Healthcare personnel acceptance and recommendations for influenza vaccine in twelve low- and middle-income countries: A pooled analysis from 2018 to 2020

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Vaccine Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.095
{"title":"Healthcare personnel acceptance and recommendations for influenza vaccine in twelve low- and middle-income countries: A pooled analysis from 2018 to 2020","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although healthcare personnel (HCP) are targeted for influenza vaccination they typically underutilize vaccines especially in low- and middle-income countries. We explored knowledge, attitudes, and practices of HCP about seasonal influenza vaccines (SIV) to identify factors associated with and modifiable barriers to SIV uptake.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We pooled individual-level data from cross-sectional surveys about SIV conducted among health workers in 12 low- and middle- income countries during 2018–2020 (i.e., Albania, Armenia, Cote d’Ivoire, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lao PDR, Lebanon, Morocco, North Macedonia, Tunisia, Tajikistan, and Uganda). Eleven countries used a standard protocol and questionnaire based on the Health Belief Model to measure perceptions of susceptibility and severity of influenza disease, benefits of, barriers to, and motivators for vaccination. We analyzed attitudes and perceptions among HCP, including acceptance of vaccine for themselves and willingness to recommend vaccines to patients, grouped by the presence/absence of a national influenza vaccination program. Models were adjusted for geographic region.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our analysis included 10,281 HCP from 12 countries representing four of the six World Health Organization regions: African, Eastern Mediterranean, European, and Western Pacific. The sample was distributed across low income (LIC) (3,183, 31 %), lower-middle (LMIC) (4,744, 46 %), and upper-middle income (UMIC) (2,354, 23 %) countries. Half (50 %) of the countries included in the analysis reported SIV use among HCP in both the year of and the year preceding data collection while the remainder had no influenza vaccination program for HCP. Seventy-four percent (6,341) of HCP reported that they would be willing to be vaccinated if the vaccine was provided free of charge. HCP in LICs were willing to pay prices for SIV representing a higher percentage of their country’s annual health expenditure per capita (6.26 % [interquartile range, IQR: 3.13–12.52]) compared to HCP in LMICs and UMICs. HCP in countries with no SIV program were also willing to pay a higher percentage for SIV (5.01 % [IQR: 2.24–8.34]) compared to HCP in countries with SIV programs.. Most (85 %) HCP in our analysis would recommend vaccines to their patients, and those who would accept vaccines for themselves were 3 times more likely to recommend vaccines to their patients (OR 3.1 [95 % CI 1·8, 5·2]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Increasing uptake of SIV among HCP can amplify positive impacts of vaccination by increasing the likelihood that HCP recommend vaccines to their patients. Successful strategies to achieve increased uptake of vaccines include clear guidance from health authorities, interventions based on behavior change models, and access to vaccine free-of-charge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although healthcare personnel (HCP) are targeted for influenza vaccination they typically underutilize vaccines especially in low- and middle-income countries. We explored knowledge, attitudes, and practices of HCP about seasonal influenza vaccines (SIV) to identify factors associated with and modifiable barriers to SIV uptake.

Methods

We pooled individual-level data from cross-sectional surveys about SIV conducted among health workers in 12 low- and middle- income countries during 2018–2020 (i.e., Albania, Armenia, Cote d’Ivoire, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lao PDR, Lebanon, Morocco, North Macedonia, Tunisia, Tajikistan, and Uganda). Eleven countries used a standard protocol and questionnaire based on the Health Belief Model to measure perceptions of susceptibility and severity of influenza disease, benefits of, barriers to, and motivators for vaccination. We analyzed attitudes and perceptions among HCP, including acceptance of vaccine for themselves and willingness to recommend vaccines to patients, grouped by the presence/absence of a national influenza vaccination program. Models were adjusted for geographic region.

Results

Our analysis included 10,281 HCP from 12 countries representing four of the six World Health Organization regions: African, Eastern Mediterranean, European, and Western Pacific. The sample was distributed across low income (LIC) (3,183, 31 %), lower-middle (LMIC) (4,744, 46 %), and upper-middle income (UMIC) (2,354, 23 %) countries. Half (50 %) of the countries included in the analysis reported SIV use among HCP in both the year of and the year preceding data collection while the remainder had no influenza vaccination program for HCP. Seventy-four percent (6,341) of HCP reported that they would be willing to be vaccinated if the vaccine was provided free of charge. HCP in LICs were willing to pay prices for SIV representing a higher percentage of their country’s annual health expenditure per capita (6.26 % [interquartile range, IQR: 3.13–12.52]) compared to HCP in LMICs and UMICs. HCP in countries with no SIV program were also willing to pay a higher percentage for SIV (5.01 % [IQR: 2.24–8.34]) compared to HCP in countries with SIV programs.. Most (85 %) HCP in our analysis would recommend vaccines to their patients, and those who would accept vaccines for themselves were 3 times more likely to recommend vaccines to their patients (OR 3.1 [95 % CI 1·8, 5·2]).

