Evaluating clean electricity transition progress across UK political pledges and G7 countries

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2024.101510
Nathan Johnson , Alistair McGirr , Luke Hatton , Olusola Bamisile , Alanna Rose Rooney , Iain Staffell
{"title":"Evaluating clean electricity transition progress across UK political pledges and G7 countries","authors":"Nathan Johnson ,&nbsp;Alistair McGirr ,&nbsp;Luke Hatton ,&nbsp;Olusola Bamisile ,&nbsp;Alanna Rose Rooney ,&nbsp;Iain Staffell","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The transition towards clean electricity is central to global decarbonisation. Countless metrics are used to assess national electricity transition efforts, which hinders understanding and comparison between nations or political party pledges. This study instead proposes three simple metrics: clean generation share, gross, and net carbon emissions intensity. It uses them to provide the first evaluation of the 2024 Clean Energy Mission (CEM) proposed by the UK's newly-elected Labour Government, which has strengthened ambition for wind and solar power capacity. We compare the CEM to previous political pledges, finding it could reduce national electricity generation emissions by 17 MtCO<sub>2</sub> in 2030, equivalent to a two percentage point increase in the UK's 2030 Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC). We also use these metrics to compare past efforts and future pledges across the G7 countries, finding that the CEM progresses the UK from having the lowest share of clean electricity in 2010 to the highest by 2030. The UK must increase its pace of clean electricity uptake and decarbonisation by a factor of 1.5–2 to meet its 2030 targets; compared to a factor 4–6 acceleration required by Germany and the US. The paper provides an innovative, simple and replicable framework for assessing the impact of political pledges or national targets for the power sector, and for comparing efforts to decarbonise electricity between countries and over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101510"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002190/pdfft?md5=a14e48d8e9c448ed879a0049e0a26735&pid=1-s2.0-S2211467X24002190-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transition towards clean electricity is central to global decarbonisation. Countless metrics are used to assess national electricity transition efforts, which hinders understanding and comparison between nations or political party pledges. This study instead proposes three simple metrics: clean generation share, gross, and net carbon emissions intensity. It uses them to provide the first evaluation of the 2024 Clean Energy Mission (CEM) proposed by the UK's newly-elected Labour Government, which has strengthened ambition for wind and solar power capacity. We compare the CEM to previous political pledges, finding it could reduce national electricity generation emissions by 17 MtCO2 in 2030, equivalent to a two percentage point increase in the UK's 2030 Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC). We also use these metrics to compare past efforts and future pledges across the G7 countries, finding that the CEM progresses the UK from having the lowest share of clean electricity in 2010 to the highest by 2030. The UK must increase its pace of clean electricity uptake and decarbonisation by a factor of 1.5–2 to meet its 2030 targets; compared to a factor 4–6 acceleration required by Germany and the US. The paper provides an innovative, simple and replicable framework for assessing the impact of political pledges or national targets for the power sector, and for comparing efforts to decarbonise electricity between countries and over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估英国政治承诺和七国集团国家在清洁电力转型方面取得的进展
向清洁电力过渡是全球去碳化的核心。评估各国电力转型努力的指标不计其数,这阻碍了对各国或各政党承诺的理解和比较。本研究提出了三个简单的指标:清洁发电份额、碳排放强度总值和净值。本研究利用这些指标对英国新当选的工党政府提出的 2024 年清洁能源任务(CEM)进行了首次评估,该任务加强了对风能和太阳能发电能力的追求。我们将 CEM 与之前的政治承诺进行了比较,发现它可以在 2030 年将全国发电排放量减少 17 兆吨 CO2,相当于英国 2030 年全国确定贡献 (NDC) 增加了两个百分点。我们还利用这些指标对 G7 国家过去的努力和未来的承诺进行了比较,发现 CEM 使英国从 2010 年清洁电力比例最低的国家进步到 2030 年清洁电力比例最高的国家。要实现 2030 年的目标,英国必须将清洁电力的吸收和脱碳速度提高 1.5-2 倍;相比之下,德国和美国需要加快 4-6 倍。本文提供了一个创新、简单和可复制的框架,用于评估政治承诺或国家目标对电力行业的影响,以及比较不同国家和不同时期电力去碳化的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
期刊最新文献
Production and certification constraints to sustainable aviation fuel adoption: Analysis and synergistic solutions Energy security risk and private sector development: A pathway to renewable energy investment in emerging economies The impact of digital inclusive finance on Green low-carbon energy transition: Evidence from China Why current resilience metrics fall short in the energy transition: A system-level review of gaps and needs Public perceptions of low-dose radiation and small modular reactors: A survey-based social science analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1