‘Generation Share’ versus ‘Generation Rent’: Analysing the spatial preferences of shared rental housing

IF 4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Applied Geography Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103398
Ling Li , Kuang Kuang Deng
{"title":"‘Generation Share’ versus ‘Generation Rent’: Analysing the spatial preferences of shared rental housing","authors":"Ling Li ,&nbsp;Kuang Kuang Deng","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A growing number of young adults are choosing to live in private rental housing and sharing with unknown individuals in order to reduce their housing expenses. However, young housing sharers are generally treated as homogeneous to other renters in academic research and policy formation, leaving some of their unique housing issues unaddressed. This study examines how young housing sharers differ from their counterparts living in conventional or unshared rental housing. More specifically, we compare the spatial preferences of housing sharers to the spatial preferences of conventional housing renters, using a unique dataset of over 0.8 million private rental housing records collected in Shanghai, China. The results using a revealed-preference approach based on a hedonic pricing model demonstrate significant differences in their preference for location characteristics. Housing sharers are more willing to pay for proximity to employment centres and metro stations than conventional housing renters. Following the outbreak of Covid-19, the difference has narrowed to some extent, and housing sharers have moved further from employment centres. Rather, housing sharers are less concerned about access to public and private service amenities. The findings of this study contribute to our understanding of the recent housing tenure shift toward sharing among the younger generation and its potential impact on age-related segmentation in the housing market.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 103398"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622824002030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing number of young adults are choosing to live in private rental housing and sharing with unknown individuals in order to reduce their housing expenses. However, young housing sharers are generally treated as homogeneous to other renters in academic research and policy formation, leaving some of their unique housing issues unaddressed. This study examines how young housing sharers differ from their counterparts living in conventional or unshared rental housing. More specifically, we compare the spatial preferences of housing sharers to the spatial preferences of conventional housing renters, using a unique dataset of over 0.8 million private rental housing records collected in Shanghai, China. The results using a revealed-preference approach based on a hedonic pricing model demonstrate significant differences in their preference for location characteristics. Housing sharers are more willing to pay for proximity to employment centres and metro stations than conventional housing renters. Following the outbreak of Covid-19, the difference has narrowed to some extent, and housing sharers have moved further from employment centres. Rather, housing sharers are less concerned about access to public and private service amenities. The findings of this study contribute to our understanding of the recent housing tenure shift toward sharing among the younger generation and its potential impact on age-related segmentation in the housing market.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一代共享 "与 "一代出租":分析合租住房的空间偏好
越来越多的年轻人选择租住私人住房,并与不认识的人合租,以减少住房开支。然而,在学术研究和政策制定过程中,年轻的合租者通常被视为与其他租房者一样,从而导致他们的一些独特住房问题得不到解决。本研究探讨了青年合租者与居住在传统或非合租房中的租房者有何不同。更具体地说,我们利用在中国上海收集到的 80 多万条私人租赁住房记录的独特数据集,比较了住房共享者的空间偏好与传统住房租赁者的空间偏好。使用基于享乐主义定价模型的显现偏好方法得出的结果表明,他们对区位特征的偏好存在显著差异。与传统住房租赁者相比,住房共享者更愿意为靠近就业中心和地铁站付费。在 Covid-19 爆发后,这种差异在一定程度上缩小了,住房共享者也离就业中心更远了。相反,住房合租者对获得公共和私人服务设施的关注度较低。本研究的结果有助于我们理解近期年轻一代住房使用权向合租的转变,以及其对住房市场中与年龄相关的细分的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Geography
Applied Geography GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.
期刊最新文献
Methamphetamine spread in the Seoul metropolitan area: Geographical random forest modeling approach Editorial Board Uncovering the similarity and heterogeneity of metro stations: From passenger mobility, land use, and streetscapes semantics Spatio-temporal heterogeneity and influencing factors in the synergistic enhancement of urban ecological resilience: Evidence from the Yellow River Basin of China Multiple local co-agglomeration: Modelling spatial-temporal variations of coworking spaces and creative industries clustering in two central European Capitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1