首页 > 最新文献

Annals of Dyslexia最新文献

英文 中文
Alphabet learning and the uppercase facilitation effect. 字母学习与大写促进效应。
IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1007/s11881-025-00360-z
Somin Park, Shayne B Piasta

Alphabet knowledge is a vital learning target during early childhood, including for children who are at risk for reading difficulties. For these children, we need to provide effective, efficient, evidence-based instruction. In this study, we examined the uppercase facilitation effect (i.e., children are more likely to identify lowercase letters when they know the corresponding uppercase forms) in the context of alphabet learning and thus its potential to be leveraged as an instructional strategy. Thirty-six 3:5 to 5:5 years old children at risk for reading difficulties due to low alphabet knowledge (18 girls; 50 months old on average; 22 English monolinguals and 14 emergent bilinguals) participated in a within-subjects experiment. Children received 1:1 alphabet instruction on individually selected letters, with other letters serving as controls. We evaluated participating children's letter name and sound production pre- and post-instruction. We accounted for letters being nested within each child using multilevel logistic regression. Children were more likely to know lowercase letters if they knew the corresponding uppercase letters, regardless of whether the letters were taught or not taught. The uppercase facilitation effect did not apply in the context of alphabet learning. We discuss instructional implications.

字母知识是幼儿时期的重要学习目标,对于有阅读困难风险的儿童也是如此。对于这些孩子,我们需要提供有效、高效、基于证据的教育。在本研究中,我们研究了字母学习背景下的大写促进效应(即,当儿童知道相应的大写形式时,他们更有可能识别小写字母),从而将其作为一种教学策略加以利用。36名因字母知识不足而存在阅读困难风险的3:5 ~ 5:5岁儿童(18名女孩,平均50个月大,22名英语单语儿童和14名突发性双语儿童)参加了一项受试者内实验。孩子们接受一对一的字母指导,分别选择字母,其他字母作为对照。我们评估了参与的儿童在教学前后的字母名称和发音。我们使用多层逻辑回归解释了每个子节点中嵌套的字母。如果孩子们知道相应的大写字母,他们就更有可能认识小写字母,无论这些字母是否教过。大写促进效应在字母学习中不存在。我们讨论教学意义。
{"title":"Alphabet learning and the uppercase facilitation effect.","authors":"Somin Park, Shayne B Piasta","doi":"10.1007/s11881-025-00360-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-025-00360-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alphabet knowledge is a vital learning target during early childhood, including for children who are at risk for reading difficulties. For these children, we need to provide effective, efficient, evidence-based instruction. In this study, we examined the uppercase facilitation effect (i.e., children are more likely to identify lowercase letters when they know the corresponding uppercase forms) in the context of alphabet learning and thus its potential to be leveraged as an instructional strategy. Thirty-six 3:5 to 5:5 years old children at risk for reading difficulties due to low alphabet knowledge (18 girls; 50 months old on average; 22 English monolinguals and 14 emergent bilinguals) participated in a within-subjects experiment. Children received 1:1 alphabet instruction on individually selected letters, with other letters serving as controls. We evaluated participating children's letter name and sound production pre- and post-instruction. We accounted for letters being nested within each child using multilevel logistic regression. Children were more likely to know lowercase letters if they knew the corresponding uppercase letters, regardless of whether the letters were taught or not taught. The uppercase facilitation effect did not apply in the context of alphabet learning. We discuss instructional implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Event-related potentials in the "Triangle" framework of reading and developmental dyslexia: a systematic review. 阅读与发展性阅读障碍“三角”框架中的事件相关电位:系统回顾。
IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-12-13 DOI: 10.1007/s11881-025-00353-y
Silvia Siu-Yin Clement-Lam, Oliver Lasnick, Brianna Kinnie, Ayan Mitra, Cheryl Lyon, Devin Kearns, Fumiko Hoeft

Event-related potentials (ERPs) are widely used to investigate the neural underpinnings of reading and developmental dyslexia, yet there are significant disparities in methodological approach. This poses a challenge for generalizability and interpretation. This systematic review synthesizes studies that investigate ERPs associated with cognitive-linguistic correlates of reading and dyslexia in the "triangle" framework of reading: orthography, phonology, and semantics. Using the 2020 PRISMA guidelines, we performed title/abstract and full-text screening of 1,286 papers identified via database search. Included studies (N = 56) were categorized in terms of the cognitive-linguistic processes examined: (1) orthographic (including lexico-orthographic processing), (2) phonological, (3) orthographic-phonological (integration/processing), and/or (4) semantic. This comprehensive review synthesizes prominent ERP components and time windows that characterize these processes. Across studies, individuals with dyslexia generally exhibit atypical ERP responses during orthography and phonology, whereas results for semantic processing are ambiguous and underexplored. Nonetheless, inconsistencies across studies were noted, and quality assessment indicates a greater need for transparency in methods/results reporting, that is critical for reproducible sciences in dyslexia research.

