Comparison of granisetron and palonosetron in triplet anti-emetic prophylaxis in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1177/10781552241279537
Murat Araz, Ismail Beypinar, Fatih Inci, Lokman Koral, Mehmet Zahid Kocak, Mustafa Korkmaz, Aykut Demirkiran, Melek Karakurt Eryilmaz, Mehmet Artac
{"title":"Comparison of granisetron and palonosetron in triplet anti-emetic prophylaxis in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy.","authors":"Murat Araz, Ismail Beypinar, Fatih Inci, Lokman Koral, Mehmet Zahid Kocak, Mustafa Korkmaz, Aykut Demirkiran, Melek Karakurt Eryilmaz, Mehmet Artac","doi":"10.1177/10781552241279537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We compared the efficacy of first-generation granisetron and second-generation palonosetron in triplet anti-emetic prophylaxis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving cisplatin-based high emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, observational study was conducted between June 2018 and December 2021. Patients diagnosed with NSCLC who received triplet anti-emetic prophylactic treatment with aprepitant and dexamethasone plus granisetron or palonosetron before the first cycle of chemotherapy were included in the study. At the end of the first week after chemotherapy, the emesis scale was applied to the patients during the outpatient control. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) and total control (TC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred twenty-one patients were included in the study. Sixty-one patients were in the granisetron group and 60 patients were in the palonosetron group. CR was higher with granisetron in the acute phase (70.5% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.16; respectively) and higher with palonosetron in the delayed phase (61.7% vs. 55.7%, p = 0.5; respectively), although not statistically significant. The TC rates were also not significantly different between the groups (54.1% vs.57.6%, p = 0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference between granisetron and palonosetron in both acute and delayed control of emesis in NSCLC patients receiving cisplatin-based HEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241279537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We compared the efficacy of first-generation granisetron and second-generation palonosetron in triplet anti-emetic prophylaxis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving cisplatin-based high emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).

Methods: This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, observational study was conducted between June 2018 and December 2021. Patients diagnosed with NSCLC who received triplet anti-emetic prophylactic treatment with aprepitant and dexamethasone plus granisetron or palonosetron before the first cycle of chemotherapy were included in the study. At the end of the first week after chemotherapy, the emesis scale was applied to the patients during the outpatient control. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) and total control (TC).

Results: One hundred twenty-one patients were included in the study. Sixty-one patients were in the granisetron group and 60 patients were in the palonosetron group. CR was higher with granisetron in the acute phase (70.5% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.16; respectively) and higher with palonosetron in the delayed phase (61.7% vs. 55.7%, p = 0.5; respectively), although not statistically significant. The TC rates were also not significantly different between the groups (54.1% vs.57.6%, p = 0.69).

Conclusions: There was no significant difference between granisetron and palonosetron in both acute and delayed control of emesis in NSCLC patients receiving cisplatin-based HEC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较格拉司琼和帕洛诺司琼在接受顺铂为基础的高致吐性化疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的三联止吐预防中的作用。
简介我们比较了第一代格拉司琼和第二代帕洛诺司琼在接受顺铂为基础的高致吐化疗(HEC)的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者三联止吐预防中的疗效:这项前瞻性、多中心、非随机、观察性研究于2018年6月至2021年12月期间进行。研究纳入了确诊为NSCLC的患者,这些患者在第一周期化疗前接受了阿普瑞坦和地塞米松加格拉尼司琼或帕洛诺司琼的三联止吐预防治疗。化疗后第一周结束时,在门诊对照组中对患者进行催吐评分。研究的主要终点是完全反应(CR)和完全控制(TC):研究共纳入了121名患者。格拉司琼组 61 例,帕洛诺司琼组 60 例。急性期使用格拉司琼的 CR 更高(分别为 70.5% 对 58.3%,p = 0.16;),延迟期使用帕洛诺司琼的 CR 更高(分别为 61.7% 对 55.7%,p = 0.5;),但无统计学意义。各组的 TC 率也无明显差异(54.1% 对 57.6%,p = 0.69):结论:格拉司琼和帕洛诺司琼对接受顺铂为基础的 HEC 治疗的 NSCLC 患者在急性和延迟控制呕吐方面没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
期刊最新文献
Recurrent, multisystem angioedema induced by 5-azacitidine. Exclusion of ranitidine from premedication regimen during paclitaxel treatment: A retrospective single-center analysis. Investigation of 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity in combinational therapy: Influence of risk factors and demographics in a Pakistani population. Drug induced lupus associated with Trastuzumab emtansine in a patient with metastatic breast cancer. Identifying risk factors of dose reduction or treatment discontinuation due to fatigue or gastrointestinal symptoms in patients receiving lenvatinib treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1