Comment on: Willingness to take less medication for type 2 diabetes among older patients

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19175
Petra Denig PhD, Peter J. C. Stuijt MSc
{"title":"Comment on: Willingness to take less medication for type 2 diabetes among older patients","authors":"Petra Denig PhD,&nbsp;Peter J. C. Stuijt MSc","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When people with type 2 diabetes age and their health status deteriorates, reevaluation of their treatment is needed. Medication de-intensification is recommended for older patients with a poor health status when they have low levels of hemoglobin A1c while taking medication. The recently published study of Haider et al. investigated the willingness of older people with diabetes to de-intensify their medication.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Of particular interest, they examined which patient characteristics were associated with such willingness and whether this aligned with the guideline recommendations. A key finding was that the people who may benefit the most from treatment de-intensification according to the guidelines were less likely to be willing to take less diabetes medication.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>As Pilla et al. mentioned in an editorial, the study was limited by its reliance on responses to the question “I would be willing to take less medication for my diabetes” that lacks clinical context.<span><sup>2</sup></span> An alternative question has been posed by Crutzen et al. in a study among older people on diabetes and/or cardiovascular drugs.<span><sup>3</sup></span> This concerns the question from revised Patients Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire, “If my doctor said it was possible, I would be willing to stop one or more of my regular medicines.”<span><sup>4</sup></span> Crutzen et al. observed that 88% of older patients were willing to stop medication if their doctor said it was possible. This is clearly higher than the 51% willing to take less medication in the study of Haider et al. Although this could indicate that the willingness was higher given the context “that the doctor said it was possible,” an alternative explanation is that the willingness depends on the type of medication. Where the question posed by Haider et al. referred to “less medication for my diabetes,” the medication is not specified in the willingness question of the rPATD.</p><p>Differences regarding attitudes toward specific medication were further explored by Crutzen et al.<span><sup>3</sup></span> In particular, attitudes towards de-intensifying insulin, sulfonylurea, or statins were studied, showing remarkable differences. For example, few of the older people would like their doctor to reduce the dose of their insulin and more than half were reluctant to stop insulin (Table 1). For patients taking sulfonylurea or statins, these percentages were more in favor of de-intensification (Table 1). Furthermore, few people would like to try stopping the insulin or sulfonylurea they were taking to see how they would feel without, whereas more patients would like to try stopping their statin (Table 1). This might be related to experiencing drug-related problems, such as side effects. Very few patients believed they experienced side effects from their insulin or sulfonylurea, but this was clearly different for statins (Table 1). The finding that the willingness of diabetes patients to de-intensify medication depends on the type of medication is not surprising, be beliefs about necessity and concerns also differ for different cardiometabolic drugs.<span><sup>5</sup></span></p><p>There are more nuances regarding the question posed that are relevant for patients. De-intensification may include stopping medication as well as reducing treatment intensity. In the study of Haider et al., it is unclear how respondents interpreted “willing to take less medication.” Some might think this implies stopping medication, whereas others may have perceived this as including also dose reductions. Crutzen et al. showed that the majority of the older patients were unsure about wanting to reduce the dose of one or more of their medicines.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>Both Pilla et al. and Haider et al. acknowledge the importance of qualitative studies to provide insight into beliefs and views of people willing or unwilling to de-intensify diabetes medication.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> Relevant findings from previous studies include, for example, that some patients have unrealistic expectations of the benefits of diabetes medication and some become confused about changing treatment goals.<span><sup>6, 7</sup></span> Such misconceptions and misunderstandings can be addressed in patient-provider communication. Shared decision-making about medication de-intensification must include a patient-provider conversation about treatment goals and the benefits and risks of continuing a strict treatment regimen.<span><sup>1</sup></span> In addition, it should include questions about a patient's medication-specific expectations and experiences, to be taken into account when creating the treatment plan. Furthermore, previous studies identified conditions under which people would be more willing to de-intensify. In particular, close monitoring of clinical outcomes and having the option to restart are relevant for patients with diabetes.<span><sup>6, 7</sup></span> Finally, healthcare providers may need more training to conduct deprescribing consultations and apply deprescribing principles. Recent studies showed that such training can result in more frequent de-intensification of diabetes medication.<span><sup>8, 9</sup></span></p><p>PD wrote the original draft and PS conducted review and editing.</p><p>No funding sources.</p><p>The authors report no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"72 11","pages":"3607-3608"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19175","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When people with type 2 diabetes age and their health status deteriorates, reevaluation of their treatment is needed. Medication de-intensification is recommended for older patients with a poor health status when they have low levels of hemoglobin A1c while taking medication. The recently published study of Haider et al. investigated the willingness of older people with diabetes to de-intensify their medication.1 Of particular interest, they examined which patient characteristics were associated with such willingness and whether this aligned with the guideline recommendations. A key finding was that the people who may benefit the most from treatment de-intensification according to the guidelines were less likely to be willing to take less diabetes medication.1

As Pilla et al. mentioned in an editorial, the study was limited by its reliance on responses to the question “I would be willing to take less medication for my diabetes” that lacks clinical context.2 An alternative question has been posed by Crutzen et al. in a study among older people on diabetes and/or cardiovascular drugs.3 This concerns the question from revised Patients Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire, “If my doctor said it was possible, I would be willing to stop one or more of my regular medicines.”4 Crutzen et al. observed that 88% of older patients were willing to stop medication if their doctor said it was possible. This is clearly higher than the 51% willing to take less medication in the study of Haider et al. Although this could indicate that the willingness was higher given the context “that the doctor said it was possible,” an alternative explanation is that the willingness depends on the type of medication. Where the question posed by Haider et al. referred to “less medication for my diabetes,” the medication is not specified in the willingness question of the rPATD.

