{"title":"What caregiver’ count as neonatal danger signs? A systematic review and meta-analysis of South East Asian countries","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the prevalence of Knowledge of caregivers for neonatal danger signs. Registered in PROSPERO [CDR42022338605.]</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched, Cochrane I<sup>2</sup> statistics for heterogeneity and Random effects model for reporting the results was used. Egger tests with funnel plots were used to investigate publication bias.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Overall pooled prevalence of caregiver's knowledge towards IMNCI and other neonatal danger signs was 36.6 % (95 % CI = 28, 46.1) and 55.1 % [95 % CI = 46.9, 53] respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The knowledge of caregivers towards neonatal danger signs was inadequate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221339842400263X/pdfft?md5=d4089ece49d35f7d5546cc86899ec2e8&pid=1-s2.0-S221339842400263X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221339842400263X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To assess the prevalence of Knowledge of caregivers for neonatal danger signs. Registered in PROSPERO [CDR42022338605.]
Methodology
PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched, Cochrane I2 statistics for heterogeneity and Random effects model for reporting the results was used. Egger tests with funnel plots were used to investigate publication bias.
Result
Overall pooled prevalence of caregiver's knowledge towards IMNCI and other neonatal danger signs was 36.6 % (95 % CI = 28, 46.1) and 55.1 % [95 % CI = 46.9, 53] respectively.
Conclusion
The knowledge of caregivers towards neonatal danger signs was inadequate.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
