Frameworks for the application of machine learning in life cycle assessment for process modeling

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Cleaner Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100221
{"title":"Frameworks for the application of machine learning in life cycle assessment for process modeling","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the face of escalating emission reduction demands and heightened public awareness, the imperative for transparent assessments is fundamental to responsible and sustainable development. The use of life cycle assessment (LCA) is instrumental in identifying environmental hotspots in intricate systems and guiding the design and selection of environmentally conscious production methods. However, LCA's comprehensive approach demands substantial data, fundamentally material and energy flows for individual materials or processes, consolidated within a life cycle inventory (LCI). The amount of time, resources, and expertise required to compile an accurate LCI dataset are among the greatest concerns for LCA practitioners. During the early design phase for industrial-scale production, process simulation is a useful tool for estimating LCI data; however, first-principle models can sometimes be unfeasible. This has prompted researchers and engineers to advocate for simplified or surrogate versions of these intricate models in some particular cases. In contrast to first-principle models, machine learning (ML) models efficiently manage extensive datasets and complex systems without rigorous model equations. This work assesses the current state of ML-LCA integration through literature and bibliometric analysis, categorizing works into three clusters and identifying publication trends. Furthermore, this analysis yielded three frameworks aimed at facilitating the integration of ML techniques into LCA workflows, enhancing precision and efficiency in environmental impact assessment. The first framework revealed the interest in abstracting a complete process into a surrogate ML model for fast LCI predictions. Conversely, the second one focused on substituting a complex part of the process for an ML surrogate model based on data from experiments or literature. Finally, in the third framework, LCA performance was directly correlated with a system characteristic, enabling direct and fast predictions of LCIs or LCA performance indicators, and optimization in not yet designed systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266678942400059X/pdfft?md5=31344a8562ec3679d3f09265e351ceec&pid=1-s2.0-S266678942400059X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266678942400059X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the face of escalating emission reduction demands and heightened public awareness, the imperative for transparent assessments is fundamental to responsible and sustainable development. The use of life cycle assessment (LCA) is instrumental in identifying environmental hotspots in intricate systems and guiding the design and selection of environmentally conscious production methods. However, LCA's comprehensive approach demands substantial data, fundamentally material and energy flows for individual materials or processes, consolidated within a life cycle inventory (LCI). The amount of time, resources, and expertise required to compile an accurate LCI dataset are among the greatest concerns for LCA practitioners. During the early design phase for industrial-scale production, process simulation is a useful tool for estimating LCI data; however, first-principle models can sometimes be unfeasible. This has prompted researchers and engineers to advocate for simplified or surrogate versions of these intricate models in some particular cases. In contrast to first-principle models, machine learning (ML) models efficiently manage extensive datasets and complex systems without rigorous model equations. This work assesses the current state of ML-LCA integration through literature and bibliometric analysis, categorizing works into three clusters and identifying publication trends. Furthermore, this analysis yielded three frameworks aimed at facilitating the integration of ML techniques into LCA workflows, enhancing precision and efficiency in environmental impact assessment. The first framework revealed the interest in abstracting a complete process into a surrogate ML model for fast LCI predictions. Conversely, the second one focused on substituting a complex part of the process for an ML surrogate model based on data from experiments or literature. Finally, in the third framework, LCA performance was directly correlated with a system characteristic, enabling direct and fast predictions of LCIs or LCA performance indicators, and optimization in not yet designed systems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习在流程建模生命周期评估中的应用框架
面对不断提高的减排要求和公众意识,透明的评估是负责任和可持续发展的基础。使用生命周期评估(LCA)有助于在错综复杂的系统中发现环境热点,并指导设计和选择具有环保意识的生产方法。然而,生命周期评估的综合方法需要大量数据,主要是在生命周期清单(LCI)中整合单个材料或工艺的材料流和能源流。编制准确的 LCI 数据集所需的时间、资源和专业知识是 LCA 从业人员最关心的问题之一。在工业规模生产的早期设计阶段,流程模拟是估算 LCI 数据的有用工具;然而,第一原理模型有时并不可行。这就促使研究人员和工程师在某些特殊情况下主张使用这些复杂模型的简化版或替代版。与第一原理模型相比,机器学习(ML)模型无需严格的模型方程,就能有效管理大量数据集和复杂系统。这项工作通过文献和文献计量分析评估了 ML-LCA 整合的现状,将作品分为三类,并确定了出版趋势。此外,该分析还得出了三个框架,旨在促进将 ML 技术集成到 LCA 工作流程中,提高环境影响评估的精度和效率。第一个框架揭示了将一个完整的过程抽象为一个代用 ML 模型以进行快速 LCI 预测的兴趣所在。与此相反,第二个框架侧重于根据实验或文献数据,用 ML 代用模型替代流程中的复杂部分。最后,在第三个框架中,生命周期评估性能与系统特性直接相关,可以直接快速地预测生命周期影响指数或生命周期评估性能指标,并对尚未设计的系统进行优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
A novel integrated material flow cost accounting (MFCA)- IoT-lean management system approach to improving water use efficiency and reducing costs in the beverage industry Eco-efficiency of coffee production and consumption in the UK at the product and sectoral levels Climate policy uncertainty and environmental degradation: Does democracy moderate this relationship? Integrated approach of waste analysis and life cycle assessment for the management of non-recyclable plastics in recycling shops Implementation and improvement of Integrated Management Systems: recommendations for their adaptation to the ISO High-Level structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1