The impact of deep learning image reconstruction of spectral CTU virtual non contrast images for patients with renal stones

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Open Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100599
Hong Zhu , Deyan Kong , Jiale Qian , Xiaomeng Shi , Jing Fan
{"title":"The impact of deep learning image reconstruction of spectral CTU virtual non contrast images for patients with renal stones","authors":"Hong Zhu ,&nbsp;Deyan Kong ,&nbsp;Jiale Qian ,&nbsp;Xiaomeng Shi ,&nbsp;Jing Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare image quality and detection accuracy of renal stones between deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) reconstructed virtual non-contrast (VNC) images and true non-contrast (TNC) images in spectral CT Urography (CTU).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on images of 70 patients who underwent abdominal-pelvic CTU in TNC phase using non-contrast scan and contrast-enhanced corticomedullary phase (CP) and excretory phase (EP) using spectral scan. The TNC scan was reconstructed using ASIR-V70 % (TNC-AR70), contrast-enhanced scans were reconstructed using AR70, DLIR medium-level (DM), and high-level (DH) to obtain CP-VNC-AR70/DM/DH and EP-VNC-AR70/DM/DH image groups, respectively. CT value, image quality and kidney stones quantification accuracy were measured and compared among groups. The subjective evaluation was independently assessed by two senior radiologists using the 5-point Likert scale for image quality and lesion visibility.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>DH images were superior to AR70 and DM images in objective image quality evaluation. There was no statistical difference in the liver and spleen (both P &gt; 0.05), or within 6HU in renal and fat in CT value between VNC and TNC images. EP-VNC-DH had the lowest image noise, highest SNR, and CNR, and VNC-AR70 images had better noise and SNR performance than TNC-AR70 images (all p &lt; 0.05). EP-VNC-DH had the highest subjective image quality, and CP-VNC-DH performed the best in lesion visibility. In stone CT value and volume measurements, there was no statistical difference between VNC and TNC (P &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The DLIR-reconstructed VNC images in CTU provide better image quality than the ASIR-V reconstructed TNC images and similar quantification accuracy for kidney stones for potential dose savings.</p><p>The study highlights that deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR)-reconstructed virtual non-contrast (VNC) images in spectral CT Urography (CTU) offer improved image quality compared to traditional true non-contrast (TNC) images, while maintaining similar accuracy in kidney stone detection, suggesting potential dose savings in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000546/pdfft?md5=26733059cc2a262840a0fc61adcdcfbb&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000546-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To compare image quality and detection accuracy of renal stones between deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) reconstructed virtual non-contrast (VNC) images and true non-contrast (TNC) images in spectral CT Urography (CTU).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on images of 70 patients who underwent abdominal-pelvic CTU in TNC phase using non-contrast scan and contrast-enhanced corticomedullary phase (CP) and excretory phase (EP) using spectral scan. The TNC scan was reconstructed using ASIR-V70 % (TNC-AR70), contrast-enhanced scans were reconstructed using AR70, DLIR medium-level (DM), and high-level (DH) to obtain CP-VNC-AR70/DM/DH and EP-VNC-AR70/DM/DH image groups, respectively. CT value, image quality and kidney stones quantification accuracy were measured and compared among groups. The subjective evaluation was independently assessed by two senior radiologists using the 5-point Likert scale for image quality and lesion visibility.

Results

DH images were superior to AR70 and DM images in objective image quality evaluation. There was no statistical difference in the liver and spleen (both P > 0.05), or within 6HU in renal and fat in CT value between VNC and TNC images. EP-VNC-DH had the lowest image noise, highest SNR, and CNR, and VNC-AR70 images had better noise and SNR performance than TNC-AR70 images (all p < 0.05). EP-VNC-DH had the highest subjective image quality, and CP-VNC-DH performed the best in lesion visibility. In stone CT value and volume measurements, there was no statistical difference between VNC and TNC (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The DLIR-reconstructed VNC images in CTU provide better image quality than the ASIR-V reconstructed TNC images and similar quantification accuracy for kidney stones for potential dose savings.

The study highlights that deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR)-reconstructed virtual non-contrast (VNC) images in spectral CT Urography (CTU) offer improved image quality compared to traditional true non-contrast (TNC) images, while maintaining similar accuracy in kidney stone detection, suggesting potential dose savings in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深度学习图像重建光谱 CTU 虚拟无对比图像对肾结石患者的影响
目的比较深度学习图像重建(DLIR)和自适应统计迭代重建-Veo(ASIR-V)重建的虚拟非对比度(VNC)图像和真实非对比度(TNC)图像在光谱 CT 尿路造影(CTU)中的图像质量和肾结石的检测准确性。方法对 70 名接受腹盆腔 CTU 的患者的图像进行了回顾性分析,这些患者在 TNC 阶段使用非对比扫描,在对比增强的皮质髓质阶段(CP)和排泄阶段(EP)使用光谱扫描。TNC扫描采用ASIR-V70%(TNC-AR70)重建,对比增强扫描采用AR70、DLIR中级(DM)和高级(DH)重建,分别获得CP-VNC-AR70/DM/DH和EP-VNC-AR70/DM/DH图像组。测量并比较各组的 CT 值、图像质量和肾结石定量准确性。主观评价由两名资深放射科医生使用 5 点 Likert 量表对图像质量和病变可见度进行独立评估。VNC 和 TNC 图像在肝脏和脾脏(P 均为 0.05)、6HU 以内的肾脏和脂肪 CT 值方面没有统计学差异。EP-VNC-DH 的图像噪声最低、信噪比和 CNR 最高,VNC-AR70 图像的噪声和信噪比表现优于 TNC-AR70 图像(均为 P <0.05)。EP-VNC-DH的主观图像质量最高,CP-VNC-DH的病灶可见度最好。结论 CTU 中 DLIR 重构的 VNC 图像比 ASIR-V 重构的 TNC 图像具有更好的图像质量和相似的肾结石量化准确性,可节省潜在的剂量。该研究强调,与传统的真实非对比(TNC)图像相比,深度学习图像重建(DLIR)重建的光谱 CT 尿路造影(CTU)虚拟非对比(VNC)图像可提高图像质量,同时保持相似的肾结石检测准确性,这表明在临床实践中有望节省剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Deep learning model for diagnosis of thyroid nodules with size less than 1 cm: A multicenter, retrospective study MRI-based radiomics machine learning model to differentiate non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma from benign renal tumors Post-deployment performance of a deep learning algorithm for normal and abnormal chest X-ray classification: A study at visa screening centers in the United Arab Emirates Study on the classification of benign and malignant breast lesions using a multi-sequence breast MRI fusion radiomics and deep learning model True cost estimation of common imaging procedures for cost-effectiveness analysis - insights from a Singapore hospital emergency department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1