事件相关电位(ERPs)被广泛用于研究阅读和发展性阅读障碍的神经基础,但在方法上存在显著差异。这对概括性和解释提出了挑战。这篇系统的综述综合了在阅读的“三角”框架(正字法、音韵学和语义学)中研究与阅读和阅读障碍的认知语言相关的erp的研究。使用2020年PRISMA指南,我们对通过数据库检索确定的1,286篇论文进行了标题/摘要和全文筛选。纳入的研究(N = 56)根据所检查的认知语言过程进行分类:(1)正字法(包括词汇-正字法加工),(2)音系,(3)正字法-音系(整合/加工),和/或(4)语义学。这篇全面的综述综合了突出的ERP组件和表征这些过程的时间窗口。在所有研究中,阅读障碍患者通常在正字法和音韵学上表现出非典型的ERP反应,而语义处理的结果则不明确且未被充分探索。尽管如此,研究之间的不一致性被注意到,质量评估表明更需要方法/结果报告的透明度,这对于阅读障碍研究中的可重复性科学至关重要。
{"title":"Event-related potentials in the \"Triangle\" framework of reading and developmental dyslexia: a systematic review.","authors":"Silvia Siu-Yin Clement-Lam, Oliver Lasnick, Brianna Kinnie, Ayan Mitra, Cheryl Lyon, Devin Kearns, Fumiko Hoeft","doi":"10.1007/s11881-025-00353-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11881-025-00353-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Event-related potentials (ERPs) are widely used to investigate the neural underpinnings of reading and developmental dyslexia, yet there are significant disparities in methodological approach. This poses a challenge for generalizability and interpretation. This systematic review synthesizes studies that investigate ERPs associated with cognitive-linguistic correlates of reading and dyslexia in the \"triangle\" framework of reading: orthography, phonology, and semantics. Using the 2020 PRISMA guidelines, we performed title/abstract and full-text screening of 1,286 papers identified via database search. Included studies (N = 56) were categorized in terms of the cognitive-linguistic processes examined: (1) orthographic (including lexico-orthographic processing), (2) phonological, (3) orthographic-phonological (integration/processing), and/or (4) semantic. This comprehensive review synthesizes prominent ERP components and time windows that characterize these processes. Across studies, individuals with dyslexia generally exhibit atypical ERP responses during orthography and phonology, whereas results for semantic processing are ambiguous and underexplored. Nonetheless, inconsistencies across studies were noted, and quality assessment indicates a greater need for transparency in methods/results reporting, that is critical for reproducible sciences in dyslexia research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12854077/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Challenging school-related situations faced by students with dyslexia: a scoping review. 阅读障碍学生面临的挑战性学校相关情况:范围审查。
IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.1007/s11881-025-00356-9
Julia Mori, Katharina Prinz, Ursula Fischer, Liliana Tönnissen, Claudia Hofmann, Jennifer Plank, Dennis Hövel, Alfred Schabmann, Barbara Gasteiger-Klicpera, Barbara M Schmidt

Children and young people with dyslexia face a variety of challenges in everyday school life, which can affect their intellectual and emotional development. While the potential consequences of dyslexia are well-documented, little is known about the specific challenging situations in the school context these children face. This scoping review addresses this gap by systematically identifying and categorising school-related stressors experienced by students with dyslexia. A literature search between 2000 and 2025 was conducted via EBSCOhost across five databases in the fields of education and psychology. A total of 30 peer-reviewed studies were included for full-text analysis. The majority of studies (n = 23) were qualitative, complemented by quantitative (n = 4) and mixed-method studies (n = 3). All participants had a formal diagnosis of dyslexia and described their school-related experiences either currently or retrospectively. The reported school-related challenging situations were assigned to two main categories: social environment and student-related stressors. Many typical school routines-such as reading aloud in front of the class, peer comparisons, or public error correction-emerged as particularly distressing. These practices are rarely questioned but can lead to humiliation, anxiety, and fear of failure for students with dyslexia. Recognising the subjective experiences of students with dyslexia offers valuable insights for developing more inclusive educational practices and targeted socio-emotional support.

