Identifying students with dyslexia: exploration of current assessment methods.

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Annals of Dyslexia Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1007/s11881-024-00313-y
Johny Daniel, Lauryn Clucas, Hsuan-Hui Wang
{"title":"Identifying students with dyslexia: exploration of current assessment methods.","authors":"Johny Daniel, Lauryn Clucas, Hsuan-Hui Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11881-024-00313-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early identification plays a crucial role in providing timely support to students with learning disabilities, such as dyslexia, in order to overcome their reading difficulties. However, there is significant variability in the methods used for identifying dyslexia. This study aimed to explore and understand the practices of dyslexia identification in the UK. A survey was conducted among 274 dyslexia professionals, including educational psychologists and dyslexia specialists, to investigate the types of assessments they employ, their approach to utilizing assessment data, their decision-making processes, and their conceptualization of dyslexia. Additionally, the study examined whether these professionals held any misconceptions or myths associated with dyslexia. Analysis of the survey data revealed substantial variability in how professionals conceptualize dyslexia, as well as variations in assessment methods. Furthermore, a significant proportion of the survey respondents subscribed to one or more misconceptions regarding dyslexia; the most common misconception identified among professionals was the belief that children with dyslexia read letters in reverse order. The findings highlight the need for standardized approaches to dyslexia identification and debunking prevailing misconceptions. The implications of these findings are discussed, emphasizing the importance of informed policy and practice in supporting students with dyslexia. Recommendations are provided to enhance consistency and accuracy in dyslexia identification, with the aim of facilitating early intervention and support for affected students.</p>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-024-00313-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early identification plays a crucial role in providing timely support to students with learning disabilities, such as dyslexia, in order to overcome their reading difficulties. However, there is significant variability in the methods used for identifying dyslexia. This study aimed to explore and understand the practices of dyslexia identification in the UK. A survey was conducted among 274 dyslexia professionals, including educational psychologists and dyslexia specialists, to investigate the types of assessments they employ, their approach to utilizing assessment data, their decision-making processes, and their conceptualization of dyslexia. Additionally, the study examined whether these professionals held any misconceptions or myths associated with dyslexia. Analysis of the survey data revealed substantial variability in how professionals conceptualize dyslexia, as well as variations in assessment methods. Furthermore, a significant proportion of the survey respondents subscribed to one or more misconceptions regarding dyslexia; the most common misconception identified among professionals was the belief that children with dyslexia read letters in reverse order. The findings highlight the need for standardized approaches to dyslexia identification and debunking prevailing misconceptions. The implications of these findings are discussed, emphasizing the importance of informed policy and practice in supporting students with dyslexia. Recommendations are provided to enhance consistency and accuracy in dyslexia identification, with the aim of facilitating early intervention and support for affected students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别有阅读障碍的学生:探索当前的评估方法。
早期识别对于为有学习障碍(如阅读障碍)的学生提供及时的支持以克服他们的阅读困难起着至关重要的作用。然而,识别读写困难的方法存在很大差异。本研究旨在探索和了解英国在识别阅读障碍方面的做法。研究人员对包括教育心理学家和阅读障碍专家在内的 274 名阅读障碍专业人员进行了调查,以了解他们采用的评估类型、利用评估数据的方法、决策过程以及对阅读障碍的概念化。此外,研究还考察了这些专业人员是否持有与阅读障碍相关的误解或神话。对调查数据的分析表明,专业人员对阅读障碍的概念以及评估方法存在很大差异。此外,相当一部分调查对象认同一种或多种与阅读障碍有关的错误观念;专业人员中最常见的错误观念是认为阅读障碍儿童阅读字母时顺序颠倒。调查结果表明,有必要采用标准化的方法来识别阅读障碍,并消除普遍存在的误解。我们讨论了这些发现的影响,强调了在支持有阅读障碍的学生时,知情政策和实践的重要性。研究还提出了一些建议,以提高阅读障碍识别的一致性和准确性,从而促进对受影响学生的早期干预和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting the definition of dyslexia. Do we really need a new definition of dyslexia? A commentary. The critical role of instructional response in defining and identifying students with dyslexia: a case for updating existing definitions. An interdisciplinary perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of the International Dyslexia Association definition of dyslexia. Dyslexia in the twenty-first century: a commentary on the IDA definition of dyslexia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1