The association between intraoperative low driving pressure ventilation and perioperative healthcare-associated costs: A retrospective multicenter cohort study

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111567
Luca J. Wachtendorf , Elena Ahrens , Aiman Suleiman , Dario von Wedel , Tim M. Tartler , Maíra I. Rudolph , Simone Redaelli , Peter Santer , Ricardo Munoz-Acuna , Abeer Santarisi , Harold N. Calderon , Michael E. Kiyatkin , Lena Novack , Daniel Talmor , Matthias Eikermann , Maximilian S. Schaefer
{"title":"The association between intraoperative low driving pressure ventilation and perioperative healthcare-associated costs: A retrospective multicenter cohort study","authors":"Luca J. Wachtendorf ,&nbsp;Elena Ahrens ,&nbsp;Aiman Suleiman ,&nbsp;Dario von Wedel ,&nbsp;Tim M. Tartler ,&nbsp;Maíra I. Rudolph ,&nbsp;Simone Redaelli ,&nbsp;Peter Santer ,&nbsp;Ricardo Munoz-Acuna ,&nbsp;Abeer Santarisi ,&nbsp;Harold N. Calderon ,&nbsp;Michael E. Kiyatkin ,&nbsp;Lena Novack ,&nbsp;Daniel Talmor ,&nbsp;Matthias Eikermann ,&nbsp;Maximilian S. Schaefer","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>A low dynamic driving pressure during mechanical ventilation for general anesthesia has been associated with a lower risk of postoperative respiratory complications (PRC), a key driver of healthcare costs. It is, however, unclear whether maintaining low driving pressure is clinically relevant to measure and contain costs. We hypothesized that a lower dynamic driving pressure is associated with lower costs.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Multicenter retrospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Two academic healthcare networks in New York and Massachusetts, USA.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>46,715 adult surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia for non-ambulatory (inpatient and same-day admission) surgery between 2016 and 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>The primary exposure was the median intraoperative dynamic driving pressure.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>The primary outcome was direct perioperative healthcare-associated costs, which were matched with data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP–NIS) to report absolute differences in total costs in United States Dollars (US$). We assessed effect modification by patients' baseline risk of PRC (<u>s</u>core for <u>p</u>rediction <u>o</u>f postoperative <u>r</u>espiratory <u>c</u>omplications [SPORC] ≥ 7) and effect mediation by rates of PRC (including post-extubation saturation &lt; 90%, re-intubation or non-invasive ventilation within 7 days) and other major complications.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>The median intraoperative dynamic driving pressure was 17.2cmH<sub>2</sub>O (IQR 14.0–21.3cmH<sub>2</sub>O). In adjusted analyses, every 5cmH<sub>2</sub>O reduction in dynamic driving pressure was associated with a decrease of −0.7% in direct perioperative healthcare-associated costs (95%CI −1.3 to −0.1%; <em>p</em> = 0.020). When a dynamic driving pressure below 15cmH<sub>2</sub>O was maintained, -US$340 lower total perioperative healthcare-associated costs were observed (95%CI −US$546 to −US$132; <em>p</em> = 0.001). This association was limited to patients at high baseline risk of PRC (<em>n</em> = 4059; −US$1755;97.5%CI −US$2495 to −US$986; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), where lower risks of PRC and other major complications mediated 10.7% and 7.2% of this association (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 and <em>p</em> = 0.015, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Intraoperative mechanical ventilation targeting low dynamic driving pressures could be a relevant measure to reduce perioperative healthcare-associated costs in high-risk patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111567"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095281802400196X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective

A low dynamic driving pressure during mechanical ventilation for general anesthesia has been associated with a lower risk of postoperative respiratory complications (PRC), a key driver of healthcare costs. It is, however, unclear whether maintaining low driving pressure is clinically relevant to measure and contain costs. We hypothesized that a lower dynamic driving pressure is associated with lower costs.

Design

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Two academic healthcare networks in New York and Massachusetts, USA.

