The Imbibition Mechanism and the Calculation Method of Maximum Imbibition Length during the Hydraulic Fracturing

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Energy Research Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1155/2024/8371615
Zhongwei Wu, Xianhong Li, Chuanzhi Cui, Yin Qian, Yidan Wang, Japan J. Trivedi
{"title":"The Imbibition Mechanism and the Calculation Method of Maximum Imbibition Length during the Hydraulic Fracturing","authors":"Zhongwei Wu,&nbsp;Xianhong Li,&nbsp;Chuanzhi Cui,&nbsp;Yin Qian,&nbsp;Yidan Wang,&nbsp;Japan J. Trivedi","doi":"10.1155/2024/8371615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>It has been recognized that fluid imbibes into the matrix and floods the oil during hydraulic fracturing; however, the mechanism of fluid imbibing into the matrix and flooding the oil remains unclear. Additionally, there is a scarcity of methods for calculating the maximum imbibition length. In this paper, we first analyzed the imbibition mechanism during hydraulic fracturing and then developed a method for calculating the imbibition length using mercury intrusion experiments, seepage theory, and numerical calculations. By comparing the proposed method calculations with experimental results and published model calculations, we verified our proposed method. Finally, we presented the influences of the maximum imbibition length. From the work, we can know that imbibition during hydraulic fracturing involves counter-current imbibition under surrounding pressure. The influence of permeability on threshold pressure gradients was found to be greater than that on capillary pressure, resulting in an increase in the maximum imbibition length with increased permeability (ranging from 0.01 to 0.2 × 10<sup>−3</sup> <i>μ</i>m<sup>2</sup>), while the time taken to achieve the maximum imbibition length decreased exponentially. When the reservoir permeability was 0.1 × 10<sup>−3</sup> <i>μ</i>m<sup>2</sup>, the contact angle was 60°, and the interface tension was 50 mN/m, the maximum imbibition length was 1.8 m, and the time of achieving maximum imbibition length was 70 days. This study provided a method for evaluating the extent of imbibition.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8371615","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8371615","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has been recognized that fluid imbibes into the matrix and floods the oil during hydraulic fracturing; however, the mechanism of fluid imbibing into the matrix and flooding the oil remains unclear. Additionally, there is a scarcity of methods for calculating the maximum imbibition length. In this paper, we first analyzed the imbibition mechanism during hydraulic fracturing and then developed a method for calculating the imbibition length using mercury intrusion experiments, seepage theory, and numerical calculations. By comparing the proposed method calculations with experimental results and published model calculations, we verified our proposed method. Finally, we presented the influences of the maximum imbibition length. From the work, we can know that imbibition during hydraulic fracturing involves counter-current imbibition under surrounding pressure. The influence of permeability on threshold pressure gradients was found to be greater than that on capillary pressure, resulting in an increase in the maximum imbibition length with increased permeability (ranging from 0.01 to 0.2 × 10−3μm2), while the time taken to achieve the maximum imbibition length decreased exponentially. When the reservoir permeability was 0.1 × 10−3μm2, the contact angle was 60°, and the interface tension was 50 mN/m, the maximum imbibition length was 1.8 m, and the time of achieving maximum imbibition length was 70 days. This study provided a method for evaluating the extent of imbibition.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水力压裂过程中的浸润机理和最大浸润长度计算方法
人们已经认识到,在水力压裂过程中,流体会渗入基质并淹没油层;然而,流体渗入基质并淹没油层的机理仍不清楚。此外,也缺乏计算最大浸入长度的方法。本文首先分析了水力压裂过程中的浸润机理,然后利用汞侵入实验、渗流理论和数值计算,开发了一种计算浸润长度的方法。通过将所提出的方法计算结果与实验结果和已公布的模型计算结果进行比较,我们验证了所提出的方法。最后,我们介绍了最大浸润长度的影响因素。从工作中我们可以了解到,水力压裂过程中的浸润包括周围压力下的逆流浸润。研究发现,渗透率对阈值压力梯度的影响大于对毛细管压力的影响,从而导致最大浸润长度随渗透率的增加而增加(从 0.01 到 0.2 × 10-3 μm2),而达到最大浸润长度所需的时间则呈指数下降。当储层渗透率为 0.1 × 10-3 μm2、接触角为 60°、界面张力为 50 mN/m 时,最大浸润长度为 1.8 m,达到最大浸润长度的时间为 70 天。这项研究提供了一种评估浸润程度的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Energy Research
International Journal of Energy Research 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1170
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Energy Research (IJER) is dedicated to providing a multidisciplinary, unique platform for researchers, scientists, engineers, technology developers, planners, and policy makers to present their research results and findings in a compelling manner on novel energy systems and applications. IJER covers the entire spectrum of energy from production to conversion, conservation, management, systems, technologies, etc. We encourage papers submissions aiming at better efficiency, cost improvements, more effective resource use, improved design and analysis, reduced environmental impact, and hence leading to better sustainability. IJER is concerned with the development and exploitation of both advanced traditional and new energy sources, systems, technologies and applications. Interdisciplinary subjects in the area of novel energy systems and applications are also encouraged. High-quality research papers are solicited in, but are not limited to, the following areas with innovative and novel contents: -Biofuels and alternatives -Carbon capturing and storage technologies -Clean coal technologies -Energy conversion, conservation and management -Energy storage -Energy systems -Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation -Hydrogen energy and fuel cells -Hydrogen production technologies -Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies -Nuclear energy -Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass) -Smart energy system
期刊最新文献
Thermal Analysis of MHD-Modified Hybrid Nanofluid Flow Inside Convergent/Divergent Channel With Heat Generation/Absorption and Viscous-Ohmic Dissipation Utilising Polyester and Steel Slag-Derived Metal/Carbon Composites as Catalysts in Biodiesel Production Pore Evolution Law and Gas Migration Characteristics of Acidified Anthracite in Liquid CO2-ECBM: An Experimental Study An Extension of Root Assessment Method (RAM) Under Spherical Fuzzy Framework for Optimal Selection of Electricity Production Technologies Toward Sustainability: A Case Study Metaheuristic Algorithm-Based Optimal Energy Operation Scheduling and Energy System Sizing Scheme for PV-ESS Integrated Systems in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1