Mechanical Thrombectomy for Hyperacute Vertebrobasilar Ischemic Stroke via Nondominant Vertebral Artery : Clinical Experience and Considerations.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.3340/jkns.2024.0104
Gi Yun Lee, ChanHyang Yang, Chul-Hoo Kang, Joong Goo Kim, Jin-Deok Joo, You Nam Chung, Ji Soon Huh, Jeong Jin Park, Jin Pyeong Jeon, Jong-Kook Rhim
{"title":"Mechanical Thrombectomy for Hyperacute Vertebrobasilar Ischemic Stroke via Nondominant Vertebral Artery : Clinical Experience and Considerations.","authors":"Gi Yun Lee, ChanHyang Yang, Chul-Hoo Kang, Joong Goo Kim, Jin-Deok Joo, You Nam Chung, Ji Soon Huh, Jeong Jin Park, Jin Pyeong Jeon, Jong-Kook Rhim","doi":"10.3340/jkns.2024.0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The dominant vertebral artery (VA) approach is primarily considered in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute occlusion of the vertebrobasilar (VB) artery. As accessing the dominant artery is sometimes difficult, we present our experience treating acute VB stroke via a nondominant VA approach through a comparison with the dominant VA approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 2,785 patients diagnosed with hyperacute ischemic stroke between January 2014 and December 2022, 50 patients with VB ischemic stroke underwent recanalization therapy through either dominant, nondominant, or bilateral VA approach. We evaluated patient characteristics and clinical course, highlighting the pros and cons of the access routes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients with hyperacute VB ischemic stroke were predominantly male (72%), with a mean age of 68.12 years and an initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score mean of 17.1. Large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA, 48%) and cardio-embolism (CE, 36%) were the main etiologic factors in the TOAST (Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) classification. After thrombectomy, 45 (90%) cases had final modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or higher. In summary, 41 patients were treated through the dominant VA, and 8 patients underwent the nondominant VA approach. However, there was no statistically significant difference in functional outcome or mortality between the two approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In MT for VB occlusions, nondominant VA approach may be an option in situations when the vessel is accessible, stable, or less risky, as recanalization can be achieved without rescue balloon angioplasty and/or stenting.</p>","PeriodicalId":16283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2024.0104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The dominant vertebral artery (VA) approach is primarily considered in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute occlusion of the vertebrobasilar (VB) artery. As accessing the dominant artery is sometimes difficult, we present our experience treating acute VB stroke via a nondominant VA approach through a comparison with the dominant VA approach.

Methods: Among 2,785 patients diagnosed with hyperacute ischemic stroke between January 2014 and December 2022, 50 patients with VB ischemic stroke underwent recanalization therapy through either dominant, nondominant, or bilateral VA approach. We evaluated patient characteristics and clinical course, highlighting the pros and cons of the access routes.

Results: The patients with hyperacute VB ischemic stroke were predominantly male (72%), with a mean age of 68.12 years and an initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score mean of 17.1. Large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA, 48%) and cardio-embolism (CE, 36%) were the main etiologic factors in the TOAST (Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) classification. After thrombectomy, 45 (90%) cases had final modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or higher. In summary, 41 patients were treated through the dominant VA, and 8 patients underwent the nondominant VA approach. However, there was no statistically significant difference in functional outcome or mortality between the two approaches.

Conclusion: In MT for VB occlusions, nondominant VA approach may be an option in situations when the vessel is accessible, stable, or less risky, as recanalization can be achieved without rescue balloon angioplasty and/or stenting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过非支配椎动脉治疗超急性椎基底动脉缺血性中风的机械取栓术:临床经验和注意事项。
目的:在治疗椎-基底动脉(VB)急性闭塞的机械取栓术(MT)中,主要考虑采用优势椎动脉(VA)入路。由于有时难以进入优势动脉,我们通过与优势椎动脉途径的比较,介绍了我们通过非优势椎动脉途径治疗急性椎基底动脉卒中的经验:在2014年1月至2022年12月期间确诊的2785名超急缺血性卒中患者中,50名VB缺血性卒中患者通过优势、非优势或双侧VA途径接受了再通治疗。我们评估了患者的特征和临床病程,强调了入路的利弊:超急性 VB 缺血性卒中患者主要为男性(72%),平均年龄为 68.12 岁,最初的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)平均评分为 17.1 分。大动脉粥样硬化(LAA,占 48%)和心肌栓塞(CE,占 36%)是 TOAST(急性中风治疗中的 Org 10172 试验)分类中的主要病因。血栓切除术后,45 例(90%)患者的脑梗塞改良溶栓术(mTICI)最终评分为 2b 或更高。总之,41 名患者通过优势 VA 方法进行了治疗,8 名患者通过非优势 VA 方法进行了治疗。然而,两种方法在功能预后或死亡率方面没有统计学意义上的显著差异:结论:在MT治疗VB闭塞时,如果血管通畅、稳定或风险较低,可以选择非显性VA入路,因为无需球囊血管成形术和/或支架植入术即可实现再通畅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society (J Korean Neurosurg Soc) is the official journal of the Korean Neurosurgical Society, and published bimonthly (1st day of January, March, May, July, September, and November). It launched in October 31, 1972 with Volume 1 and Number 1. J Korean Neurosurg Soc aims to allow neurosurgeons from around the world to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism. This journal publishes Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports, Technical Notes, and Letters to the Editor. Our field of interest involves clinical neurosurgery (cerebrovascular disease, neuro-oncology, skull base neurosurgery, spine, pediatric neurosurgery, functional neurosurgery, epilepsy, neuro-trauma, and peripheral nerve disease) and laboratory work in neuroscience.
期刊最新文献
Spermine Synthase : A Potential Prognostic Marker for Lower-Grade Gliomas. Strategic Dual Approach for the Management of a Symptomatic Giant Partially Thrombosed Aneurysm at the Basilar Tip - Integrating Intrasaccular Flow Diversion and Endovascular Flow Reversal. Envisioning the Future of the Neurosurgical Operating Room with the Concept of the Medical Metaverse. High-Volume Hospital Had Lower Mortality of Severe Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients. A 24-Hour Shift in the Neurosurgeon's World : Decompressive Hemicraniectomy during the Night.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1