yield distinct results about statistically significant quantile ranges and coefficient magnitudes, as demonstrated by the research's findings. Natural resources support escalating CO2 emissions, whereas environmental policy, green technologies, and finance tend to lessen the detrimental effects. Concerning these results, policy experts should concentrate on green growth to facilitate the inclusion of green energy into the banking sector while reaching the zero-carbon objective by 2050.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724006421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The term "green growth" signifies an approach toward growth that promotes environmental sustainability and economic prosperity by supporting the preservation of natural resources, energy conservation, environmentally conscious farming, and waste disposal. It aims to distinguish economic prosperity from the destruction of the environment. Similarly, the core focus of the present study is to illustrate the impact of environmental policy, fintech, green technologies, and natural resources on carbon dioxide emissions and green growth in China over a specific twenty-one-year period covering 2000 to 2021. The study objectively analyzes the effects of environmental policy, natural resources, fintech, and green technologies on CO2 emissions and green growth employing the QARDL method. By confirming the empirical outcomes, the research analyzes the reliability of the methodology. The green growth and CO2 emissions models yield distinct results about statistically significant quantile ranges and coefficient magnitudes, as demonstrated by the research's findings. Natural resources support escalating CO2 emissions, whereas environmental policy, green technologies, and finance tend to lessen the detrimental effects. Concerning these results, policy experts should concentrate on green growth to facilitate the inclusion of green energy into the banking sector while reaching the zero-carbon objective by 2050.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续性的阴影:解码金融科技、自然资源和绿色信息通信技术对中国二氧化碳排放和绿色增长的影响
绿色增长 "一词是指通过支持保护自然资源、节约能源、注重环保的耕作和废物处理,促进环境可持续性和经济繁荣的增长方式。其目的是将经济繁荣与环境破坏区分开来。同样,本研究的核心重点是说明环境政策、金融科技、绿色技术和自然资源在 2000 年至 2021 年这二十一年间对中国二氧化碳排放和绿色增长的影响。研究采用QARDL方法,客观分析了环境政策、自然资源、金融科技和绿色技术对二氧化碳排放和绿色增长的影响。通过证实实证结果,研究分析了该方法的可靠性。研究结果表明,绿色增长和二氧化碳排放模型得出了具有统计意义的量化范围和系数大小的不同结果。自然资源支持了二氧化碳排放量的增加,而环境政策、绿色技术和金融则倾向于减轻其不利影响。针对这些结果,政策专家应专注于绿色增长,以促进将绿色能源纳入银行业,同时在 2050 年前实现零碳目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
期刊最新文献
Uncertainty and entrepreneurship in oil-rich developing countries: Does institution matter? Impact of natural resource rents on global trade dynamics in RCEP: Economic and geopolitical interdependencies Asymmetric relationship between crude oil price and remittance inflows in a small island economy: Evidence from non-linear ARDL approach Institutions as a determinant of FDI and the role of natural resources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1