Sky-view factor enhanced doline delineation: A comparative methodological review based on case studies in Slovenia

IF 3.1 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Geomorphology Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109389
Sašo Stefanovski , Žiga Kokalj , Uroš Stepišnik
{"title":"Sky-view factor enhanced doline delineation: A comparative methodological review based on case studies in Slovenia","authors":"Sašo Stefanovski ,&nbsp;Žiga Kokalj ,&nbsp;Uroš Stepišnik","doi":"10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a novel method for the accurate delineation of dolines in karst areas. The method is based on the use of hydrological tools and sky-view Factor in ArcGIS Pro and was implemented using a digital elevation model with a resolution of 1 m in four study areas in Slovenia. We manually delineated dolines at four test areas and compared them with the results of the new method, as well as the results of the most commonly used method of hydrological filling and the results of U-Net segmentation. We calculated the average deviation of the perimeter and the differences in the basic morphometric properties. The hydrological filling method cannot be accepted as a suitable method for doline delineation and should only be used for doline identification. The method based on the U-Net segmentation performed better, but the results contain landforms that are not enclosed depressions and therefore cannot be considered as dolines. The new method utilizes the advantages of hydrological filling and at the same time improves the doline delineation. We conclude that the presented method is the most suitable for automatic doline identification and delineation among the automatic methods discussed in this paper. This study further quantifies the enhancements achieved with the new method, highlighting the specific improvements in perimeter accuracy and the reliability of morphometric measurements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55115,"journal":{"name":"Geomorphology","volume":"465 ","pages":"Article 109389"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomorphology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X24003398","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a novel method for the accurate delineation of dolines in karst areas. The method is based on the use of hydrological tools and sky-view Factor in ArcGIS Pro and was implemented using a digital elevation model with a resolution of 1 m in four study areas in Slovenia. We manually delineated dolines at four test areas and compared them with the results of the new method, as well as the results of the most commonly used method of hydrological filling and the results of U-Net segmentation. We calculated the average deviation of the perimeter and the differences in the basic morphometric properties. The hydrological filling method cannot be accepted as a suitable method for doline delineation and should only be used for doline identification. The method based on the U-Net segmentation performed better, but the results contain landforms that are not enclosed depressions and therefore cannot be considered as dolines. The new method utilizes the advantages of hydrological filling and at the same time improves the doline delineation. We conclude that the presented method is the most suitable for automatic doline identification and delineation among the automatic methods discussed in this paper. This study further quantifies the enhancements achieved with the new method, highlighting the specific improvements in perimeter accuracy and the reliability of morphometric measurements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
天空视角因素增强的多林划定:基于斯洛文尼亚案例研究的比较方法审查
本研究介绍了一种准确划分岩溶地区溶洞的新方法。该方法基于 ArcGIS Pro 中水文工具和天空视图因子的使用,并通过分辨率为 1 米的数字高程模型在斯洛文尼亚的四个研究区域实施。我们在四个测试区域人工划定了多尔线,并将其与新方法的结果、最常用的水文填图方法的结果以及 U-Net 分割的结果进行了比较。我们计算了周长的平均偏差和基本形态特征的差异。水文充填法不能作为划定穹隆的合适方法,只能用于穹隆的识别。基于 U-Net 分割的方法表现较好,但结果中包含的地貌并非封闭的洼地,因此不能被视为多林。新方法利用了水文充填的优势,同时改进了多林的划分。我们的结论是,在本文讨论的自动方法中,本文介绍的方法最适合用于自动识别和划定多林区。本研究进一步量化了新方法所取得的改进,强调了在周长精度和形态测量可靠性方面的具体改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geomorphology
Geomorphology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Our journal''s scope includes geomorphic themes of: tectonics and regional structure; glacial processes and landforms; fluvial sequences, Quaternary environmental change and dating; fluvial processes and landforms; mass movement, slopes and periglacial processes; hillslopes and soil erosion; weathering, karst and soils; aeolian processes and landforms, coastal dunes and arid environments; coastal and marine processes, estuaries and lakes; modelling, theoretical and quantitative geomorphology; DEM, GIS and remote sensing methods and applications; hazards, applied and planetary geomorphology; and volcanics.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Eastward drainage-divide migrations driven by the spatial variations in precipitation and tectonic uplift contribute to the formation of the Parallel Rivers in the Hengduan Mountains, Southeastern Tibet Predicting urban channel morphology amidst multiple complexities Applying geoarchaeological principles to marine archaeology: A new reappraisal of the “first marine” and “in-situ” lithic scatters, Murujuga (Dampier Archipelago), NW Australia Topographic ridges express late Quaternary faulting peripheral to the New Madrid seismic zone, intraplate USA: Their tectonic implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1