Plant-Based Diet and Survival Among Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

En Cheng, Fang-Shu Ou, Clare Gatten, Chao Ma, Alan P Venook, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Eileen M O’Reilly, Peter T Campbell, Chaoyuan Kuang, Bette J Caan, Charles D Blanke, Kimmie Ng, Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
{"title":"Plant-Based Diet and Survival Among Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer","authors":"En Cheng, Fang-Shu Ou, Clare Gatten, Chao Ma, Alan P Venook, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Eileen M O’Reilly, Peter T Campbell, Chaoyuan Kuang, Bette J Caan, Charles D Blanke, Kimmie Ng, Jeffrey A Meyerhardt","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Plant-based diet is associated with better survival among patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), but its association in metastatic CRC is unknown. Methods Using an NCI-sponsored trial (CALGB/SWOG 80405), we included 1,284 patients who completed validated food frequency questionnaires at the initiation of metastatic CRC treatment. We calculated three indices: overall plant-based diet index (PDI), which emphasized consumption of all plant foods while reducing animal food intake; healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI), which emphasized consumption of healthful plant foods such as whole grains, fruits, and vegetables; and unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI), which emphasized consumption of less healthful plant foods such as fruit juices, refined grains, and sugar-sweetened beverages. We estimated the associations of three indices (quintiles) with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results We observed 1,100 deaths and 1,204 progression events (median follow-up: 6.1 years). Compared to the lowest quintile, patients in the highest quintile of PDI had significantly better survival (HR for OS: 0.76 [0.62-0.94], P trend=0.004; PFS: 0.81 [0.66-0.99], P trend=0.09). Similar findings were observed for hPDI (HR for OS: 0.81 [0.65-1.01], P trend=0.053; PFS: 0.80 [0.65-0.98], P trend=0.04), whereas uPDI was not associated with worse survival (HR for OS: 1.16 [0.94-1.43], P trend=0.21; PFS: 1.12 [0.92-1.36], P trend=0.42). Conclusions Our study suggests that plant-based diet, especially when rich in healthful plant foods, is associated with better survival among patients with metastatic CRC. The cause of survival benefits warrants further investigation.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Plant-based diet is associated with better survival among patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), but its association in metastatic CRC is unknown. Methods Using an NCI-sponsored trial (CALGB/SWOG 80405), we included 1,284 patients who completed validated food frequency questionnaires at the initiation of metastatic CRC treatment. We calculated three indices: overall plant-based diet index (PDI), which emphasized consumption of all plant foods while reducing animal food intake; healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI), which emphasized consumption of healthful plant foods such as whole grains, fruits, and vegetables; and unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI), which emphasized consumption of less healthful plant foods such as fruit juices, refined grains, and sugar-sweetened beverages. We estimated the associations of three indices (quintiles) with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results We observed 1,100 deaths and 1,204 progression events (median follow-up: 6.1 years). Compared to the lowest quintile, patients in the highest quintile of PDI had significantly better survival (HR for OS: 0.76 [0.62-0.94], P trend=0.004; PFS: 0.81 [0.66-0.99], P trend=0.09). Similar findings were observed for hPDI (HR for OS: 0.81 [0.65-1.01], P trend=0.053; PFS: 0.80 [0.65-0.98], P trend=0.04), whereas uPDI was not associated with worse survival (HR for OS: 1.16 [0.94-1.43], P trend=0.21; PFS: 1.12 [0.92-1.36], P trend=0.42). Conclusions Our study suggests that plant-based diet, especially when rich in healthful plant foods, is associated with better survival among patients with metastatic CRC. The cause of survival benefits warrants further investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物性饮食与转移性结直肠癌患者的生存率
背景 植物性饮食与提高非转移性结直肠癌(CRC)患者的生存率有关,但与转移性 CRC 的关系尚不清楚。方法 通过一项由 NCI 赞助的试验(CALGB/SWOG 80405),我们纳入了 1284 名在转移性 CRC 治疗开始时填写了有效食物频率问卷的患者。我们计算了三个指数:总体植物性膳食指数(PDI),强调摄入所有植物性食物,同时减少动物性食物的摄入;有益健康的植物性膳食指数(hPDI),强调摄入有益健康的植物性食物,如全谷物、水果和蔬菜;不有益健康的植物性膳食指数(uPDI),强调摄入不太有益健康的植物性食物,如果汁、精制谷物和含糖饮料。我们采用多变量考克斯比例危险回归法估算了三种指数(五分位数)与总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的关系。结果 我们观察到 1100 例死亡和 1204 例病情进展事件(中位随访时间:6.1 年)。与最低五分位数相比,PDI最高五分位数患者的生存率明显更高(OS的HR:OS的HR:0.76 [0.62-0.94],P趋势=0.004;PFS:0.81 [0.66-0.99],P趋势=0.09)。hPDI也有类似的结果(OS的HR:0.81 [0.65-1.99], P趋势=0.09):OS的HR:0.81 [0.65-1.01],P趋势=0.053;PFS:0.80 [0.65-0.98],P趋势=0.04),而uPDI与较差的生存率无关(OS的HR:1.16 [0.94-1.01],P趋势=0.053):1.16 [0.94-1.43],P 趋势=0.21;PFS:1.12 [0.92-1.36],P 趋势=0.42)。结论 我们的研究表明,以植物为基础的饮食,尤其是富含有益健康的植物性食物时,与转移性 CRC 患者更佳的生存率相关。生存获益的原因值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Elevated risk of lung cancer among asian American females who have never smoked: an emerging cancer disparity First Cycle Toxicity and Survival in Patients with Rare Cancers Treated with Checkpoint Inhibitors The Association of Where Patients with Prostate Cancer Live and Receive Care on Racial Treatment Inequities Projected Outcomes of Reduced-Biopsy Management of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Implications for Relabeling Proinflammatory Dietary Pattern and Risk of Total and Subtypes of Breast Cancer Among U.S. Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1