In vivo measurements in pediatric computed tomography with TLD: A correlation between CDTIvol values

IF 1.6 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Radiation Measurements Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107275
Alexsandro Guimarães , Felipe Borges , Carlos Ubeda , Cassiana Viccari , Carmen Sandra Guzmán Calcina , Thatiane Pianoschi , Mirko Salomón Alva-Sánchez
{"title":"In vivo measurements in pediatric computed tomography with TLD: A correlation between CDTIvol values","authors":"Alexsandro Guimarães ,&nbsp;Felipe Borges ,&nbsp;Carlos Ubeda ,&nbsp;Cassiana Viccari ,&nbsp;Carmen Sandra Guzmán Calcina ,&nbsp;Thatiane Pianoschi ,&nbsp;Mirko Salomón Alva-Sánchez","doi":"10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates pediatric Computed Tomography (CT) dosimetry, specifically in the thoracic and head regions, using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). The investigation, conducted at the Imaging Diagnostic Center of the Dom Vicente Scherer Hospital, involved two CT machines, the GE Optima 540 and Revolution EVO models. It aims to correlate in vivo TLD analysis with experimental CT Dose Index Volume (CTDIvol) values. The research reveals a maximum variation between machine-indicated CTDI values of 5.7% for the Optima 540 model and 6.8% for the Revolution EVO model at a voltage of 120 kV. Comparison with dose reference levels (DRL) from the United Kingdom and the United States indicates that the obtained values are below these standards, suggesting safe practices in the participating hospital. However, a larger sample size is recommended to establish local standards securely. In the thoracic region, nominal CTDI<sub>vol</sub> values indicate measurements around 150% lower than the dose values measured by TLD's, however, no correlation was found between the two variables (p-value = 0.09). In the head, nominal CTDI<sub>vol</sub> values varied on average 21% above the doses measured by TDL's, showing a strong correlation between the two quantities (p-value = 0.0002). The study highlights the importance of cautious interpretation of the CTDI<sub>vol</sub> and the need for continuous optimization of procedures to ensure safe practices and minimize the risks of radiation exposure in pediatric patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21055,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Measurements","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 107275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724002233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates pediatric Computed Tomography (CT) dosimetry, specifically in the thoracic and head regions, using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). The investigation, conducted at the Imaging Diagnostic Center of the Dom Vicente Scherer Hospital, involved two CT machines, the GE Optima 540 and Revolution EVO models. It aims to correlate in vivo TLD analysis with experimental CT Dose Index Volume (CTDIvol) values. The research reveals a maximum variation between machine-indicated CTDI values of 5.7% for the Optima 540 model and 6.8% for the Revolution EVO model at a voltage of 120 kV. Comparison with dose reference levels (DRL) from the United Kingdom and the United States indicates that the obtained values are below these standards, suggesting safe practices in the participating hospital. However, a larger sample size is recommended to establish local standards securely. In the thoracic region, nominal CTDIvol values indicate measurements around 150% lower than the dose values measured by TLD's, however, no correlation was found between the two variables (p-value = 0.09). In the head, nominal CTDIvol values varied on average 21% above the doses measured by TDL's, showing a strong correlation between the two quantities (p-value = 0.0002). The study highlights the importance of cautious interpretation of the CTDIvol and the need for continuous optimization of procedures to ensure safe practices and minimize the risks of radiation exposure in pediatric patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 TLD 进行儿科计算机断层扫描的活体测量:CDTIvol 值之间的相关性
本研究使用热释光剂量计 (TLD) 对小儿计算机断层扫描 (CT) 剂量测定进行了调查,特别是胸部和头部区域。这项研究在 Dom Vicente Scherer 医院的影像诊断中心进行,涉及两台 CT 机:GE Optima 540 和 Revolution EVO 型号。其目的是将体内 TLD 分析与实验 CT 剂量指数体积 (CTDIvol) 值联系起来。研究显示,在 120 千伏电压下,Optima 540 型号和 Revolution EVO 型号机器指示的 CTDI 值之间的最大差异分别为 5.7% 和 6.8%。与英国和美国的剂量参考水平(DRL)比较表明,所获得的数值低于这些标准,表明参与研究的医院采用了安全的操作方法。不过,建议扩大样本量,以安全地确定当地标准。在胸部区域,名义 CTDIvol 值显示测量值比 TLD 测量的剂量值低约 150%,但这两个变量之间没有相关性(p 值 = 0.09)。在头部,标称 CTDIvol 值平均比 TDL 测量的剂量值高出 21%,这表明这两个变量之间存在很强的相关性(p 值 = 0.0002)。这项研究强调了谨慎解释 CTDIvol 的重要性,以及不断优化程序以确保安全操作和最大限度降低儿科患者辐照风险的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Measurements
Radiation Measurements 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to publish papers that present advances in the following areas: spontaneous and stimulated luminescence (including scintillating materials, thermoluminescence, and optically stimulated luminescence); electron spin resonance of natural and synthetic materials; the physics, design and performance of radiation measurements (including computational modelling such as electronic transport simulations); the novel basic aspects of radiation measurement in medical physics. Studies of energy-transfer phenomena, track physics and microdosimetry are also of interest to the journal. Applications relevant to the journal, particularly where they present novel detection techniques, novel analytical approaches or novel materials, include: personal dosimetry (including dosimetric quantities, active/electronic and passive monitoring techniques for photon, neutron and charged-particle exposures); environmental dosimetry (including methodological advances and predictive models related to radon, but generally excluding local survey results of radon where the main aim is to establish the radiation risk to populations); cosmic and high-energy radiation measurements (including dosimetry, space radiation effects, and single event upsets); dosimetry-based archaeological and Quaternary dating; dosimetry-based approaches to thermochronometry; accident and retrospective dosimetry (including activation detectors), and dosimetry and measurements related to medical applications.
期刊最新文献
Photon energy estimation in diagnostic radiology using OSL dosimeters: Experimental validation and Monte Carlo simulations Review of real time 2D dosimetry in external radiotherapy: Advancements and techniques Exploration of dosimetry characteristics of PVA/MWCNT-OH nanocomposite for intraoperative electron radiotherapy Clinical evaluation of a new device for acceptance testing of Ru-106 plaques in ophthalmic brachytherapy Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1