Caregiver burden and depression among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other nonheterosexual individuals in the United States: Analysis of BRFSS 2015–2018

Hui Xie, Chi Wen, Yannan Li, Nicholas Theodoropoulos, Qian Wang
{"title":"Caregiver burden and depression among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other nonheterosexual individuals in the United States: Analysis of BRFSS 2015–2018","authors":"Hui Xie,&nbsp;Chi Wen,&nbsp;Yannan Li,&nbsp;Nicholas Theodoropoulos,&nbsp;Qian Wang","doi":"10.1002/dvr2.12009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The number of caregivers in the US continues to rise. However, the epidemiology and mental health among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other nonheterosexual (LGB+) caregivers remain unknown. We aimed to characterize the epidemiology of caregiving burden/information among LGB+ caregivers in the United States, as well as to examine depression and related risk factors. By using the data from the 2015–2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), we conducted weighted hierarchical logistic regression models to explore the associations between depression, caregiving information, health behaviors, sex, and sexual orientation among an estimated population of 9,521,313 LGB+ caregivers. Among the caregivers aged 18–79 years, 4.81% identified as LGB+. Notably, 19.21% of the caregivers reported experiencing depression, with distinctive rates observed among male LGB+ caregivers and female LGB+ caregivers were 38.22% and 51.43%, respectively. Meanwhile, nearly 45.00% of male LGB+ caregivers offered care to nonrelatives, a significantly higher rate compared to their heterosexual counterparts (23.32%, p &lt; 0.001). The logistic regression models revealed that both male LGB+ caregivers (odds ratio [OR]: 3.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45–8.77) and female LGB+ caregivers (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.00–5.63) exhibited a higher likelihood of reporting depression compared to male heterosexual peers. Additionally, caregivers seeking support services for their caregiving responsibilities were more likely to report depression (OR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.12–1.94). Our study revealed higher caregiving burden and depression among LGB+ caregivers in the United States, warranting further research and targeted support to address their unique challenges and improve services to caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":100379,"journal":{"name":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dvr2.12009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dvr2.12009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of caregivers in the US continues to rise. However, the epidemiology and mental health among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other nonheterosexual (LGB+) caregivers remain unknown. We aimed to characterize the epidemiology of caregiving burden/information among LGB+ caregivers in the United States, as well as to examine depression and related risk factors. By using the data from the 2015–2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), we conducted weighted hierarchical logistic regression models to explore the associations between depression, caregiving information, health behaviors, sex, and sexual orientation among an estimated population of 9,521,313 LGB+ caregivers. Among the caregivers aged 18–79 years, 4.81% identified as LGB+. Notably, 19.21% of the caregivers reported experiencing depression, with distinctive rates observed among male LGB+ caregivers and female LGB+ caregivers were 38.22% and 51.43%, respectively. Meanwhile, nearly 45.00% of male LGB+ caregivers offered care to nonrelatives, a significantly higher rate compared to their heterosexual counterparts (23.32%, p < 0.001). The logistic regression models revealed that both male LGB+ caregivers (odds ratio [OR]: 3.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45–8.77) and female LGB+ caregivers (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.00–5.63) exhibited a higher likelihood of reporting depression compared to male heterosexual peers. Additionally, caregivers seeking support services for their caregiving responsibilities were more likely to report depression (OR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.12–1.94). Our study revealed higher caregiving burden and depression among LGB+ caregivers in the United States, warranting further research and targeted support to address their unique challenges and improve services to caregivers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国女同性恋者、男同性恋者、双性恋者和其他非异性恋者的照顾者负担和抑郁症:2015-2018年BRFSS分析
在美国,照顾者的人数持续上升。然而,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和其他非异性恋(LGB+)照顾者的流行病学和心理健康状况仍不为人知。我们旨在描述美国 LGB+ 照护者的照护负担/信息的流行病学特征,以及研究抑郁症和相关风险因素。通过使用 2015-2018 年行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)的数据,我们建立了加权分层逻辑回归模型,在估计的 9,521,313 名 LGB+ 照护者中探讨抑郁、照护信息、健康行为、性别和性取向之间的关联。在 18-79 岁的照顾者中,有 4.81% 的人被认定为 LGB+。值得注意的是,19.21% 的照护者表示曾经历过抑郁,男性 LGB+ 照护者和女性 LGB+ 照护者的抑郁率分别为 38.22% 和 51.43%。同时,近 45.00% 的男性 LGB+ 照护者向非亲属提供照护,这一比例明显高于异性恋照护者(23.32%,p <0.001)。逻辑回归模型显示,与男性异性恋同行相比,男性 LGB+ 照护者(几率比 [OR]:3.56;95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.45-8.77)和女性 LGB+ 照护者(OR:2.38;95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.00-5.63)报告抑郁的可能性更高。此外,因照顾责任而寻求支持服务的照顾者更有可能报告抑郁(OR:1.47;95% CI:1.12-1.94)。我们的研究表明,在美国,LGB+ 护理者的护理负担和抑郁程度更高,因此需要进一步研究并提供有针对性的支持,以应对他们面临的独特挑战并改善对护理者的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Exploring Experiences of Safety With LGBTQ+ Newcomers in Calgary, Alberta The Monolingual Campus and the Bilingual Campus: Ideological Debates on the Management of Language Diversity at Two Dutch Universities Exploring Counternarratives to Linguistic Privileging and Invisibility: Community Translingualism as a Mechanism for Resourcefulness Who Is Queer Enough for Queer Research?: The Issue of Absence Within Queer Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1