患有阅读障碍的儿童和青少年在日常的学校生活中面临着各种各样的挑战,这可能会影响他们的智力和情感发展。虽然阅读障碍的潜在后果是有据可查的,但人们对这些孩子在学校环境中面临的具体挑战情况知之甚少。本综述通过系统地识别和分类阅读障碍学生所经历的与学校相关的压力源来解决这一差距。通过EBSCOhost在教育和心理学领域的五个数据库中进行了2000年至2025年的文献检索。共有30项同行评议的研究被纳入全文分析。大多数研究(n = 23)为定性研究,辅以定量研究(n = 4)和混合方法研究(n = 3)。所有参与者都有阅读障碍的正式诊断,并描述了他们当前或回顾性的学校相关经历。报告的与学校有关的挑战情况被分为两大类:社会环境和与学生有关的压力源。许多典型的学校惯例——比如在全班同学面前大声朗读、同辈比较或公开纠错——都显得特别令人苦恼。这些做法很少受到质疑,但却会给患有阅读障碍的学生带来羞辱、焦虑和对失败的恐惧。认识到患有阅读障碍的学生的主观经历,为开发更具包容性的教育实践和有针对性的社会情感支持提供了有价值的见解。
{"title":"Challenging school-related situations faced by students with dyslexia: a scoping review.","authors":"Julia Mori, Katharina Prinz, Ursula Fischer, Liliana Tönnissen, Claudia Hofmann, Jennifer Plank, Dennis Hövel, Alfred Schabmann, Barbara Gasteiger-Klicpera, Barbara M Schmidt","doi":"10.1007/s11881-025-00356-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-025-00356-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children and young people with dyslexia face a variety of challenges in everyday school life, which can affect their intellectual and emotional development. While the potential consequences of dyslexia are well-documented, little is known about the specific challenging situations in the school context these children face. This scoping review addresses this gap by systematically identifying and categorising school-related stressors experienced by students with dyslexia. A literature search between 2000 and 2025 was conducted via EBSCOhost across five databases in the fields of education and psychology. A total of 30 peer-reviewed studies were included for full-text analysis. The majority of studies (n = 23) were qualitative, complemented by quantitative (n = 4) and mixed-method studies (n = 3). All participants had a formal diagnosis of dyslexia and described their school-related experiences either currently or retrospectively. The reported school-related challenging situations were assigned to two main categories: social environment and student-related stressors. Many typical school routines-such as reading aloud in front of the class, peer comparisons, or public error correction-emerged as particularly distressing. These practices are rarely questioned but can lead to humiliation, anxiety, and fear of failure for students with dyslexia. Recognising the subjective experiences of students with dyslexia offers valuable insights for developing more inclusive educational practices and targeted socio-emotional support.</p>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aetiologies of basic biliteracy difficulties in Hong Kong Chinese children: A latent profile analysis with twin data. 香港中文儿童基本双语读写困难的病因分析:基于双数据的潜在特征分析。
IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1007/s11881-025-00355-w
Shuting Huo, Anna Jia-Jun Zhang, Mo Zheng, Urs Maurer, Catherine McBride, Tomohiro Inoue

The present study examined 1) basic biliteracy difficulty subtypes in Chinese (L1) and English (L2) Hong Kong Chinese children, 2) genetic-versus-environmental aetiologies for the subtypes, and 3) the moderating role of SES and school language use in the aetiologies. Four hundred fifty-six twin pairs (91.08 ± 13.20 months, 50% female) were assessed on Chinese and English word reading and spelling skills. Results of latent profile analysis identified four biliteracy profiles: 51.2% Chinese-dominant learners (CDL), 17.0% poor biliterate learners (PBL), 12.4% English-poor Chinese-dominant learners (EPCDL), and 19.4% English-dominant learners (EDL). Focusing on the difficulty profiles, results of familial resemblance showed that the additive genetic factor (55%) contributed more than the environmental factors to the probability of PBL, while the shared environmental factors (56%) contributed more than the genetic (25%) and unique environmental factors to the probability of EPCDL. Low SES was associated with a higher probability of PBL and EPCDL, and it exacerbated the genetic contribution to both difficulty profiles. The current findings suggest the influence of environmental factors underlying basic biliteracy difficulties, although we cannot rule out the possibility of high heritability, which appears to be the case for both L1 Chinese and L2 English.

本研究考察了1)香港中文儿童中文(L1)和英语(L2)的基本双语困难亚型,2)这些亚型的遗传与环境病因,以及3)社会经济地位和学校语言使用在病因中的调节作用。对456对双胞胎(91.08±13.20个月,女性占50%)进行中英文单词阅读和拼写能力评估。结果发现了四种双语能力特征:51.2%的汉语优势学习者(CDL)、17.0%的低双语能力学习者(PBL)、12.4%的低英语优势学习者(EPCDL)和19.4%的英语优势学习者(EDL)。在难度谱上,家族相似性结果显示,加性遗传因素(55%)对PBL发生概率的贡献大于环境因素,而共享环境因素(56%)对EPCDL发生概率的贡献大于遗传因素(25%)和独特环境因素(56%)。低SES与PBL和EPCDL的高概率相关,并加剧了这两种困难概况的遗传贡献。目前的研究结果表明,环境因素对基本双语困难的影响,尽管我们不能排除高遗传性的可能性,这似乎是母语汉语和第二语言英语的情况。
{"title":"Aetiologies of basic biliteracy difficulties in Hong Kong Chinese children: A latent profile analysis with twin data.","authors":"Shuting Huo, Anna Jia-Jun Zhang, Mo Zheng, Urs Maurer, Catherine McBride, Tomohiro Inoue","doi":"10.1007/s11881-025-00355-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-025-00355-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study examined 1) basic biliteracy difficulty subtypes in Chinese (L1) and English (L2) Hong Kong Chinese children, 2) genetic-versus-environmental aetiologies for the subtypes, and 3) the moderating role of SES and school language use in the aetiologies. Four hundred fifty-six twin pairs (91.08 ± 13.20 months, 50% female) were assessed on Chinese and English word reading and spelling skills. Results of latent profile analysis identified four biliteracy profiles: 51.2% Chinese-dominant learners (CDL), 17.0% poor biliterate learners (PBL), 12.4% English-poor Chinese-dominant learners (EPCDL), and 19.4% English-dominant learners (EDL). Focusing on the difficulty profiles, results of familial resemblance showed that the additive genetic factor (55%) contributed more than the environmental factors to the probability of PBL, while the shared environmental factors (56%) contributed more than the genetic (25%) and unique environmental factors to the probability of EPCDL. Low SES was associated with a higher probability of PBL and EPCDL, and it exacerbated the genetic contribution to both difficulty profiles. The current findings suggest the influence of environmental factors underlying basic biliteracy difficulties, although we cannot rule out the possibility of high heritability, which appears to be the case for both L1 Chinese and L2 English.</p>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145679120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Kindergarten predictors of dyslexia pathways in Hebrew: a 5-year longitudinal study. 希伯来语阅读障碍途径的幼儿园预测因素:一项为期5年的纵向研究。
IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1007/s11881-025-00354-x
Rotem Yinon, Dana Tal, Shelley Shaul, Yaniv Kanat-Maymon, Tami Katzir

