Exclusion of ranitidine from premedication regimen during paclitaxel treatment: A retrospective single-center analysis.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1177/10781552241288143
Araceli Iglesias-Santamaría
{"title":"Exclusion of ranitidine from premedication regimen during paclitaxel treatment: A retrospective single-center analysis.","authors":"Araceli Iglesias-Santamaría","doi":"10.1177/10781552241288143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To minimize the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) caused by paclitaxel infusion, premedication with corticosteroid, H1-antagonist and H2 antagonist (ranitidine) was standard of care. Discontinuation of ranitidine in 2020 led to adjustments in premedication regimens and a new regimen without ranitidine was implemented in our center. This study aimed to compare the incidence of HSRs during paclitaxel treatment of a standard premedication regimen including ranitidine with a new premedication regimen without ranitidine and with a titrated infusion rate during the first two administrations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data analysis was performed on two cohorts of adult patients with solid tumors who started treatment with paclitaxel and received a premedication regimen with and without ranitidine over the years 2021 and 2023 respectively (before and after ranitidine withdrawal). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate any associations with H2 antagonist treatment adjusting for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 319 patients were included. 158 patients received the standard premedication regimen with ranitidine compared to 161 patients who did not received ranitidine. HSRs were observed in 10 of 1101 administrations of paclitaxel (0,90%) in ranitidine group compared to 2 of 899 (0,22%) in the ranitidine-free cohort (p = 0.048). Analysis incidence per patient also found results with statistically significant differences: 5.7% (9 of 158 patients) in the ranitidine cohort compared to 1.2% (2 of 161 patients) in the ranitidine-free cohort (p = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the study show the effectiveness of a premedication regimen including only dexchlorpherinamine and dexamethasone, along with a titrated infusion rate during the first two administrations, in reducing the incidence of paclitaxed-induced HSRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552241288143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241288143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To minimize the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) caused by paclitaxel infusion, premedication with corticosteroid, H1-antagonist and H2 antagonist (ranitidine) was standard of care. Discontinuation of ranitidine in 2020 led to adjustments in premedication regimens and a new regimen without ranitidine was implemented in our center. This study aimed to compare the incidence of HSRs during paclitaxel treatment of a standard premedication regimen including ranitidine with a new premedication regimen without ranitidine and with a titrated infusion rate during the first two administrations.

Methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed on two cohorts of adult patients with solid tumors who started treatment with paclitaxel and received a premedication regimen with and without ranitidine over the years 2021 and 2023 respectively (before and after ranitidine withdrawal). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate any associations with H2 antagonist treatment adjusting for confounding variables.

Results: A total of 319 patients were included. 158 patients received the standard premedication regimen with ranitidine compared to 161 patients who did not received ranitidine. HSRs were observed in 10 of 1101 administrations of paclitaxel (0,90%) in ranitidine group compared to 2 of 899 (0,22%) in the ranitidine-free cohort (p = 0.048). Analysis incidence per patient also found results with statistically significant differences: 5.7% (9 of 158 patients) in the ranitidine cohort compared to 1.2% (2 of 161 patients) in the ranitidine-free cohort (p = 0.029).

Conclusions: The results of the study show the effectiveness of a premedication regimen including only dexchlorpherinamine and dexamethasone, along with a titrated infusion rate during the first two administrations, in reducing the incidence of paclitaxed-induced HSRs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紫杉醇治疗过程中排除雷尼替丁的预处理方案:单中心回顾性分析
简介:为了最大限度地降低紫杉醇输注引起超敏反应(HSR)的风险,使用皮质类固醇、H1-拮抗剂和H2-拮抗剂(雷尼替丁)进行预处理是标准的治疗方法。2020 年雷尼替丁的停用导致了预处理方案的调整,我们中心实施了不含雷尼替丁的新方案。本研究旨在比较包括雷尼替丁在内的标准预处理方案与不含雷尼替丁的新预处理方案在紫杉醇治疗期间HSR的发生率,以及前两次给药期间滴注速率:对开始接受紫杉醇治疗的两组成年实体瘤患者进行了回顾性数据分析,这两组患者分别在2021年和2023年(雷尼替丁停药前和停药后)接受了含雷尼替丁和不含雷尼替丁的预处理方案。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型研究H2拮抗剂治疗与混杂变量的关系:共纳入 319 例患者。158名患者接受了雷尼替丁标准预处理方案,161名患者未接受雷尼替丁治疗。雷尼替丁组在紫杉醇的 1101 次给药中有 10 次(0.90%)观察到 HSR,而无雷尼替丁组在 899 次给药中有 2 次(0.22%)观察到 HSR(p = 0.048)。对每位患者发病率的分析结果也发现了显著的统计学差异:雷尼替丁组的发病率为5.7%(158例患者中的9例),而无雷尼替丁组的发病率为1.2%(161例患者中的2例)(P = 0.029):研究结果表明,仅使用右氯苯那敏和地塞米松的预处理方案,以及在前两次给药期间采用滴定输注速率,可有效降低紫杉醇诱导的HSR发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
期刊最新文献
Cytotoxic surface contamination in hospitals: Current practices, challenges and perspectives. Cytomegalovirus viremia and hepatitis B reactivation in patient with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with pralsetinib. Workflow evaluation of environmental contamination with hazardous drugs during compounding and administration in an UK hospital. An assessment of seven closed system transfer devices in accordance with the 2015 NIOSH vapor containment performance protocol. Hospital pharmacists' perceived competence in providing care to oncology patients - (HoPP-CoP2).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1