Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Helicopter Transport Utilization in Severely Injury Children

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the National Medical Association Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jnma.2024.07.049
Christian Mpody MD, PhD, MBA, Joseph D. Tobias MD, Olubukola O. Nafiu MD
{"title":"Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Helicopter Transport Utilization in Severely Injury Children","authors":"Christian Mpody MD, PhD, MBA,&nbsp;Joseph D. Tobias MD,&nbsp;Olubukola O. Nafiu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2024.07.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In the United States, trauma is a leading cause of pediatric mortality. In severe injury, every second counts towards maximizing survival, an urgency encapsulated in the concept of the 'Golden Hour.' In this context, helicopter air ambulances is as a vital component of the emergency medical services system, reducing the time to definitive care for severely injured patients. However, persisting racial and ethnic disparities in trauma outcomes in the US raise questions about whether non-clinical factors, such as race or ethnicity, influence the deployment of life saving interventions, such as air transport for severely injured children. In this study, we evaluated whether there is a racial or ethnic disparity in the risk-adjusted use of helicopter ambulance following severe pediatric trauma. We also evaluated whether the gaps in helicopter utilization between children of different races and ethnicity have begun to narrow or widen over time.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a population-based, 1:1 propensity-score matched, retrospective cohort study using data from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) between 2017 and 2022. Our cohort included 42,812children (15) and had and emergency department disposition to the operating room or the ICU at level I or II trauma centers. Our primary outcome was the risk-adjusted transport mode comparing racial/ethnic groups (helicopter ambulance vs. ground ambulance). We used linear risk and log-binomial regression models and summarized the results as adjusted relative risk (RRadj), absolute risk difference (RDadj) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To account for clinical characteristics that could influence the decision to use helicopter transport, the propensity score models controlled for age, sex, hospital teaching status, American College of Surgeons verification level, state designation, hospital bed size, patient's primary insurance, injury intentionality, injury mechanism, chronic complex condition, body region, injury severity score, EMS reported Glasgow coma scale, heart rate and systolic blood pressure, and a distance indicator between injury site and receiving hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Helicopter transport was associated with a lower mortality risk compared to ground transport (RRadj: 0.86, 95%CI: 0.79 to 0.93, P-value &lt; 0.001). Despite the mortality benefits of helicopter utilization, non-Hispanic Black children were 50% relative less likely to be air transported, compared to Non-Hispanic White children (20.0% vs. 33.6%, RDadj: -20.0%, 95% CI: -22.0 to -18.0, P-value &lt; 0.001). Similarly, Non-Hispanic Others (24.7% vs. 33.6%, RDadj: -11.0%, 95% CI: -14.0 to -8.0%, P-value &lt; 0.001), and Hispanics (24.0% vs. 33.6%, RDadj: -11.0%, 95% CI: -13.0 to -10.0%, P-value &lt; 0.001) were both less likely to be air transported compared to Non-Hispanic White children—Figure 1. We found no statistical evidence of narrowing of the disparity gap during the study period (likelihood ratio test for the interaction between race/ethnicity and year, P-value = 0.180)</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite the clear survival benefits of helicopter transport in severe trauma situations, minority populations are less likely to be airlifted compared to White children. These disparities have not narrowed over time, challenging the effectiveness of current efforts to expand helicopter ambulance programs. As pediatric trauma care continues to evolve, it is our collective responsibility to ensure that access to rapid and life-saving care is not – advertently or inadvertently – affected by non-clinical needs such as race and ethnicity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"116 4","pages":"Pages 432-433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968424001305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In the United States, trauma is a leading cause of pediatric mortality. In severe injury, every second counts towards maximizing survival, an urgency encapsulated in the concept of the 'Golden Hour.' In this context, helicopter air ambulances is as a vital component of the emergency medical services system, reducing the time to definitive care for severely injured patients. However, persisting racial and ethnic disparities in trauma outcomes in the US raise questions about whether non-clinical factors, such as race or ethnicity, influence the deployment of life saving interventions, such as air transport for severely injured children. In this study, we evaluated whether there is a racial or ethnic disparity in the risk-adjusted use of helicopter ambulance following severe pediatric trauma. We also evaluated whether the gaps in helicopter utilization between children of different races and ethnicity have begun to narrow or widen over time.

Methods

We conducted a population-based, 1:1 propensity-score matched, retrospective cohort study using data from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) between 2017 and 2022. Our cohort included 42,812children (15) and had and emergency department disposition to the operating room or the ICU at level I or II trauma centers. Our primary outcome was the risk-adjusted transport mode comparing racial/ethnic groups (helicopter ambulance vs. ground ambulance). We used linear risk and log-binomial regression models and summarized the results as adjusted relative risk (RRadj), absolute risk difference (RDadj) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To account for clinical characteristics that could influence the decision to use helicopter transport, the propensity score models controlled for age, sex, hospital teaching status, American College of Surgeons verification level, state designation, hospital bed size, patient's primary insurance, injury intentionality, injury mechanism, chronic complex condition, body region, injury severity score, EMS reported Glasgow coma scale, heart rate and systolic blood pressure, and a distance indicator between injury site and receiving hospital.