While dyslexia is often considered a uniformly persistent condition, research has identified two additional developmental pathways: resolving and late-emerging dyslexia. Yet, most studies have focused on Western languages, and only a few have examined kindergarten predictors of these pathways, with morphological awareness largely overlooked. This five-year longitudinal study examined dyslexia pathways and their kindergarten predictors, including morphological awareness, in Hebrew-a Semitic language with distinct orthographic and morphological features. A cohort of 515 Hebrew-speaking children was followed from kindergarten through Grades 1 and 4. Dyslexia pathways were classified using dual cut-off criteria (≤ 16th percentile for dyslexia, ≥ 25th percentile for typical readers) based on word-reading fluency in Grades 1 and 4. Kindergarten measures included phonological awareness, letter knowledge, rapid automatized naming, and morphological awareness. Among children with dyslexia, three pathways were identified: persistent (35%), resolving (33%), and late-emerging (32%). Multinomial logistic regression, with typically developing readers as the reference group, revealed distinct kindergarten predictors. Letter knowledge deficits characterized all pathways. Phonological awareness predicted persistent and resolving dyslexia. Rapid naming predicted only persistent dyslexia, distinguishing it from resolving dyslexia. Morphological awareness uniquely predicted late-emerging dyslexia. These findings extend dyslexia pathway research to Semitic languages, showing how typological features shape pathway prevalence. They provide the first evidence that kindergarten morphological awareness deficits uniquely predict late-emerging dyslexia, demonstrating how the universal phonological-to-morphological shift in reading manifests in dyslexia trajectories and underscoring the need for comprehensive early screening approaches.

虽然阅读障碍通常被认为是一种统一的持续状态,但研究已经确定了两种额外的发展途径:消退性阅读障碍和迟发性阅读障碍。然而,大多数研究都集中在西方语言上,只有少数研究了这些途径的幼儿园预测因素,形态学意识在很大程度上被忽视了。这项为期五年的纵向研究考察了阅读障碍的途径及其幼儿园预测因素,包括希伯来语的形态学意识。希伯来语是一种具有明显正字法和形态学特征的闪族语言。一组515名讲希伯来语的儿童从幼儿园到一年级和四年级进行了跟踪调查。基于1年级和4年级的单词阅读流畅性,使用双截止标准(阅读障碍≤16百分位,典型读者≥25百分位)对阅读障碍通路进行分类。幼儿园测量包括语音意识、字母知识、快速自动命名和形态意识。在患有阅读障碍的儿童中,确定了三种途径:持续性(35%)、消退性(33%)和迟发性(32%)。多项逻辑回归,以典型发展的读者为参照组,揭示了不同的幼儿园预测因子。字母知识缺陷是所有途径的特征。语音意识预测持续和解决阅读障碍。快速命名只能预测持续性阅读障碍,将其与解决性阅读障碍区分开来。形态意识独特地预测晚期出现的阅读障碍。这些发现将阅读障碍通路的研究扩展到闪族语言,显示了类型学特征如何影响通路的流行。他们提供了第一个证据,证明幼儿园形态意识缺陷独特地预测了后期出现的阅读障碍,展示了阅读中普遍的语音到形态的转变如何在阅读障碍的轨迹中表现出来,并强调了全面的早期筛查方法的必要性。
{"title":"Kindergarten predictors of dyslexia pathways in Hebrew: a 5-year longitudinal study.","authors":"Rotem Yinon, Dana Tal, Shelley Shaul, Yaniv Kanat-Maymon, Tami Katzir","doi":"10.1007/s11881-025-00354-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-025-00354-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While dyslexia is often considered a uniformly persistent condition, research has identified two additional developmental pathways: resolving and late-emerging dyslexia. Yet, most studies have focused on Western languages, and only a few have examined kindergarten predictors of these pathways, with morphological awareness largely overlooked. This five-year longitudinal study examined dyslexia pathways and their kindergarten predictors, including morphological awareness, in Hebrew-a Semitic language with distinct orthographic and morphological features. A cohort of 515 Hebrew-speaking children was followed from kindergarten through Grades 1 and 4. Dyslexia pathways were classified using dual cut-off criteria (≤ 16th percentile for dyslexia, ≥ 25th percentile for typical readers) based on word-reading fluency in Grades 1 and 4. Kindergarten measures included phonological awareness, letter knowledge, rapid automatized naming, and morphological awareness. Among children with dyslexia, three pathways were identified: persistent (35%), resolving (33%), and late-emerging (32%). Multinomial logistic regression, with typically developing readers as the reference group, revealed distinct kindergarten predictors. Letter knowledge deficits characterized all pathways. Phonological awareness predicted persistent and resolving dyslexia. Rapid naming predicted only persistent dyslexia, distinguishing it from resolving dyslexia. Morphological awareness uniquely predicted late-emerging dyslexia. These findings extend dyslexia pathway research to Semitic languages, showing how typological features shape pathway prevalence. They provide the first evidence that kindergarten morphological awareness deficits uniquely predict late-emerging dyslexia, demonstrating how the universal phonological-to-morphological shift in reading manifests in dyslexia trajectories and underscoring the need for comprehensive early screening approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145606892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
(Not so) universal literacy screening: a survey of educators reveals variability in implementation (并非如此)普遍扫盲筛查:一项对教育工作者的调查揭示了实施的可变性。
IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-10-29 DOI: 10.1007/s11881-025-00342-1
Ola Ozernov-Palchik, Zoe Elizee, Fabio Catania, Meral Hacikamiloglu, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, Yaacov Petscher, Satrajit Ghosh, John D. E. Gabrieli

