Establishing thresholds for shock index in children to identify major trauma

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2024.111840
Sriram Ramgopal , Jillian K. Gorski , Pradip P. Chaudhari , Ryan G. Spurrier , Christopher M. Horvat , Michelle L. Macy , Rebecca E. Cash , Anne M. Stey , Christian Martin-Gill
{"title":"Establishing thresholds for shock index in children to identify major trauma","authors":"Sriram Ramgopal ,&nbsp;Jillian K. Gorski ,&nbsp;Pradip P. Chaudhari ,&nbsp;Ryan G. Spurrier ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Horvat ,&nbsp;Michelle L. Macy ,&nbsp;Rebecca E. Cash ,&nbsp;Anne M. Stey ,&nbsp;Christian Martin-Gill","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>An abnormal shock index (SI) is associated with greater injury severity among children with trauma. We sought to empirically-derive age-adjusted SI cutpoints associated with major trauma in children, and to compare the accuracy of these cutpoints to existing criteria for pediatric SI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort study using the 2021 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) Participant Use File. We included injured children (&lt;18 years), excluding patients with traumatic arrests, mechanical ventilation upon hospital presentation, and inter-facility transfers. Our outcome was major trauma defined by the standardized triage assessment tool (STAT) criteria. Our exposure of interest was the SI. We empirically-derived upper and lower cutpoints for the SI using age-adjusted Z-scores. We compared the performance of these to the SI, pediatric-adjusted (SIPA), and the Pediatric SI (PSI). We validated the performance of the cutpoints in the 2019 NTDB.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 64,326 and 64,316 children in the derivation and validation samples, of whom 4.9 % (derivation) and 4.0 % (validation) experienced major trauma. The empirically-derived age-adjusted SI cutpoints had a sensitivity of 43.2 % and a specificity of 79.4 % for major trauma in the validation sample. The sensitivity of the PSI for major trauma was 33.9 %, with a specificity of 90.7 % among children 1–17 years of age. The sensitivity of the SIPA was 37.4 %, with a specificity of 87.8 % among children 4–16 years of age. Evaluated using logistic regression, patients with an elevated age-adjusted SI had 3.97 greater odds (95 % confidence interval [CI] 3.63–4.33) of major trauma compared to those with a normal age-adjusted SI. Patients with a depressed SI had 1.55 greater odds (95 % CI 1.36–1.78) of major trauma. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for the empirically-derived model (0.62, 95 % CI 0.61–0.63) was similar to the AUROC for PSI (0.62, 95 % CI 0.61–0.63); both of which were greater than the SIPA model (0.58, 95 % CI 0.57–0.59).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Age-adjusted SI cutpoints demonstrated a mild gain in sensitivity compared to existing measures. However, our findings suggest that the SI alone has a limited role in the identification of major trauma in children.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 1","pages":"Article 111840"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324005692","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

An abnormal shock index (SI) is associated with greater injury severity among children with trauma. We sought to empirically-derive age-adjusted SI cutpoints associated with major trauma in children, and to compare the accuracy of these cutpoints to existing criteria for pediatric SI.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study using the 2021 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) Participant Use File. We included injured children (<18 years), excluding patients with traumatic arrests, mechanical ventilation upon hospital presentation, and inter-facility transfers. Our outcome was major trauma defined by the standardized triage assessment tool (STAT) criteria. Our exposure of interest was the SI. We empirically-derived upper and lower cutpoints for the SI using age-adjusted Z-scores. We compared the performance of these to the SI, pediatric-adjusted (SIPA), and the Pediatric SI (PSI). We validated the performance of the cutpoints in the 2019 NTDB.

Results

We included 64,326 and 64,316 children in the derivation and validation samples, of whom 4.9 % (derivation) and 4.0 % (validation) experienced major trauma. The empirically-derived age-adjusted SI cutpoints had a sensitivity of 43.2 % and a specificity of 79.4 % for major trauma in the validation sample. The sensitivity of the PSI for major trauma was 33.9 %, with a specificity of 90.7 % among children 1–17 years of age. The sensitivity of the SIPA was 37.4 %, with a specificity of 87.8 % among children 4–16 years of age. Evaluated using logistic regression, patients with an elevated age-adjusted SI had 3.97 greater odds (95 % confidence interval [CI] 3.63–4.33) of major trauma compared to those with a normal age-adjusted SI. Patients with a depressed SI had 1.55 greater odds (95 % CI 1.36–1.78) of major trauma. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for the empirically-derived model (0.62, 95 % CI 0.61–0.63) was similar to the AUROC for PSI (0.62, 95 % CI 0.61–0.63); both of which were greater than the SIPA model (0.58, 95 % CI 0.57–0.59).

Conclusion

Age-adjusted SI cutpoints demonstrated a mild gain in sensitivity compared to existing measures. However, our findings suggest that the SI alone has a limited role in the identification of major trauma in children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定儿童休克指数阈值,以识别重大创伤。
背景:休克指数(SI)异常与儿童外伤的严重程度有关。我们试图根据经验得出与儿童重大创伤相关的年龄调整后 SI 切点,并将这些切点的准确性与现有的儿科 SI 标准进行比较:我们使用 2021 年国家创伤数据库(NTDB)参与者使用文件进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了受伤儿童(结果:64,326 名受伤儿童和 64 名受伤儿童):我们在推导样本和验证样本中分别纳入了 64,326 名和 64,316 名儿童,其中 4.9%(推导样本)和 4.0%(验证样本)经历过重大创伤。在验证样本中,根据经验得出的年龄调整后 SI 切点对重大创伤的灵敏度为 43.2%,特异度为 79.4%。在 1-17 岁儿童中,PSI 对重大创伤的敏感性为 33.9%,特异性为 90.7%。在 4-16 岁儿童中,SIPA 的灵敏度为 37.4%,特异性为 87.8%。使用逻辑回归进行评估,与年龄调整后 SI 正常的患者相比,年龄调整后 SI 升高的患者发生重大创伤的几率要高出 3.97(95 % 置信区间 [CI] 3.63-4.33)。SI 低于正常值的患者发生重大创伤的几率为 1.55(95 % 置信区间为 1.36-1.78)。经验模型的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(0.62,95 % CI 0.61-0.63)与 PSI 的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(0.62,95 % CI 0.61-0.63)相似,均大于 SIPA 模型(0.58,95 % CI 0.57-0.59):结论:与现有的测量方法相比,年龄调整后的 SI 切点显示出轻微的灵敏度增加。然而,我们的研究结果表明,仅用 SI 来识别儿童重大创伤的作用是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Matched comparative study of 3D printed microporous tantalum prosthesis versus autologous bone graft in the final stage of Masquelet induced membrane surgery Mechanical and clinical performance of acellular allogeneic dermis combined with autologous split-thickness skin grafts for ankle soft tissue defect repair Advanced trauma life support 2025: A brief review of updates Editorial Board The road injury chain of survival: A framework for improving trauma outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1