Functionalism in ecology and economics: Epistemological affinities and temptations

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Conservation Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110762
Hadrien Lantremange
{"title":"Functionalism in ecology and economics: Epistemological affinities and temptations","authors":"Hadrien Lantremange","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Functionalism is a natural bridge between ecology and economics. Faced with a systemic issue like the biodiversity crisis, functionalism is particularly useful for economic reasoning, as it allows to break down a complex reality by estimating the contribution of the parts to the general performance of the whole. In this manner, items that are crucial to the functioning of the ecosystem can be preserved in priority. However, while functionalist language is relatively common in environmental sciences, its use is very debated in the philosophy of sciences and ecology. In the philosophy of science, functionalism raises question because it implicitly introduces finalism into scientific reflection. In ecology, it interrogates because it implies a certain degree of organicism, which contemporary ecologists are relatively reticent about.</p><p>This article reviews the epistemological debates about functionalism in ecology. It attempts to identify its current area of scientific validity and highlights some important implications for economics. It emphasizes, in particular, that functionalism depends on the system examined and remains inapplicable wherever singularity prevails. Finally, we highlight the risk of conceptualizing the environment through purely abstract functionalism, which could lead to assume functional equivalences without empirical verification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"298 ","pages":"Article 110762"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724003240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Functionalism is a natural bridge between ecology and economics. Faced with a systemic issue like the biodiversity crisis, functionalism is particularly useful for economic reasoning, as it allows to break down a complex reality by estimating the contribution of the parts to the general performance of the whole. In this manner, items that are crucial to the functioning of the ecosystem can be preserved in priority. However, while functionalist language is relatively common in environmental sciences, its use is very debated in the philosophy of sciences and ecology. In the philosophy of science, functionalism raises question because it implicitly introduces finalism into scientific reflection. In ecology, it interrogates because it implies a certain degree of organicism, which contemporary ecologists are relatively reticent about.

This article reviews the epistemological debates about functionalism in ecology. It attempts to identify its current area of scientific validity and highlights some important implications for economics. It emphasizes, in particular, that functionalism depends on the system examined and remains inapplicable wherever singularity prevails. Finally, we highlight the risk of conceptualizing the environment through purely abstract functionalism, which could lead to assume functional equivalences without empirical verification.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生态学和经济学中的功能主义:认识论的亲和力与诱惑力
功能主义是生态学与经济学之间的天然桥梁。面对生物多样性危机这样的系统性问题,功能主义对经济学推理特别有用,因为它可以通过估算各部分对整体总体表现的贡献来分解复杂的现实。通过这种方式,可以优先保留对生态系统运作至关重要的项目。然而,虽然功能主义语言在环境科学中比较常见,但其在科学哲学和生态学中的使用却备受争议。在科学哲学中,功能主义引发了质疑,因为它隐含地将最终主义引入了科学反思。在生态学中,功能主义受到质疑,因为它意味着某种程度的有机主义,而当代生态学家对有机主义相对谨慎。本文回顾了生态学中关于功能主义认识论的争论,试图确定其当前的科学有效性领域,并强调其对经济学的一些重要影响。文章特别强调,功能主义取决于所研究的系统,在单一性盛行的地方仍然不适用。最后,我们强调了通过纯粹抽象的功能主义对环境进行概念化的风险,这可能导致在没有经验验证的情况下假定功能等同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
期刊最新文献
What Science in the tropics should not be about Present distribution of common hippopotamus populations in southern Africa, and the need for a centralised database Managing multiple threats: Evaluating the efficacy of broad-scale introduced predator management in improving native mammal resilience to fire Optimizing demographic analysis in the face of missing data years to improve conservation of threatened species Spatial distribution of tree-related microhabitats in European beech-dominated forests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1