Currently, most states in the United States have enacted legislation mandating universal screening for literacy risk in kindergarten through 3rd grade. However, the degree to which these policies translate into consistent, high-quality screening practices remains unclear. In this survey study, we collected responses from a diverse sample of K–3 educators (N = 251) across 39 states, representing varied school types, professional roles, and experience levels, to examine the real-world implementation of universal screening. Guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework, we analyzed quantitative and qualitative data to identify real-world factors that could impede the fidelity and effectiveness of screening implementation. We found substantial variability across multiple dimensions of literacy screening implementation. Educators described considerable variation in screener selection, administration practices, testing environments, training quality, scoring accuracy, and the use of results to guide intervention. Notably, many indicated insufficient training and professional development, expressing uncertainty about administering and interpreting screeners, particularly for English language learners. Nearly half also reported the absence of systematic procedures for developing intervention plans, suggesting that many students identified as at risk do not receive appropriate follow-up support. These implementation challenges occurred despite widespread recognition among educators of screening’s importance for early literacy intervention. Educators from lower-socioeconomic status schools reported significantly greater time burdens in conducting screenings and more technology-related challenges compared to their higher-SES counterparts. Without systematic improvements to implementation support and training, current screening initiatives may fail to achieve their intended goal of early identification and intervention for struggling readers.

目前,美国的大多数州都颁布了立法,要求对幼儿园到三年级的扫盲风险进行普遍筛查。然而,这些政策在多大程度上转化为一致的、高质量的筛查实践仍不清楚。在这项调查研究中,我们收集了来自39个州的K-3教育工作者(N = 251)的不同样本的回复,代表了不同的学校类型、专业角色和经验水平,以检查普遍筛查在现实世界中的实施情况。在探索、准备、实施和维持(EPIS)框架的指导下,我们分析了定量和定性数据,以确定可能阻碍筛选实施的保真度和有效性的现实因素。我们发现扫盲筛查实施的多个维度存在显著差异。教育工作者描述了在筛选者选择、管理实践、测试环境、培训质量、评分准确性和使用结果来指导干预方面的相当大的差异。值得注意的是,许多人表示培训和专业发展不足,对管理和口译筛选人员表示不确定,特别是对英语学习者。近一半的学生还报告说,缺乏制定干预计划的系统程序,这表明许多被认定有风险的学生没有得到适当的后续支持。尽管教育工作者普遍认识到筛查对早期识字干预的重要性,但这些实施方面的挑战仍然存在。与社会经济地位较高的学校相比,来自社会经济地位较低学校的教育工作者在进行筛查方面的时间负担和技术相关挑战明显更大。如果没有对实施支持和培训的系统改进,目前的筛查举措可能无法实现早期识别和干预困难读者的预期目标。
{"title":"(Not so) universal literacy screening: a survey of educators reveals variability in implementation","authors":"Ola Ozernov-Palchik,&nbsp;Zoe Elizee,&nbsp;Fabio Catania,&nbsp;Meral Hacikamiloglu,&nbsp;Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,&nbsp;Yaacov Petscher,&nbsp;Satrajit Ghosh,&nbsp;John D. E. Gabrieli","doi":"10.1007/s11881-025-00342-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11881-025-00342-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Currently, most states in the United States have enacted legislation mandating universal screening for literacy risk in kindergarten through 3rd grade. However, the degree to which these policies translate into consistent, high-quality screening practices remains unclear. In this survey study, we collected responses from a diverse sample of K–3 educators (<i>N</i> = 251) across 39 states, representing varied school types, professional roles, and experience levels, to examine the real-world implementation of universal screening. Guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework, we analyzed quantitative and qualitative data to identify real-world factors that could impede the fidelity and effectiveness of screening implementation. We found substantial variability across multiple dimensions of literacy screening implementation. Educators described considerable variation in screener selection, administration practices, testing environments, training quality, scoring accuracy, and the use of results to guide intervention. Notably, many indicated insufficient training and professional development, expressing uncertainty about administering and interpreting screeners, particularly for English language learners. Nearly half also reported the absence of systematic procedures for developing intervention plans, suggesting that many students identified as at risk do not receive appropriate follow-up support. These implementation challenges occurred despite widespread recognition among educators of screening’s importance for early literacy intervention. Educators from lower-socioeconomic status schools reported significantly greater time burdens in conducting screenings and more technology-related challenges compared to their higher-SES counterparts. Without systematic improvements to implementation support and training, current screening initiatives may fail to achieve their intended goal of early identification and intervention for struggling readers.\u0000</p>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"75 on","pages":"489 - 523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11881-025-00342-1.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145394111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pre-service teachers' knowledge of language and literacy concepts: The skeleton in Canada's closet? 职前教师的语言和读写概念知识:加拿大的秘密?
IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-10-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11881-025-00351-0
George K Georgiou, Abigail R Peyton, Andrea Antoniuk, Pamela Beach, Andrea Fraser, John R Kirby, Perry Klein, Guofang Li, Jamie Metsala, Amin Mousavi, Jodi Nickel, Robert Savage, R Malatesha Joshi