Differences regarding attitudes toward specific medication were further explored by Crutzen et al.3 In particular, attitudes towards de-intensifying insulin, sulfonylurea, or statins were studied, showing remarkable differences. For example, few of the older people would like their doctor to reduce the dose of their insulin and more than half were reluctant to stop insulin (Table 1). For patients taking sulfonylurea or statins, these percentages were more in favor of de-intensification (Table 1). Furthermore, few people would like to try stopping the insulin or sulfonylurea they were taking to see how they would feel without, whereas more patients would like to try stopping their statin (Table 1). This might be related to experiencing drug-related problems, such as side effects. Very few patients believed they experienced side effects from their insulin or sulfonylurea, but this was clearly different for statins (Table 1). The finding that the willingness of diabetes patients to de-intensify medication depends on the type of medication is not surprising, be beliefs about necessity and concerns also differ for different cardiometabolic drugs.5

There are more nuances regarding the question posed that are relevant for patients. De-intensification may include stopping medication as well as reducing treatment intensity. In the study of Haider et al., it is unclear how respondents interpreted “willing to take less medication.” Some might think this implies stopping medication, whereas others may have perceived this as including also dose reductions. Crutzen et al. showed that the majority of the older patients were unsure about wanting to reduce the dose of one or more of their medicines.3

Both Pilla et al. and Haider et al. acknowledge the importance of qualitative studies to provide insight into beliefs and views of people willing or unwilling to de-intensify diabetes medication.1, 2 Relevant findings from previous studies include, for example, that some patients have unrealistic expectations of the benefits of diabetes medication and some become confused about changing treatment goals.6, 7 Such misconceptions and misunderstandings can be addressed in patient-provider communication. Shared decision-making about medication de-intensification must include a patient-provider conversation about treatment goals and the benefits and risks of continuing a strict treatment regimen.1 In addition, it should include questions about a patient's medication-specific expectations and experiences, to be taken into account when creating the treatment plan. Furthermore, previous studies identified conditions under which people would be more willing to de-intensify. In particular, close monitoring of clinical outcomes and having the option to restart are relevant for patients with diabetes.6, 7 Finally, healthcare providers may need more training to conduct deprescribing consultations and apply deprescribing principles. Recent studies showed that such training can result in more frequent de-intensification of diabetes medication.8, 9

PD wrote the original draft and PS conducted review and editing.

No funding sources.

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发表评论:老年 2 型糖尿病患者减少用药的意愿。
当 2 型糖尿病患者年龄增长、健康状况恶化时,需要重新评估他们的治疗。对于健康状况较差的老年患者,如果他们在服药期间血红蛋白 A1c 水平较低,则建议减低用药强度。海德尔(Haider)等人最近发表的研究报告调查了老年糖尿病患者是否愿意减低用药强度。1 特别值得关注的是,他们研究了哪些患者特征与减低用药强度的意愿有关,以及这是否与指南建议一致。1 正如皮拉等人在一篇社论中提到的,这项研究的局限性在于它依赖于对 "我愿意减少糖尿病药物用量 "这一问题的回答,而这一问题缺乏临床背景。Crutzen 等人在一项针对服用糖尿病和/或心血管药物的老年人的研究中提出了另一个问题。3 该问题涉及经修订的《患者对减药的态度》(rPATD)问卷中的问题:"如果医生说有可能,我愿意停用一种或多种常规药物"。虽然这可能表明,在 "医生说可以 "的情况下,患者的意愿更高,但另一种解释是,患者的意愿取决于药物的种类。在 Haider 等人提出的问题中提到 "减少糖尿病药物治疗",而 rPATD 的意愿问题中并没有具体说明药物。例如,很少有老年人希望医生减少胰岛素的剂量,一半以上的老年人不愿意停用胰岛素(表 1)。而服用磺脲类药物或他汀类药物的患者则更倾向于减少剂量(表 1)。此外,很少有人愿意尝试停用正在服用的胰岛素或磺脲类药物,以了解停药后的感觉,而更多患者愿意尝试停用他汀类药物(表 1)。这可能与遇到药物相关问题(如副作用)有关。只有极少数患者认为胰岛素或磺脲类药物会给他们带来副作用,但他汀类药物显然不同(表 1)。糖尿病患者是否愿意减低用药强度取决于药物的种类,这一发现并不令人惊讶,因为不同的心血管代谢药物在必要性和顾虑方面也存在差异。降低强度可能包括停药和降低治疗强度。在 Haider 等人的研究中,并不清楚受访者如何理解 "愿意减少服药"。有些人可能认为这意味着停止用药,而另一些人可能认为这也包括减少用药剂量。Crutzen 等人的研究表明,大多数老年患者不确定是否愿意减少一种或多种药物的剂量。3 Pilla 等人和 Haider 等人都承认,定性研究对于深入了解愿意或不愿意减少糖尿病药物治疗的人的信念和观点非常重要、2 以往研究的相关发现包括,一些患者对糖尿病药物治疗的益处抱有不切实际的期望,一些患者对改变治疗目标感到困惑。关于药物减量的共同决策必须包括患者与医护人员关于治疗目标以及继续严格治疗方案的益处和风险的对话。此外,以往的研究还发现了在哪些条件下患者更愿意放弃强化治疗。6, 7 最后,医疗服务提供者可能需要接受更多培训,以进行去势咨询和应用去势原则。最近的研究表明,这种培训可以使糖尿病患者更频繁地停药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
Notices Issue Information Cover Issue Information Author Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1