Bedside-focused transthoracic echocardiography in acute atraumatic thoracic aortic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001174
Nick Mani, Nishant Cherian, Julia Burkert, Robert David Jarman
{"title":"Bedside-focused transthoracic echocardiography in acute atraumatic thoracic aortic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.","authors":"Nick Mani, Nishant Cherian, Julia Burkert, Robert David Jarman","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this review was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of bedside-focused transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in acute atraumatic thoracic aortic syndrome in adults. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of publications that described the use of bedside-focused TTE on adults presenting to emergency care settings with suspected atraumatic thoracic aortic syndrome. Studies were identified using keyword and MeSH on relevant databases as well as grey literature, followed by abstract screening and study selection by two independent reviewers. Sixteen studies over six decades were included in the meta-analysis ( n  = 4569 patients). The prevalence of type A thoracic aortic dissection was 11% (range 1.4-45.7%) and type B dissection was 7% (range 1.8-30.55%). Pooled sensitivity and specificity for type A dissection (through direct TTE visualisation of an intimal flap) were 89% [95% confidence interval (CI), 82-94%] and 92% (95% CI, 88-95%), respectively. For type B dissection, pooled sensitivity was 65% (95% CI, 45-80%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI, 0.69-100%). Regarding indirect TTE signs, pooled sensitivities and specificities were 64% (5.2-98.2%) and 94% (92-96.1%), respectively for aortic valve regurgitation, 92% (54-99.2%) and 87% (62-97%) for thoracic aortic aneurysm and 39% (33.8-45%) and 94% (92-95%) for pericardial effusion. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, bedside-focused TTE has high specificity for type A and B dissection, a moderate to high sensitivity for type A but poor for type B, and unclear diagnostic accuracy for intramural haematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"398-412"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this review was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of bedside-focused transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in acute atraumatic thoracic aortic syndrome in adults. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of publications that described the use of bedside-focused TTE on adults presenting to emergency care settings with suspected atraumatic thoracic aortic syndrome. Studies were identified using keyword and MeSH on relevant databases as well as grey literature, followed by abstract screening and study selection by two independent reviewers. Sixteen studies over six decades were included in the meta-analysis ( n  = 4569 patients). The prevalence of type A thoracic aortic dissection was 11% (range 1.4-45.7%) and type B dissection was 7% (range 1.8-30.55%). Pooled sensitivity and specificity for type A dissection (through direct TTE visualisation of an intimal flap) were 89% [95% confidence interval (CI), 82-94%] and 92% (95% CI, 88-95%), respectively. For type B dissection, pooled sensitivity was 65% (95% CI, 45-80%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI, 0.69-100%). Regarding indirect TTE signs, pooled sensitivities and specificities were 64% (5.2-98.2%) and 94% (92-96.1%), respectively for aortic valve regurgitation, 92% (54-99.2%) and 87% (62-97%) for thoracic aortic aneurysm and 39% (33.8-45%) and 94% (92-95%) for pericardial effusion. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, bedside-focused TTE has high specificity for type A and B dissection, a moderate to high sensitivity for type A but poor for type B, and unclear diagnostic accuracy for intramural haematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性创伤性胸主动脉综合征的床旁聚焦经胸超声心动图:诊断准确性的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本综述旨在评估床旁聚焦经胸超声心动图(TTE)对成人急性创伤性胸主动脉综合征的诊断准确性。我们对描述床旁聚焦经胸超声心动图用于疑似创伤性胸主动脉综合征的急诊成人的出版物进行了系统性回顾和荟萃分析。研究是通过对数据库和灰色文献进行关键词和医学主题词检索,然后由两名独立审稿人进行摘要筛选和研究选择后确定的。荟萃分析纳入了六十年来的 16 项研究(n = 4569 名患者)。A 型胸主动脉夹层的发病率为 11%(范围为 1.4-45.7%),B 型为 7%(范围为 1.8-30.55%)。通过 TTE 直接观察到内膜瓣的 A 型夹层(即直接征象)的集合敏感性和特异性分别为 89% [95% 置信区间 (CI),82-94%] 和 92% (95% CI,88-95%)。对于 B 型夹层,汇总灵敏度为 65%(95% CI,45-80%),特异性为 100%(95% CI,0.69-100%)。夹层的 TTE 间接征象显示,主动脉瓣反流的集合敏感性为 64%(95% CI,5.2-98.2%),特异性为 94%(95% CI,92-96.1%);主动脉瓣反流的集合敏感性为 92%(95% CI,54-99.2%),特异性为 87%(95% CI,62-97%);心包积液的集合敏感性为 39%(95% CI,33.8-45%),特异性为 94%(95% CI,92-95%)。在这项系统回顾和荟萃分析中,床旁聚焦 TTE 对 A 型和 B 型夹层具有良好的特异性,但对 B 型夹层的敏感性较差,对壁内血肿和穿透性主动脉溃疡的敏感性不明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field. Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
期刊最新文献
Procedural sedation in the emergency department by Italian emergency physicians: results of the SEED SIMEU registry. Association between time to antibiotic and mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the Emergency Department: post hoc analysis of the 1-BED randomized clinical trial. Association between lactate determined at emergency department arrival and the probability of inhospital mortality and intensive care admission in elderly patients. A decade of European Board Examination in Emergency Medicine: achievements and future perspectives. Contribution of point-of-care ultrasound in the prehospital management of patients with non-trauma acute dyspnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1