The overall goal of this study was to examine pre-service teachers' knowledge of language and literacy concepts across different provinces in Canada. Eight hundred and eighty-three pre-service teachers completed a survey measuring their knowledge of three literacy components (phonological awareness, phonics and morphology). Results showed first that they had an overall score of 65% in phonological awareness, 62% in phonics and 37% in morphology. Second, they did significantly better in questions of implicit knowledge than explicit knowledge. Finally, their ratings of perceived ability in teaching the aforementioned concepts correlated significantly (rs ranged from .24 to .30) with their respective knowledge score. Taken together, these results suggest that many Canadian pre-service teachers have a rather limited understanding of the basic language and literacy concepts, particularly in the area of morphology. Given that these scores are not much different than those reported in the literature 10 years ago, we recommend that more substantive measures are put in place to bring that required knowledge to our pre-service teachers.

本研究的总体目标是考察加拿大不同省份职前教师的语言和识字概念知识。883名职前教师完成了一项调查,测量了他们对三个识字组成部分(语音意识、语音和形态学)的知识。结果显示,首先,他们在语音意识上的总分为65%,在语音上的总分为62%,在词法上的总分为37%。其次,他们在内隐知识问题上的表现明显好于外显知识。最后,他们在教授上述概念方面的感知能力评分显著相关(分数范围从。24到。30)与各自的知识得分。综上所述,这些结果表明,许多加拿大职前教师对基本语言和识字概念的理解相当有限,特别是在形态学领域。鉴于这些分数与10年前的文献报告没有太大的不同,我们建议采取更实质性的措施,为我们的职前教师提供所需的知识。
{"title":"Pre-service teachers' knowledge of language and literacy concepts: The skeleton in Canada's closet?","authors":"George K Georgiou, Abigail R Peyton, Andrea Antoniuk, Pamela Beach, Andrea Fraser, John R Kirby, Perry Klein, Guofang Li, Jamie Metsala, Amin Mousavi, Jodi Nickel, Robert Savage, R Malatesha Joshi","doi":"10.1007/s11881-025-00351-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-025-00351-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The overall goal of this study was to examine pre-service teachers' knowledge of language and literacy concepts across different provinces in Canada. Eight hundred and eighty-three pre-service teachers completed a survey measuring their knowledge of three literacy components (phonological awareness, phonics and morphology). Results showed first that they had an overall score of 65% in phonological awareness, 62% in phonics and 37% in morphology. Second, they did significantly better in questions of implicit knowledge than explicit knowledge. Finally, their ratings of perceived ability in teaching the aforementioned concepts correlated significantly (rs ranged from .24 to .30) with their respective knowledge score. Taken together, these results suggest that many Canadian pre-service teachers have a rather limited understanding of the basic language and literacy concepts, particularly in the area of morphology. Given that these scores are not much different than those reported in the literature 10 years ago, we recommend that more substantive measures are put in place to bring that required knowledge to our pre-service teachers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Literacy legislation in practice: implementation, impact, and emerging lessons 实践中的扫盲立法:实施、影响和新出现的教训。
IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-10-22 DOI: 10.1007/s11881-025-00348-9
Timothy N. Odegard, Colby Hall, Katy Kloberdanz

In the past decade, states across the United States have enacted an unprecedented number of literacy laws, many of which have been spurred by growing awareness of dyslexia and calls to align instruction with the science of reading. These laws have reshaped policies on screening, curriculum adoption, educator preparation, and intervention. This Special Issue of Annals of Dyslexia contains eleven articles that collectively examine how literacy laws are being implemented, the opportunities and challenges they present, and their consequences for educators and students. Contributions include high-level analyses of dyslexia laws, state-level commentaries on implementation in Kansas and Ohio, survey-based studies of screening practices, reviews of curriculum adoption frameworks, investigations of preservice and in-service educator training, and an outcome study of identification rates and NAEP performance. Across these contributions, a central theme emerges: passing legislation is only the beginning. Effective impact depends on the systems, resources, and professional learning that carry policy into practice.

