A robust ensemble of hybrid and bivariate statistical models for flood prediction mapping in Lower Damodar River Basin of India

Shuayb Abdinour Osman , Jayanta Das
{"title":"A robust ensemble of hybrid and bivariate statistical models for flood prediction mapping in Lower Damodar River Basin of India","authors":"Shuayb Abdinour Osman ,&nbsp;Jayanta Das","doi":"10.1016/j.geogeo.2024.100312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research explores flood prediction in the Lower Damodar River Basin (LDRB) using a hybrid ensemble of a Naïve Bayes Tree (NBT) and five bivariate statistical models such as Evidential Belief Function (EBF), Index of Entropy (IOE), Frequency Ratio (FR), Statistical Index (SI), and Modified Information Value (MIV). A total of 348 flood locations and 15 conditioning factors including hydrological, topographical and land cover were considered for this analysis. To ensure the precision of model predictions, a multicollinearity assessment was executed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under curve (AUC), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) were performed to compare and asses each of the models all. The results reveal that all models performed well in creating flood hazard maps with AUC &gt;0.8 and RMSE &lt;0.4. FR and EBF models demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy (AUC=0.85), followed by the IOE, SI, and MIV models. The ensemble of NBT with bivariate models shows promising results, showcasing reduced error metrics and improved accuracy for the IOE, SI, and MIV models. This study highlights the potential of ensemble models in flood hazard prediction, offering valuable insights for global flood risk management. The successful application of these data-driven models showcases their importance in forecasting flood risks, aiding decision-makers and planners in developing more effective flood mitigation strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100582,"journal":{"name":"Geosystems and Geoenvironment","volume":"3 4","pages":"Article 100312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772883824000621/pdfft?md5=c5d1c08f3c4d9022ddbf80e95b6d5637&pid=1-s2.0-S2772883824000621-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosystems and Geoenvironment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772883824000621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research explores flood prediction in the Lower Damodar River Basin (LDRB) using a hybrid ensemble of a Naïve Bayes Tree (NBT) and five bivariate statistical models such as Evidential Belief Function (EBF), Index of Entropy (IOE), Frequency Ratio (FR), Statistical Index (SI), and Modified Information Value (MIV). A total of 348 flood locations and 15 conditioning factors including hydrological, topographical and land cover were considered for this analysis. To ensure the precision of model predictions, a multicollinearity assessment was executed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under curve (AUC), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) were performed to compare and asses each of the models all. The results reveal that all models performed well in creating flood hazard maps with AUC >0.8 and RMSE <0.4. FR and EBF models demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy (AUC=0.85), followed by the IOE, SI, and MIV models. The ensemble of NBT with bivariate models shows promising results, showcasing reduced error metrics and improved accuracy for the IOE, SI, and MIV models. This study highlights the potential of ensemble models in flood hazard prediction, offering valuable insights for global flood risk management. The successful application of these data-driven models showcases their importance in forecasting flood risks, aiding decision-makers and planners in developing more effective flood mitigation strategies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于绘制印度达莫达河下游流域洪水预测图的强健混合和双变量统计模型组合
本研究使用奈伊夫贝叶斯树 (NBT) 和五个二元统计模型(如证据信念函数 (EBF)、熵指数 (IOE)、频率比 (FR)、统计指数 (SI) 和修正信息值 (MIV))的混合组合,对达摩达尔河下游流域 (LDRB) 的洪水预测进行了探讨。本次分析共考虑了 348 个洪水地点和 15 个条件因子,包括水文、地形和土地覆盖。为确保模型预测的精确性,进行了多重共线性评估。对所有模型进行了比较和评估,包括接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)、曲线下面积(AUC)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、平均平方误差(MSE)和均方根误差(RMSE)。结果表明,所有模型在绘制洪水灾害地图时均表现良好,AUC 为 0.8,RMSE 为 0.4。FR 和 EBF 模型的预测精度最高(AUC=0.85),其次是 IOE、SI 和 MIV 模型。带有双变量模型的 NBT 集合显示出良好的结果,IOE、SI 和 MIV 模型的误差指标降低,准确性提高。这项研究凸显了集合模型在洪水灾害预测中的潜力,为全球洪水风险管理提供了宝贵的见解。这些数据驱动模型的成功应用展示了它们在洪水风险预测中的重要性,有助于决策者和规划者制定更有效的洪水缓解战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Olivine composition of calcite-carbonatite from Sevvattur carbonatite alkaline complex, Dharmapuri Rift Zone, Southern Granulite Terrain, India Composition of olivines and spinel group minerals in aillikites from the Bushkanay dyke, South Siberian Craton: Insights into alkaline melt sources and evolution Petrology of ijolite xenoliths entrained in a nephelinite dyke from the Kamthai area, Late Cretaceous polychronous Sarnu-Dandali alkaline complex, North-West India: Evidence for recurrent magmatic pulses and magma mixing Petrogenetic and geochemical constraints on ca. 1.89–1.88 Ga Bastanar mafic dyke swarm, Bastar craton, India: Insights into MORB- and OIB-type contributions and interactions with metasomatized subcontinental lithospheric mantle Nd isotope systematics of Late Paleozoic granitoids from the Western Transbaikalia (Russia): Petrological consequences and plume model testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1