Result

Helicopter transport was associated with a lower mortality risk compared to ground transport (RRadj: 0.86, 95%CI: 0.79 to 0.93, P-value < 0.001). Despite the mortality benefits of helicopter utilization, non-Hispanic Black children were 50% relative less likely to be air transported, compared to Non-Hispanic White children (20.0% vs. 33.6%, RDadj: -20.0%, 95% CI: -22.0 to -18.0, P-value < 0.001). Similarly, Non-Hispanic Others (24.7% vs. 33.6%, RDadj: -11.0%, 95% CI: -14.0 to -8.0%, P-value < 0.001), and Hispanics (24.0% vs. 33.6%, RDadj: -11.0%, 95% CI: -13.0 to -10.0%, P-value < 0.001) were both less likely to be air transported compared to Non-Hispanic White children—Figure 1. We found no statistical evidence of narrowing of the disparity gap during the study period (likelihood ratio test for the interaction between race/ethnicity and year, P-value = 0.180)

Conclusion

Despite the clear survival benefits of helicopter transport in severe trauma situations, minority populations are less likely to be airlifted compared to White children. These disparities have not narrowed over time, challenging the effectiveness of current efforts to expand helicopter ambulance programs. As pediatric trauma care continues to evolve, it is our collective responsibility to ensure that access to rapid and life-saving care is not – advertently or inadvertently – affected by non-clinical needs such as race and ethnicity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严重受伤儿童使用直升机运输的种族和民族差异
导言在美国,创伤是导致儿科死亡的主要原因。在重伤情况下,每一秒都在为最大限度地提高存活率而努力,"黄金一小时 "的概念概括了这一紧迫性。在这种情况下,直升机空中救护是紧急医疗服务系统的重要组成部分,它缩短了重伤患者获得最终治疗的时间。然而,美国创伤治疗结果中持续存在的种族和民族差异引发了人们的疑问:种族或民族等非临床因素是否会影响救生干预措施的部署,例如对严重受伤儿童的空中转运。在这项研究中,我们评估了严重儿科创伤后直升机救护的风险调整使用是否存在种族或民族差异。我们还评估了不同种族和民族的儿童在直升机使用方面的差距是否随着时间的推移而开始缩小或扩大。方法我们利用美国国家创伤数据库(NTDB)在 2017 年至 2022 年期间的数据,开展了一项基于人口、1:1 倾向性分数匹配的回顾性队列研究。我们的队列中包括 42812 名儿童(15 岁),他们都曾在急诊科就诊,并被送往一级或二级创伤中心的手术室或重症监护室。我们的主要结果是比较种族/族裔群体(直升机救护车与地面救护车)的风险调整后转运模式。我们使用了线性风险和对数二项式回归模型,并将结果总结为调整后的相对风险 (RRadj)、绝对风险差异 (RDadj) 及其 95% 置信区间 (CI)。为了考虑可能影响使用直升机转运决定的临床特征,倾向得分模型控制了年龄、性别、医院教学状况、美国外科学院验证级别、州指定、医院床位大小、患者的主要保险、受伤意图、受伤机制、慢性复杂情况、身体部位、受伤严重程度评分、EMS 报告的格拉斯哥昏迷量表、心率和收缩压以及受伤地点与接收医院之间的距离指标。结果与地面转运相比,直升机转运的死亡率风险较低(RRadj:0.86,95%CI:0.79 至 0.93,P 值为 0.001)。尽管使用直升机可降低死亡率,但与非西班牙裔白人儿童相比,非西班牙裔黑人儿童接受空中转运的可能性相对降低了 50%(20.0% vs. 33.6%,RDadj:-20.0%,95% CI:-22.0 to -18.0,P 值为 0.001)。同样,与非西班牙裔白人儿童相比,非西班牙裔其他儿童(24.7% vs. 33.6%,RDadj:-11.0%,95% CI:-14.0 到 -8.0%,P-value < 0.001)和西班牙裔儿童(24.0% vs. 33.6%,RDadj:-11.0%,95% CI:-13.0 到 -10.0%,P-value < 0.001)被空运的可能性都更小--图 1。我们没有发现在研究期间差距缩小的统计证据(种族/族裔与年份之间交互作用的似然比检验,P 值 = 0.180)。这些差距并没有随着时间的推移而缩小,这对目前扩大直升机救护项目的有效性提出了挑战。随着儿科创伤护理的不断发展,我们有责任确保获得快速救生护理的机会不会有意或无意地受到种族和民族等非临床需求的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent. The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.
期刊最新文献
Sickle cell disease: Contributing factors and radiological assessments Sialadenitis of the anterior mandibular vestibule: A subset of burning mouth syndrome A review of the risks and relationships between oral health and chronic diseases A cross sectional analysis of residents by race/ethnicity and specialty from 2020-2023 The association between heart failure and systemic inflammatory response index: A cross‐sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1