Unleashing pre-service language teachers’ productivity with generative AI: Emotions, appraisal and coping strategies

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2024-08-25 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108417
Hongbiao Yin , Chan Wang , Zhijun Liu
{"title":"Unleashing pre-service language teachers’ productivity with generative AI: Emotions, appraisal and coping strategies","authors":"Hongbiao Yin ,&nbsp;Chan Wang ,&nbsp;Zhijun Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in language education has been widely recognized. However, there has been limited attention given to the emotional experiences of language teachers using AI and its relationship with AI-enabled productivity. By investigating 1,683 pre-service language teachers’ experiences of using generative AI in their teaching practicum or learning, this study explored how teachers’ emotional responses to AI use in teaching and learning are related to their AI-enabled productivity through the mediation of appraisal and coping. We uncovered several key findings: (1) achievement, challenge, and loss emotions were directly and/or indirectly related to AI-enabled productivity, while deterrence emotions were not; (2) achievement and challenge emotions were positively correlated with challenge appraisal and negatively correlated with hindrance appraisal, whereas loss and deterrence emotions showed the opposite pattern of correlation; (3) challenge emotions were positively related to approach-oriented coping, while loss and deterrence emotions were positively associated with avoidance-oriented coping; (4) among the coping strategies, only positive reinterpretation was positively associated with AI-enabled productivity; and (5) challenge appraisal and positive reinterpretation were significant mediators in the relationships between emotions and AI-enabled productivity, either separately or sequentially. These findings provide valuable insights for future research and practice, aiming to support the application of generative <span>AI</span> in the context of language education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 108417"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224002851","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in language education has been widely recognized. However, there has been limited attention given to the emotional experiences of language teachers using AI and its relationship with AI-enabled productivity. By investigating 1,683 pre-service language teachers’ experiences of using generative AI in their teaching practicum or learning, this study explored how teachers’ emotional responses to AI use in teaching and learning are related to their AI-enabled productivity through the mediation of appraisal and coping. We uncovered several key findings: (1) achievement, challenge, and loss emotions were directly and/or indirectly related to AI-enabled productivity, while deterrence emotions were not; (2) achievement and challenge emotions were positively correlated with challenge appraisal and negatively correlated with hindrance appraisal, whereas loss and deterrence emotions showed the opposite pattern of correlation; (3) challenge emotions were positively related to approach-oriented coping, while loss and deterrence emotions were positively associated with avoidance-oriented coping; (4) among the coping strategies, only positive reinterpretation was positively associated with AI-enabled productivity; and (5) challenge appraisal and positive reinterpretation were significant mediators in the relationships between emotions and AI-enabled productivity, either separately or sequentially. These findings provide valuable insights for future research and practice, aiming to support the application of generative AI in the context of language education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用生成式人工智能释放职前语文教师的生产力:情感、评价和应对策略
生成式人工智能(AI)在语言教育中的潜力已得到广泛认可。然而,人们对语文教师使用人工智能的情感体验及其与人工智能所带来的生产力之间的关系关注有限。本研究通过调查 1683 名职前语言教师在教学实习或学习中使用生成式人工智能的经历,探讨了教师在教学中使用人工智能的情绪反应如何通过评估和应对的中介作用与人工智能提高的工作效率之间的关系。我们发现了几个重要的发现:(1) 成就感、挑战感和失落感与人工智能的生产力直接和/或间接相关,而威慑感则不然;(2) 成就感和挑战感与挑战评价正相关,与阻碍评价负相关,而失落感和威慑感则呈现相反的相关模式;(3) 挑战情绪与以接近为导向的应对方式呈正相关,而损失和威慑情绪与以回避为导向的应对方式呈正相关;(4) 在各种应对策略中,只有积极的重新解释与人工智能提高生产率呈正相关;(5) 挑战评价和积极的重新解释是情绪与人工智能提高生产率之间关系的重要中介,无论是单独还是依次进行。这些发现为未来的研究和实践提供了宝贵的见解,旨在支持生成式人工智能在语言教育中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
What makes an app authentic? Determining antecedents of perceived authenticity in an AI-powered service app The effects of self-explanation on game-based learning: Evidence from eye-tracking analyses Avatars at risk: Exploring public response to sexual violence in immersive digital spaces Perception of non-binary social media users towards authentic non-binary social media influencers Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1