What influences patient decisions when selecting an obesity treatment?

{"title":"What influences patient decisions when selecting an obesity treatment?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.obpill.2024.100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objectives of this study were to understand patient preferences for obesity treatments, to describe how patients choose treatment options, and what factors influence their decisions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This participatory action research used purposeful sampling to recruit 10 patients with complications of obesity. Photovoice was used as the qualitative research methodology. Recruitment took place in specialist clinics for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Two males and eight females aged 18–75 years, with a BMI greater than 35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were recruited. Participants watched a 60-min ​video explaining nutritional, pharmacological, and surgical therapies in equipoise. Data was collected using photographs with a disposal camera followed by one-to-one semi-structured interviews. Afterward, this analysis utilised reflective thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five main themes were identified that influenced patients' decisions when selecting an obesity treatment: 1] Accessibility issues, 2] Polypharmacy, 3] Fears around future health 4] Lack of Support 5] Information Mismanagement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The themes identified in this study represent the patients’ voices for those living with obesity complications and what influences their decisions on treatment options. The findings underscore the need for a holistic and patient-centred approach to the management of obesity and its associated complications. Patient-centred care including knowledge, health literacy, support, and participation is essential to providing effective care for patients with obesity to make decisions between treatment options.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100977,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Pillars","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667368124000251/pdfft?md5=ffaae5f6be5df79ea2acc3b2979555dc&pid=1-s2.0-S2667368124000251-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Pillars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667368124000251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The objectives of this study were to understand patient preferences for obesity treatments, to describe how patients choose treatment options, and what factors influence their decisions.

Methods

This participatory action research used purposeful sampling to recruit 10 patients with complications of obesity. Photovoice was used as the qualitative research methodology. Recruitment took place in specialist clinics for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Two males and eight females aged 18–75 years, with a BMI greater than 35 kg/m2 were recruited. Participants watched a 60-min ​video explaining nutritional, pharmacological, and surgical therapies in equipoise. Data was collected using photographs with a disposal camera followed by one-to-one semi-structured interviews. Afterward, this analysis utilised reflective thematic analysis.

Results

Five main themes were identified that influenced patients' decisions when selecting an obesity treatment: 1] Accessibility issues, 2] Polypharmacy, 3] Fears around future health 4] Lack of Support 5] Information Mismanagement.

Conclusion

The themes identified in this study represent the patients’ voices for those living with obesity complications and what influences their decisions on treatment options. The findings underscore the need for a holistic and patient-centred approach to the management of obesity and its associated complications. Patient-centred care including knowledge, health literacy, support, and participation is essential to providing effective care for patients with obesity to make decisions between treatment options.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在选择肥胖症治疗方法时,是什么影响了患者的决定?
本研究的目的是了解患者对肥胖症治疗的偏好,描述患者如何选择治疗方案,以及哪些因素会影响他们的决定。方法这项参与式行动研究采用有目的的抽样调查,招募了 10 名肥胖症并发症患者。这项参与式行动研究采用了有目的的抽样方法,招募了 10 名患有肥胖症并发症的患者。招募活动在代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪肝、糖尿病、高血压和慢性肾病专科门诊进行。共招募了 2 名男性和 8 名女性,年龄在 18-75 岁之间,体重指数大于 35 kg/m2。参与者观看了 60 分钟的视频,视频中讲解了营养、药物和手术疗法。在一对一的半结构式访谈之后,使用处置相机拍照收集数据。随后,本分析采用了反思性主题分析法。结果确定了影响患者在选择肥胖治疗方法时做出决定的五大主题:1] 可及性问题]多药治疗,3]对未来健康的担忧]缺乏支持 5]结论本研究确定的主题代表了肥胖并发症患者的心声,以及影响他们做出治疗选择决定的因素。研究结果表明,在治疗肥胖症及其相关并发症时,需要采取以患者为中心的综合方法。以患者为中心的护理,包括知识、健康知识、支持和参与,对于为肥胖症患者提供有效护理,使其在治疗方案之间做出决定至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of in-person versus digital enhanced lifestyle interventions in adults with overweight and obesity Effect of resveratrol supplementation on metabolic risk markers and anthropometric parameters in individuals with obesity or overweight: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Diagnosis and management of metabolic dysfunction- associated steatotic liver disease in South Asians- A clinical review Case report of a female western Indian vegetarian with obesity Retrospective review of seven patients with obesity simultaneously treated with a combination of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and a meal replacement product
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1