Long-term effects of management practices on soil water, yield and water use of dryland wheat: A global meta-analysis

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE European Journal of Soil Science Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1111/ejss.13541
Muhammad Adil, Fenglin Lv, Tingting Li, Yi Chen, Isma Gul, Heli Lu, Siqi Lu, Lin Qiu
{"title":"Long-term effects of management practices on soil water, yield and water use of dryland wheat: A global meta-analysis","authors":"Muhammad Adil,&nbsp;Fenglin Lv,&nbsp;Tingting Li,&nbsp;Yi Chen,&nbsp;Isma Gul,&nbsp;Heli Lu,&nbsp;Siqi Lu,&nbsp;Lin Qiu","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil water conservation in dryland agriculture mainly depends on precipitation. We chose 35 long-term experiments and analysed the data by using meta-analysis to check how fallow management methods affect soil water storage of dryland winter wheat planting (SWS), precipitation storage efficiency (PSE), crop yield and water use efficiency (WUE). No-tillage (NT), compared to conventional tillage (CT) in the fallow period, increased PSE, SWS, grain yield and WUE by 32.9%, 27.1%, 30.5% and 22.6%, respectively. Reduced tillage (RT) and subsoil tillage (ST) increased PSE by 15.2% and 11.7%, SWS by 17.4% and 15.0% and grain yield by 15.5 and 13.8%, respectively, but these had a non-significant effect on WUE. The conservation tillage methods interacted significantly with the residue management and fallow mulching practices. Compared to CT, the conservation tillage methods with fallow mulching increased PSE, SWS, grain yield and WUE, but the growing of cover crops (designated as biological mulching) decreased PSE, SWS and grain yield by 17.3%, 13.0% and 32.0%, and had a non-significant impact on WUE. Under the condition of straw mulching, NT increased PSE, SWS, grain yield and WUE by 43.7%, 38.1%, 40.6% and 42.9%, respectively, compared to CT. NT and RT increased the PSE, SWS and WUE, under normal mean annual precipitation (MAP), however, ST increased these observations under wet MAP, compared to CT. The effects of tillage methods varied with soil texture, and they were highly interrelated with water conservation, wheat yield and water use. We conclude that compared to conventional tillage, the conservation tillage methods increased soil water conservation during the fallow period, which increased wheat yield and water use. Moreover, NT with or without residue retention increased the fallow water conservation and wheat yield. Crop residues should be retained while applying RT and ST to grow winter wheat in dryland regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.13541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil water conservation in dryland agriculture mainly depends on precipitation. We chose 35 long-term experiments and analysed the data by using meta-analysis to check how fallow management methods affect soil water storage of dryland winter wheat planting (SWS), precipitation storage efficiency (PSE), crop yield and water use efficiency (WUE). No-tillage (NT), compared to conventional tillage (CT) in the fallow period, increased PSE, SWS, grain yield and WUE by 32.9%, 27.1%, 30.5% and 22.6%, respectively. Reduced tillage (RT) and subsoil tillage (ST) increased PSE by 15.2% and 11.7%, SWS by 17.4% and 15.0% and grain yield by 15.5 and 13.8%, respectively, but these had a non-significant effect on WUE. The conservation tillage methods interacted significantly with the residue management and fallow mulching practices. Compared to CT, the conservation tillage methods with fallow mulching increased PSE, SWS, grain yield and WUE, but the growing of cover crops (designated as biological mulching) decreased PSE, SWS and grain yield by 17.3%, 13.0% and 32.0%, and had a non-significant impact on WUE. Under the condition of straw mulching, NT increased PSE, SWS, grain yield and WUE by 43.7%, 38.1%, 40.6% and 42.9%, respectively, compared to CT. NT and RT increased the PSE, SWS and WUE, under normal mean annual precipitation (MAP), however, ST increased these observations under wet MAP, compared to CT. The effects of tillage methods varied with soil texture, and they were highly interrelated with water conservation, wheat yield and water use. We conclude that compared to conventional tillage, the conservation tillage methods increased soil water conservation during the fallow period, which increased wheat yield and water use. Moreover, NT with or without residue retention increased the fallow water conservation and wheat yield. Crop residues should be retained while applying RT and ST to grow winter wheat in dryland regions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理措施对旱地小麦土壤水分、产量和用水量的长期影响:全球荟萃分析
旱地农业的土壤水分保持主要依赖降水。我们选择了 35 项长期实验,并通过荟萃分析法对数据进行了分析,以检验休耕管理方法如何影响旱地冬小麦种植的土壤蓄水量(SWS)、降水储存效率(PSE)、作物产量和水分利用效率(WUE)。与传统耕作(CT)相比,休耕期免耕(NT)的降水储存效率(PSE)、土壤水分储存效率(SWS)、谷物产量和水分利用效率(WUE)分别提高了 32.9%、27.1%、30.5% 和 22.6%。减少耕作(RT)和底土耕作(ST)分别增加了 15.2% 和 11.7%的 PSE、17.4% 和 15.0%的 SWS 以及 15.5% 和 13.8% 的谷物产量,但对 WUE 的影响不显著。保护性耕作方法与残留管理和休耕覆膜方法之间存在显著的相互作用。与 CT 相比,采用休耕覆盖的保护性耕作方法增加了 PSE、SWS、谷物产量和 WUE,但种植覆盖作物(称为生物覆盖)使 PSE、SWS 和谷物产量分别减少了 17.3%、13.0% 和 32.0%,对 WUE 的影响不显著。在秸秆覆盖条件下,与 CT 相比,NT 使 PSE、SWS、谷物产量和 WUE 分别增加了 43.7%、38.1%、40.6% 和 42.9%。与 CT 相比,NT 和 RT 在正常年平均降水量(MAP)条件下增加了 PSE、SWS 和 WUE,但 ST 在潮湿年平均降水量(MAP)条件下增加了这些观测值。耕作方法的影响因土壤质地而异,并且与节水、小麦产量和用水量密切相关。我们的结论是,与传统耕作相比,保护性耕作方法提高了休耕期的土壤保水性,从而提高了小麦产量和用水量。此外,无论是否保留作物残茬,保护性耕作都能提高休耕期的水分保持率和小麦产量。在干旱地区种植冬小麦时,应在施用 RT 和 ST 的同时保留作物残茬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
期刊最新文献
Addition of Fe-humic acids to overcome analytical issues in measurements of isotopically exchangeable P in soil Easily mobilized metals and acidity in acid sulfate soils across the Swedish coastal plains ‘Shifting gears ain't easy’: Disciplinary resistances to perspective shifts in soil science and how to move forward Cover cropping in organic reduced tillage systems: Maximizing soil cover or plant above ground biomass input? No relationship between outputs of simple humus balance calculators (VDLUFA and STAND) and soil organic carbon trends
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1