Effects of respiratory muscular training in post-covid-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1186/s13102-024-00954-x
Diego Mendes Xavier, Ráina Anielle Lopes Abreu, Fabiane Gontijo Corrêa, Whesley Tanor Silva, Sarah Nascimento Silva, Endi Lanza Galvão, Marcos Gabriel do Nascimento Junior
{"title":"Effects of respiratory muscular training in post-covid-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Diego Mendes Xavier, Ráina Anielle Lopes Abreu, Fabiane Gontijo Corrêa, Whesley Tanor Silva, Sarah Nascimento Silva, Endi Lanza Galvão, Marcos Gabriel do Nascimento Junior","doi":"10.1186/s13102-024-00954-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-Covid-19 syndrome is defined as non-self-sustaining signs and/or symptoms lasting more than 12 weeks, occurring during or after a Covid-19 infection. The primary outcome was the analysis of the respiratory muscle training (RMT) result in respiratory muscle strength, (maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) e maximum expiratory pressure (MEP)); and the secondary results were the analysis of lung function, dyspnea, quality of life (QoL), fatigue and functional performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PICO description for this research was: P: patients diagnosed with post-Covid-19; I: RMT; C: Sham or simulated inspiratory or expiratory muscle training and usual care; O: MIP, MEP, Lung Function, level of dyspnea, QoL and functional performance. On January 15, 2024, the following databases were consulted: PubMed, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, PEDro and EMBASE. Randomized clinical trials were included without restrictions on year of publication or language. The data selection and extraction steps were carried out by two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search in the databases resulted in a total of 14,216 studies, and after the eligibility process, 7 studies were included with a sample of 527 patients. The MIP results suffered a statistically significant increase, that is, the RMT was favorable to improve the MIP (MD = 29.55cmH<sub>2</sub>O IC 95%: 7.56cmH<sub>2</sub>O to 51.54cmH<sub>2</sub>O, p = 0,00001). For the MEP outcome, the results were statistically significant in favor of RMT (MD = 10.93cmH2O CI 95%: 3.65cmH<sub>2</sub>O to 18.21cmH<sub>2</sub>O, p = 0.00001). We also noticed a significant improvement for the group that received the RMT in the distance covered in the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) MD = 40.70 m CI 95%: 18.23 m to 65.17 m%, p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We noticed that RMT is being used in patients with respiratory diseases, including post-Covid-19. Our systematic review observed that this training provides an increase in inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength, a reduction in dyspnea levels, and an increase in the distance covered in the 6MWT and improved QoL in post-covid patients after intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11351554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00954-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-Covid-19 syndrome is defined as non-self-sustaining signs and/or symptoms lasting more than 12 weeks, occurring during or after a Covid-19 infection. The primary outcome was the analysis of the respiratory muscle training (RMT) result in respiratory muscle strength, (maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) e maximum expiratory pressure (MEP)); and the secondary results were the analysis of lung function, dyspnea, quality of life (QoL), fatigue and functional performance.

Methods: The PICO description for this research was: P: patients diagnosed with post-Covid-19; I: RMT; C: Sham or simulated inspiratory or expiratory muscle training and usual care; O: MIP, MEP, Lung Function, level of dyspnea, QoL and functional performance. On January 15, 2024, the following databases were consulted: PubMed, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, PEDro and EMBASE. Randomized clinical trials were included without restrictions on year of publication or language. The data selection and extraction steps were carried out by two independent reviewers.

Results: The search in the databases resulted in a total of 14,216 studies, and after the eligibility process, 7 studies were included with a sample of 527 patients. The MIP results suffered a statistically significant increase, that is, the RMT was favorable to improve the MIP (MD = 29.55cmH2O IC 95%: 7.56cmH2O to 51.54cmH2O, p = 0,00001). For the MEP outcome, the results were statistically significant in favor of RMT (MD = 10.93cmH2O CI 95%: 3.65cmH2O to 18.21cmH2O, p = 0.00001). We also noticed a significant improvement for the group that received the RMT in the distance covered in the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) MD = 40.70 m CI 95%: 18.23 m to 65.17 m%, p = 0.01).

Conclusion: We noticed that RMT is being used in patients with respiratory diseases, including post-Covid-19. Our systematic review observed that this training provides an increase in inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength, a reduction in dyspnea levels, and an increase in the distance covered in the 6MWT and improved QoL in post-covid patients after intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
19岁病毒感染后患者呼吸肌肉训练的效果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:Covid-19感染后综合征是指在Covid-19感染期间或之后出现的非自身持续性体征和/或症状,持续时间超过12周。研究的主要结果是分析呼吸肌训练(RMT)对呼吸肌强度(最大吸气压力(MIP)和最大呼气压力(MEP))的影响;次要结果是分析肺功能、呼吸困难、生活质量(QoL)、疲劳和功能表现:本研究的 PICO 描述为方法:本研究的 PICO 描述为:P:确诊为后 Covid-19 的患者;I:O:MIP、MEP、肺功能、呼吸困难程度、QoL和功能表现。2024 年 1 月 15 日,查询了以下数据库:PubMed、Lilacs、Cochrane Library、PEDro 和 EMBASE。纳入的随机临床试验不受发表年份或语言的限制。数据选择和提取步骤由两名独立审稿人完成:在数据库中搜索到的研究共有 14,216 项,经过资格审查后,纳入了 7 项研究,样本为 527 名患者。MIP结果出现了统计学意义上的显著增加,即RMT有利于改善MIP(MD = 29.55cmH2O IC 95%: 7.56cmH2O to 51.54cmH2O, p = 0,00001)。在 MEP 结果方面,RMT 的结果具有显著的统计学意义(MD = 10.93cmH2O CI 95%: 3.65cmH2O to 18.21cmH2O,p = 0.00001)。我们还注意到,在 6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)中,接受 RMT 治疗组的步行距离明显增加(MD = 40.70 m CI 95%:结论:我们注意到,RMT 正被用于呼吸系统疾病患者,包括 Covid-19 后患者。我们的系统综述观察到,这种训练可增加吸气和呼气肌肉的力量,减少呼吸困难程度,增加 6MWT 的距离,并改善科维后患者干预后的 QoL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
期刊最新文献
An update on the management of axial spondyloarthritis for sports medicine professionals. 'Goalkeepers are players too': key attributes coaches' look for in talented youth soccer goalkeepers. Motivational and emotional correlates of physical activity and sedentary behavior after cardiac rehabilitation: an observational study. Aerobic capacity in swimming, cycling and arm cranking in swimmers aged 11-13 years. Assessing inter- and intra-rater reliability of movement scores and the effects of body-shape using a custom visualisation tool: an exploratory study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1