Conclusion

Increasing uptake of SIV among HCP can amplify positive impacts of vaccination by increasing the likelihood that HCP recommend vaccines to their patients. Successful strategies to achieve increased uptake of vaccines include clear guidance from health authorities, interventions based on behavior change models, and access to vaccine free-of-charge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
十二个中低收入国家医护人员对流感疫苗的接受程度和建议:2018年至2020年的汇总分析。
背景:尽管医护人员(HCP)是流感疫苗接种的目标人群,但他们对疫苗的利用率通常很低,尤其是在中低收入国家。我们探讨了医护人员对季节性流感疫苗(SIV)的认识、态度和实践,以确定与 SIV 接种相关的因素和可改变的障碍:我们汇集了 2018-2020 年间在 12 个中低收入国家(即阿尔巴尼亚、亚美尼亚、科特迪瓦、肯尼亚、吉尔吉斯斯坦、老挝人民民主共和国、黎巴嫩、摩洛哥、北马其顿、突尼斯、塔吉克斯坦和乌干达)对卫生工作者进行的有关 SIV 的横断面调查的个人层面数据。11 个国家采用了基于健康信念模型的标准方案和调查问卷来衡量对流感疾病易感性和严重程度、接种疫苗的益处、障碍和动机的看法。我们分析了卫生保健人员的态度和看法,包括他们自己对疫苗的接受程度和向病人推荐疫苗的意愿,并按照是否存在国家流感疫苗接种计划进行了分组。根据地理区域对模型进行了调整:我们的分析包括世界卫生组织六个地区中四个地区的 12 个国家的 10,281 名 HCP:我们的分析包括来自 12 个国家的 10,281 名 HCP,分别代表世界卫生组织的六个地区中的四个地区:非洲、东地中海、欧洲和西太平洋。样本分布在低收入 (LIC) 国家(3183 人,占 31%)、中低收入 (LMIC) 国家(4744 人,占 46%)和中高收入 (UMIC) 国家(2354 人,占 23%)。在纳入分析的国家中,有一半(50%)的国家报告说,在数据收集当年和前一年,卫生保健人员中都有使用 SIV 的情况,而其余国家则没有为卫生保健人员制定流感疫苗接种计划。74%(6,341 人)的 HCP 表示,如果免费提供疫苗,他们愿意接种。与低收入和中等收入国家以及超低收入和中等收入国家的初级保健人员相比,低收入和中等收入国家的初级保健人员愿意支付的 SIV 疫苗费用占其国家年度人均医疗支出的比例较高(6.26% [四分位数间距,IQR:3.13-12.52])。与实施 SIV 计划的国家相比,未实施 SIV 计划的国家的保健医生也愿意为 SIV 支付更高的费用(5.01% [IQR: 2.24-8.34])。在我们的分析中,大多数(85%)初级保健医生会向他们的病人推荐疫苗,而那些愿意为自己接种疫苗的人向他们的病人推荐疫苗的可能性要高出三倍(OR 3.1 [95 % CI 1-8, 5-2]):结论:提高 HCP 对 SIV 的接种率可增加 HCP 向其患者推荐疫苗的可能性,从而扩大疫苗接种的积极影响。提高疫苗接种率的成功策略包括卫生当局的明确指导、基于行为改变模式的干预措施以及免费提供疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
期刊最新文献
Effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the risk of developing post-COVID conditions: The VENUS study Unraveling COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Europeans 50 and older through a lens of preventive practices Corrigendum to “Evaluation of commercial quadrivalent foot-and-mouth disease vaccines against east African virus strains reveals limited immunogenicity and duration of protection” [Vaccine 42 (1–12) (2024) 126325] Cost effectiveness analysis of rotavirus vaccination in Indonesia Parental decisions regarding the vaccination of children and adolescents against SARS-CoV-2 from 2020 to 2023: A descriptive longitudinal study of parents and children in Montreal, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1