在过去的十年里,美国各州颁布了数量空前的扫盲法,其中许多都是由于人们对阅读障碍的意识日益增强,以及要求将教学与阅读科学结合起来的呼声。这些法律重塑了筛选、课程采用、教育工作者准备和干预方面的政策。本期《阅读障碍年鉴》特刊包含11篇文章,这些文章共同探讨了扫盲法是如何实施的,它们带来的机遇和挑战,以及它们对教育者和学生的影响。贡献包括对阅读障碍法律的高层次分析,对堪萨斯州和俄亥俄州实施情况的州级评论,基于调查的筛选实践研究,对课程采用框架的回顾,对职前和在职教育工作者培训的调查,以及对识别率和NAEP表现的结果研究。在这些贡献中,一个中心主题浮现出来:通过立法只是一个开始。有效的影响取决于将政策付诸实践的制度、资源和专业学习。
{"title":"Literacy legislation in practice: implementation, impact, and emerging lessons","authors":"Timothy N. Odegard,&nbsp;Colby Hall,&nbsp;Katy Kloberdanz","doi":"10.1007/s11881-025-00348-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11881-025-00348-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the past decade, states across the United States have enacted an unprecedented number of literacy laws, many of which have been spurred by growing awareness of dyslexia and calls to align instruction with the science of reading. These laws have reshaped policies on screening, curriculum adoption, educator preparation, and intervention. This Special Issue of <i>Annals of Dyslexia</i> contains eleven articles that collectively examine how literacy laws are being implemented, the opportunities and challenges they present, and their consequences for educators and students. Contributions include high-level analyses of dyslexia laws, state-level commentaries on implementation in Kansas and Ohio, survey-based studies of screening practices, reviews of curriculum adoption frameworks, investigations of preservice and in-service educator training, and an outcome study of identification rates and NAEP performance. Across these contributions, a central theme emerges: passing legislation is only the beginning. Effective impact depends on the systems, resources, and professional learning that carry policy into practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"75 on","pages":"401 - 409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145349202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Feasibility of an online module to prepare pre-service teachers to serve students with dyslexia 预备职前教师服务有阅读障碍的学生的在线模块的可行性。
IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-10-17 DOI: 10.1007/s11881-025-00349-8
Karen F. Kehoe, Katie Schrodt, Timothy N. Odegard

This case study describes the development and implementation of an online module designed to enhance pre-service teachers’ (PSTs) knowledge about dyslexia. The module includes information, including dyslexia’s history, primary characteristics, and secondary consequences, and issues related to the identification and instruction of students with risk or characteristics of dyslexia in the primary grades (kindergarten through second grade; K-2). Conceived of through a collaboration between an educator preparation program (EPP) and research center at a large, public university, the module was created in response to state dyslexia legislation requiring EPPs to better equip PSTs for serving students with risk indicators and characteristics of dyslexia in the elementary grades. Instructor and PST surveys, follow-up instructor interviews, and PST assessment data were analyzed through a feasibility lens. Although limited to a single case in a specific context, findings reveal important factors for other EPPs to consider prior to the development of similar training models that seek to improve pre-service teachers’ knowledge about dyslexia.

本案例研究描述了一个在线模块的开发和实施,旨在提高职前教师(PSTs)关于阅读障碍的知识。该模块包括信息,包括失读症的历史,主要特征,和次要后果,以及与识别和指导小学生(幼儿园到二年级;K-2)有失读症风险或特征的学生有关的问题。该模块是由教育工作者准备项目(EPP)和一所大型公立大学的研究中心合作构思的,是为了响应国家关于阅读障碍的立法,要求EPP更好地装备pst,为小学年级的学生提供阅读障碍的风险指标和特征。通过可行性视角分析教师和PST调查、后续教师访谈和PST评估数据。尽管仅限于特定背景下的单一案例,但研究结果揭示了其他epp在开发类似培训模式之前需要考虑的重要因素,这些培训模式旨在提高职前教师对阅读障碍的了解。
{"title":"Feasibility of an online module to prepare pre-service teachers to serve students with dyslexia","authors":"Karen F. Kehoe,&nbsp;Katie Schrodt,&nbsp;Timothy N. Odegard","doi":"10.1007/s11881-025-00349-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11881-025-00349-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This case study describes the development and implementation of an online module designed to enhance pre-service teachers’ (PSTs) knowledge about dyslexia. The module includes information, including dyslexia’s history, primary characteristics, and secondary consequences, and issues related to the identification and instruction of students with risk or characteristics of dyslexia in the primary grades (kindergarten through second grade; K-2). Conceived of through a collaboration between an educator preparation program (EPP) and research center at a large, public university, the module was created in response to state dyslexia legislation requiring EPPs to better equip PSTs for serving students with risk indicators and characteristics of dyslexia in the elementary grades. Instructor and PST surveys, follow-up instructor interviews, and PST assessment data were analyzed through a feasibility lens. Although limited to a single case in a specific context, findings reveal important factors for other EPPs to consider prior to the development of similar training models that seek to improve pre-service teachers’ knowledge about dyslexia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"75 on","pages":"564 - 591"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145313783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From taskforce to blueprint: implementation of literacy policy in Kansas 从专案组到蓝图:堪萨斯州扫盲政策的实施。
IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-10-13 DOI: 10.1007/s11881-025-00340-3
David P. Hurford, Alex C. Fender, Michaela R. Ozier, Molly J. Baumgardner, Cynthia R. Lane, Laurie J. Curtis