Patients

46,715 adult surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia for non-ambulatory (inpatient and same-day admission) surgery between 2016 and 2021.

Interventions

The primary exposure was the median intraoperative dynamic driving pressure.

Measurements

The primary outcome was direct perioperative healthcare-associated costs, which were matched with data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP–NIS) to report absolute differences in total costs in United States Dollars (US$). We assessed effect modification by patients' baseline risk of PRC (score for prediction of postoperative respiratory complications [SPORC] ≥ 7) and effect mediation by rates of PRC (including post-extubation saturation < 90%, re-intubation or non-invasive ventilation within 7 days) and other major complications.

Main results

The median intraoperative dynamic driving pressure was 17.2cmH2O (IQR 14.0–21.3cmH2O). In adjusted analyses, every 5cmH2O reduction in dynamic driving pressure was associated with a decrease of −0.7% in direct perioperative healthcare-associated costs (95%CI −1.3 to −0.1%; p = 0.020). When a dynamic driving pressure below 15cmH2O was maintained, -US$340 lower total perioperative healthcare-associated costs were observed (95%CI −US$546 to −US$132; p = 0.001). This association was limited to patients at high baseline risk of PRC (n = 4059; −US$1755;97.5%CI −US$2495 to −US$986; p < 0.001), where lower risks of PRC and other major complications mediated 10.7% and 7.2% of this association (p < 0.001 and p = 0.015, respectively).

Conclusions

Intraoperative mechanical ventilation targeting low dynamic driving pressures could be a relevant measure to reduce perioperative healthcare-associated costs in high-risk patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术中低驱动压力通气与围手术期相关医疗费用之间的关系:一项回顾性多中心队列研究
研究目的 全身麻醉机械通气期间的低动态驱动压力与术后呼吸系统并发症(PRC)的低风险相关,而这是医疗成本的主要驱动因素。然而,目前还不清楚保持低驱动压力是否与衡量和控制成本的临床相关性。我们假设较低的动态驱动压力与较低的成本相关。设计多中心回顾性队列研究。设置美国纽约和马萨诸塞州的两个学术医疗保健网络。患者2016年至2021年期间,46715名成人外科患者接受了非卧床(住院和当天入院)手术的全身麻醉。干预措施主要暴露是术中动态驱动压力中位数。测量主要结果是围术期直接医疗相关费用,这些费用与医疗成本和利用项目-全国住院患者样本(HCUP-NIS)的数据相匹配,以报告总费用的绝对差异(美元)。我们评估了患者发生PRC的基线风险(术后呼吸并发症预测评分[SPORC]≥7)对效果的影响,以及PRC发生率(包括拔管后饱和度< 90%、7天内再次插管或无创通气)和其他主要并发症对效果的影响。主要结果术中动态驱动压力的中位数为17.2cmH2O(IQR为14.0-21.3cmH2O)。在调整后的分析中,动态驱动压力每降低 5 cmH2O,围术期直接医疗相关成本就会降低 -0.7%(95%CI -1.3--0.1%;p = 0.020)。当动态血压保持在 15cmH2O 以下时,围术期医疗相关总费用会降低-340 美元(95%CI -546-132;p = 0.001)。这种关联仅限于基线 PRC 风险较高的患者(n = 4059;-1755 美元;97.5%CI -2495 美元至 -986 美元;p < 0.001),PRC 和其他主要并发症的风险较低分别占这种关联的 10.7% 和 7.2% (p < 0.结论以低动态驱动压力为目标的术中机械通气可能是降低高危患者围手术期医疗相关费用的相关措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
期刊最新文献
Oral ketamine for acute postoperative analgesia (OKAPA) trial: A randomized controlled, single center pilot study. Letter to the editor regarding "The effects of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tube on atelectasis after general anesthesia induction assessed by lung ultrasound: A randomized controlled trial". Defining standards of care for AI and clinicians alike: Regarding ChatGPT in labor analgesia management Continuation versus discontinuation of renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors before non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis Continuous vital sign monitoring on surgical wards: The COSMOS pilot
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1