Understanding residents’ choice of urban farming systems in the Kumasi metropolis of Ghana: Land use policy implications

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Land Use Policy Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107330
Faizal Adams , Ayat Ullah , Jonathan Quaye , Amos Mensah
{"title":"Understanding residents’ choice of urban farming systems in the Kumasi metropolis of Ghana: Land use policy implications","authors":"Faizal Adams ,&nbsp;Ayat Ullah ,&nbsp;Jonathan Quaye ,&nbsp;Amos Mensah","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The heightened food insecurity in urban settings has rekindled the debate over the promotion of urban agriculture (UA) as a sustainable alternative food supply source across the globe. This study, therefore, examines the determinants of urban residents’ decisions to engage in UA and their choice of agriculture practices. Cross-sectional data was solicited from 430 urban dwellers through a multi-stage sampling technique. The data was analysed using descriptive as well as binary and multinomial logit regression models. The descriptive analysis shows that the cultivation of crops (34.7 %) predominates urban agricultural practices before crop-livestock integration (32.6 %) and livestock farming (32.6 %). The study identifies gender, age, religious affiliation, years of formal education, location of residence, household size, food insecurity status, availability of vacant land, extension access, and household income as significant determinants of urban households’ decision to participate in UA. The multinomial logit regression analysis revealed that urban farmers’ decision to practice only crop production is invariant between livestock-only production and integrated crop-livestock systems. When compared to the base category of the integrated crop-livestock system, the findings indicate that farmers’ educational background, food insecurity, engagement in salaried jobs, location, extension, and credit access are the main drivers of the decision to practice either crop-only or sole livestock production systems. The findings of this study have useful implications for the formulation of UA programs based on the different farming systems practiced in the study location.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 107330"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837724002837","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The heightened food insecurity in urban settings has rekindled the debate over the promotion of urban agriculture (UA) as a sustainable alternative food supply source across the globe. This study, therefore, examines the determinants of urban residents’ decisions to engage in UA and their choice of agriculture practices. Cross-sectional data was solicited from 430 urban dwellers through a multi-stage sampling technique. The data was analysed using descriptive as well as binary and multinomial logit regression models. The descriptive analysis shows that the cultivation of crops (34.7 %) predominates urban agricultural practices before crop-livestock integration (32.6 %) and livestock farming (32.6 %). The study identifies gender, age, religious affiliation, years of formal education, location of residence, household size, food insecurity status, availability of vacant land, extension access, and household income as significant determinants of urban households’ decision to participate in UA. The multinomial logit regression analysis revealed that urban farmers’ decision to practice only crop production is invariant between livestock-only production and integrated crop-livestock systems. When compared to the base category of the integrated crop-livestock system, the findings indicate that farmers’ educational background, food insecurity, engagement in salaried jobs, location, extension, and credit access are the main drivers of the decision to practice either crop-only or sole livestock production systems. The findings of this study have useful implications for the formulation of UA programs based on the different farming systems practiced in the study location.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解加纳库马西大都市居民对城市耕作制度的选择:土地使用政策的影响
城市环境中粮食不安全问题的加剧再次引发了关于在全球推广城市农业(UA)作为可持续替代粮食供应来源的讨论。因此,本研究探讨了城市居民决定从事都市农业及其农业实践选择的决定因素。本研究通过多阶段抽样技术从 430 名城市居民中收集了横截面数据。数据分析采用了描述性以及二元和多项式对数回归模型。描述性分析表明,在城市农业实践中,农作物种植(34.7%)占主导地位,然后才是农牧结合(32.6%)和畜牧业(32.6%)。研究发现,性别、年龄、宗教信仰、正规教育年限、居住地、家庭规模、粮食不安全状况、空地供应、推广机会和家庭收入是城市家庭决定参与普遍获得服务的重要决定因素。多项式对数回归分析表明,在纯畜牧业生产系统和作物-畜牧业综合系统之间,城市农民只从事作物生产的决定是不变的。与作物-畜牧综合系统的基础类别相比,研究结果表明,农民的教育背景、粮食不安全状况、从事受薪工作的情况、地点、推广和信贷渠道是决定只从事作物生产还是只从事畜牧生产的主要驱动因素。这项研究的结果对根据研究地点的不同耕作制度制定普遍获得服务计划具有有益的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking household food security under a changing climate in drought prone areas of Ethiopia Analysis of demand for land consolidation works in Poland – A case study of the Bałtów commune A mechanics-based theoretical framework of urban sprawl force: A case study in Nanjing, Wuxi, and Yangzhou, China Long-term landscape structure change in contrasting land occupation strategies of the Brazilian Amazon Co-design in policy development: Leveraging opportunities, addressing challenges, and proposing solutions for inclusive governance - Lessons from England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1