European Journal of Emergency Medicine最新文献

Background and importance: Modern emergency medicine (EM) is a complex, demanding, and occasionally stressful field of work. Working conditions, provider well-being, and associated health and performance outcomes are key factors influencing the establishment of a sustainable emergency department (ED) working environment.

Objectives: This multinational European Delphi survey aimed to identify unequivocal major factors for good and poor ED working conditions and their possible effects on health care provider well-being.

Design/setting and participants: A total of 18 experts from six European countries (Belgium, Finland, Germany, Italy, Romania, and the UK) covering three different hospital sizes (small, medium, and large) in their respective countries participated in the two-round Delphi survey. All panelists held leadership roles in EM.

Outcome measures and analysis: The first step involved conducting an extensive literature search on ED working conditions. The second step involved the first Delphi round, which consisted of structured interviews with the panelists. The survey was designed to obtain information concerning important working conditions, comments regarding work-life factors identified from the literature, and ratings of their importance. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed following a standardized protocol. In the second Delphi round, experts rated the relevance of items consolidated from the first Delphi round (classified into ED work system factors, provider health outcomes, and ED work-life intervention approaches).

Results: A nearly unequivocal consensus was obtained in four ED work condition categories, including positive (e.g. job challenges, personal motivation, and case complexities) and negative (e.g. overcrowding, workflow interruptions/multitasking, medical errors) ED work conditions. The highly relevant adverse personal health events identified included physical fatigue, exhaustion, and burnout. Concerning intervention practices, the panelists offered a wide spectrum of opportunities with less consensus.

Conclusion: Work system conditions exert positive and negative effects on the work life of ED providers across Europe. Although most European countries have varying health care systems, the expert-based survey results presented herein strongly suggest that improvement strategies should focus on system-related external stressors common in various countries. Our findings lay the scientific groundwork for future intervention studies at the local and systemic levels to improve ED provider work life.

Background and importance: Existing data are limited for determining the medical conditions best suited for an emergency department (ED) redirection strategy in a heterogeneous, nonurgent patient population.

Objective: The aim was to establish factors associated with hospital revisits within 7 days among patients discharged or redirected by a triage team.

Design, settings, and participants: An observational single-center case-control study was conducted at the Tampere University Hospital ED for the full calendar year of 2019. The cases comprised unplanned hospital revisits within 7 days of being discharged or redirected by triage, while the controls were discharged or redirected but did not revisit.

Outcome measures and analysis: The primary outcome was an unplanned hospital revisit within 7 days. A subgroup analysis was conducted for revisits leading to hospitalization. Basic demographics, comorbidities before triage, and triage visit characteristics were considered as predictive factors for the revisit. A backward stepwise conditional logistic regression analysis was performed.

Main results: During the calendar year of 2019, there were a total of 92 406 ED visits. Of these, 7216 (7.8%) visits were discharged or redirected by triage, and 6.5% ( n  = 467) of all these patients revisited. Of the revisiting patients, 25% ( n  = 117) were hospitalized. In multivariable analysis, higher age was associated with both revisitation [odds ratio (OR): 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.02] and hospitalization (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04). Furthermore, using other visits as a reference, abdominal pain was associated with revisitation and hospitalization (OR: 3.70, 95% CI: 2.24-6.11 and OR: 5.28, 95% CI: 2.08-13.4, respectively).

Conclusion: Higher age and abdominal pain were associated with hospital revisitation and hospitalization within 7 days among patients directly discharged or redirected by the triage team. Regardless of the triage system in use, there might be patient groups that should be evaluated more cautiously if a triage-based discharge or redirection strategy is to be considered.