Boosting co-creation of Nature‐based Solutions within Living Labs: Interrelating enablers using Interpretive Structural Modelling

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103873
{"title":"Boosting co-creation of Nature‐based Solutions within Living Labs: Interrelating enablers using Interpretive Structural Modelling","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Co-creation is at the intersection of Nature-based Solutions and Living Lab concepts, which adopt collaboration and innovation amongst different stakeholders to address complex issues such as climate change. Nature-based Solutions have been increasingly recognized for their potential to address diverse societal challenges in a multifunctional, action-oriented, and contextualized manner. Living Labs have proliferated as a participatory approach for the co-development and co-testing of Nature-based Solutions, particularly in Europe. Nevertheless, there is a persistent challenge regarding enhancing stakeholder engagement, which is recognized as crucial for the implementation of Nature-based Solutions. In this article, we examined ten empirical cases of Living Labs applying Nature-based Solutions to increase climate resilience in European coastal cities. We conducted an Interpretive Structural Modelling and Cross-impact Matrix Multiplication Applied to Classification analysis methodology to systematically analyse and interrelate co-creation enablers. We have identified fifteen enablers to co-create Nature-based Solutions in Living Labs across five levels of influence among each other. A key finding is that ‘sharing and learning from real-life examples’ and ‘opening opportunities for informal inputs’ have the most driving power among the studied enablers. Having a robust engagement toolbox also appears to be a crucial point in enhancing co-creation. Exploring the potential of such enablers seems vital to fostering the co-creation of Nature-based Solutions within Living Labs. By understanding how enablers are interlinked and can be prioritized based on their driving and dependence powers, environmental managers can better use their resources and engage with their key stakeholders more successfully.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002077/pdfft?md5=cb5acbba7d1a72bfc27659df12d1eb4e&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124002077-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-creation is at the intersection of Nature-based Solutions and Living Lab concepts, which adopt collaboration and innovation amongst different stakeholders to address complex issues such as climate change. Nature-based Solutions have been increasingly recognized for their potential to address diverse societal challenges in a multifunctional, action-oriented, and contextualized manner. Living Labs have proliferated as a participatory approach for the co-development and co-testing of Nature-based Solutions, particularly in Europe. Nevertheless, there is a persistent challenge regarding enhancing stakeholder engagement, which is recognized as crucial for the implementation of Nature-based Solutions. In this article, we examined ten empirical cases of Living Labs applying Nature-based Solutions to increase climate resilience in European coastal cities. We conducted an Interpretive Structural Modelling and Cross-impact Matrix Multiplication Applied to Classification analysis methodology to systematically analyse and interrelate co-creation enablers. We have identified fifteen enablers to co-create Nature-based Solutions in Living Labs across five levels of influence among each other. A key finding is that ‘sharing and learning from real-life examples’ and ‘opening opportunities for informal inputs’ have the most driving power among the studied enablers. Having a robust engagement toolbox also appears to be a crucial point in enhancing co-creation. Exploring the potential of such enablers seems vital to fostering the co-creation of Nature-based Solutions within Living Labs. By understanding how enablers are interlinked and can be prioritized based on their driving and dependence powers, environmental managers can better use their resources and engage with their key stakeholders more successfully.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 "生活实验室 "内促进共同创造基于自然的解决方案:利用解释性结构模型建立相互关联的推动因素
共同创造是 "基于自然的解决方案 "和 "生活实验室 "概念的交叉点,这两个概念通过不同利益相关方之间的合作和创新来解决气候变化等复杂问题。基于自然的解决方案以多功能、以行动为导向和因地制宜的方式应对各种社会挑战的潜力日益得到认可。作为共同开发和共同测试基于自然的解决方案的一种参与式方法,"生活实验室"(Living Labs)如雨后春笋般涌现,尤其是在欧洲。然而,在加强利益相关者的参与方面一直存在挑战,而利益相关者的参与被认为是实施基于自然的解决方案的关键。在这篇文章中,我们研究了生活实验室应用基于自然的解决方案提高欧洲沿海城市气候适应能力的十个经验案例。我们采用解释性结构建模和交叉影响矩阵乘法应用于分类分析的方法,对共同创造的促进因素进行了系统分析和相互关联。我们确定了在生活实验室中共同创造基于自然的解决方案的 15 个促进因素,它们之间存在五个层次的相互影响。一个重要发现是,在所研究的促进因素中,"分享和学习真实案例 "和 "为非正式投入创造机会 "最具推动力。拥有一个强大的参与工具箱似乎也是促进共同创造的一个关键点。探索这些促进因素的潜力对于在生活实验室内促进基于自然的解决方案的共同创造似乎至关重要。通过了解各种促进因素之间的相互联系,并根据其驱动力和依赖力确定优先次序,环境管理者可以更好地利用资源,并更成功地与主要利益相关者合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Attending to the unattended: Why and how do local governments plan for access and functional needs in climate risk reduction? Beyond Academia: A case for reviews of gray literature for science-policy processes and applied research Of heroes and villains – How coalitions shape their narratives and what the public conservation debate is actually about? Enhancing meaningful Indigenous leadership and collaboration in international environmental governance forums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1