The Kansas Legislative Task Force on Dyslexia was established in 2018 to advise and make recommendations to educators, administrators, and policymakers in Kansas. The Kansas State Department of Education adopted the recommendations of the Task Force by creating a position to coordinate issues related to dyslexia, developing and publishing the Kansas Dyslexia Handbook, addressing professional development requirements, and universal screening protocols for dyslexia were created, published, and modified. New accreditation standards for colleges of education and school districts were created that were aligned with the Knowledge and Practice Standards of the International Dyslexia Association. In July 2023, Structured Literacy was named in the state’s eligibility indicators for special education and related services for students with dyslexia (KSDE, 2023b). In April 2024, Kansas Senate Bill 438 was signed into law by Governor Laura Kelly, delineating the Kansas Blueprint for Literacy and including funding to be applied to state literacy and education workforce development. This comprehensive initiative establishes a literacy advisory committee, aligns teacher training and curricular materials with Structured Literacy, prohibits the use of discredited methodologies, develops a plan for six centers to be housed across the state for direct and indirect services, and sets teacher training and student performance goals for the state. The Kansas Blueprint for Literacy requires collaboration from various stakeholders, including educators, school systems, teacher trainers, literacy experts, parents, businesses, and policymakers, to systematically improve teacher training and student literacy instruction in the state. We review the history of recent literacy legislation in Kansas and describe the cyclical process through which practice has informed policy, which has informed practice. Finally, we will report on the state’s progress to date in achieving its goals.

堪萨斯州阅读障碍立法工作组成立于2018年,旨在为堪萨斯州的教育工作者、管理人员和政策制定者提供建议和建议。堪萨斯州教育部采纳了工作组的建议,设立了一个职位来协调与阅读障碍有关的问题,开发和出版了《堪萨斯州阅读障碍手册》,解决了专业发展要求,并创建、出版和修改了阅读障碍的普遍筛查方案。为教育学院和学区制定了新的认证标准,与国际阅读障碍协会的知识和实践标准保持一致。2023年7月,结构化扫盲被列入该州为患有阅读障碍的学生提供特殊教育和相关服务的资格指标(KSDE, 2023b)。2024年4月,堪萨斯州州长劳拉·凯利(Laura Kelly)签署了堪萨斯州参议院第438号法案,该法案描绘了堪萨斯州扫盲蓝图,并包括用于州扫盲和教育劳动力发展的资金。这项全面的倡议建立了一个扫盲咨询委员会,将教师培训和课程材料与结构化扫盲相结合,禁止使用不可信的方法,制定了在全州设立六个中心的计划,以提供直接和间接服务,并为该州制定了教师培训和学生表现目标。《堪萨斯州扫盲蓝图》要求教育者、学校系统、教师培训师、扫盲专家、家长、企业和政策制定者等各利益相关方通力合作,系统地改善该州的教师培训和学生扫盲教学。我们回顾了堪萨斯州近期扫盲立法的历史,并描述了实践影响政策、政策影响实践的周期性过程。最后,我们将报告该州迄今在实现其目标方面的进展。
{"title":"From taskforce to blueprint: implementation of literacy policy in Kansas","authors":"David P. Hurford,&nbsp;Alex C. Fender,&nbsp;Michaela R. Ozier,&nbsp;Molly J. Baumgardner,&nbsp;Cynthia R. Lane,&nbsp;Laurie J. Curtis","doi":"10.1007/s11881-025-00340-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11881-025-00340-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Kansas Legislative Task Force on Dyslexia was established in 2018 to advise and make recommendations to educators, administrators, and policymakers in Kansas. The Kansas State Department of Education adopted the recommendations of the Task Force by creating a position to coordinate issues related to dyslexia, developing and publishing the <i>Kansas Dyslexia Handbook</i>, addressing professional development requirements, and universal screening protocols for dyslexia were created, published, and modified. New accreditation standards for colleges of education and school districts were created that were aligned with the Knowledge and Practice Standards of the International Dyslexia Association. In July 2023, Structured Literacy was named in the state’s eligibility indicators for special education and related services for students with dyslexia (KSDE, 2023b). In April 2024, Kansas Senate Bill 438 was signed into law by Governor Laura Kelly, delineating the <i>Kansas Blueprint for Literacy</i> and including funding to be applied to state literacy and education workforce development. This comprehensive initiative establishes a literacy advisory committee, aligns teacher training and curricular materials with Structured Literacy, prohibits the use of discredited methodologies, develops a plan for six centers to be housed across the state for direct and indirect services, and sets teacher training and student performance goals for the state. The <i>Kansas Blueprint for Literacy</i> requires collaboration from various stakeholders, including educators, school systems, teacher trainers, literacy experts, parents, businesses, and policymakers, to systematically improve teacher training and student literacy instruction in the state. We review the history of recent literacy legislation in Kansas and describe the cyclical process through which practice has informed policy, which has informed practice. Finally, we will report on the state’s progress to date in achieving its goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"75 on","pages":"451 - 476"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145281299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1