When citizens legalize drugs

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS European Journal of Political Economy Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102599
Elena Lucchese , Paolo Roberti
{"title":"When citizens legalize drugs","authors":"Elena Lucchese ,&nbsp;Paolo Roberti","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The demand for drug legalization is remarkably heterogeneous across countries and over time. A theory is presented to show that ruling politicians can influence this demand by choosing the level of enforcement of drug laws which will influence their exposure to drug use and their views on legalization. If legalization has, overall, expected social benefits, politicians opposed to it will adopt a higher level of law enforcement than politicians in favor. In this case, the level of law enforcement is excessive with respect to the optimal level. If instead, legalizing the drug has overall expected social costs, then the opposite will be the case. The examples of the Netherlands and the US are used to test the model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51439,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Economy","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 102599"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268024001010/pdfft?md5=d2dd44a5bd6cbf36c0bd3f19236f65a5&pid=1-s2.0-S0176268024001010-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268024001010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The demand for drug legalization is remarkably heterogeneous across countries and over time. A theory is presented to show that ruling politicians can influence this demand by choosing the level of enforcement of drug laws which will influence their exposure to drug use and their views on legalization. If legalization has, overall, expected social benefits, politicians opposed to it will adopt a higher level of law enforcement than politicians in favor. In this case, the level of law enforcement is excessive with respect to the optimal level. If instead, legalizing the drug has overall expected social costs, then the opposite will be the case. The examples of the Netherlands and the US are used to test the model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当公民将毒品合法化时
不同国家和不同时期对毒品合法化的需求存在显著差异。本文提出的一个理论表明,执政的政治家可以通过选择毒品法律的执法水平来影响这种需求,而执法水平会影响他们对毒品使用的接触程度以及他们对毒品合法化的看法。如果合法化总体上具有预期的社会效益,那么反对合法化的政治家将比支持合法化的政治家采取更高水平的执法。在这种情况下,与最佳水平相比,执法水平过高。相反,如果毒品合法化会带来总体预期的社会成本,那么情况就会相反。我们以荷兰和美国为例,对这一模型进行检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Political Economy is to disseminate original theoretical and empirical research on economic phenomena within a scope that encompasses collective decision making, political behavior, and the role of institutions. Contributions are invited from the international community of researchers. Manuscripts must be published in English. Starting 2008, the European Journal of Political Economy is indexed in the Social Sciences Citation Index published by Thomson Scientific (formerly ISI).
期刊最新文献
Wealth inequality and mega events The evolution of affluent support for redistribution in Germany in the context of rising inequalities Macroeconomic effects from media coverage of the China–U.S. trade war on selected EU countries Political alliances and trade: Europe in a polarized world Beyond the party push: Gender differences in voters’ persuasion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1