Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in randomized clinical trials testing antibody-drug conjugates

Laura Pala, Federico Merlo, Isabella Sala, Eleonora Pagan, Chiara Oriecuia, Claudia Specchia, Chiara Catania, Emilia Cocorocchio, Daniele Laszlo, Giovanni Ceresoli, Marzia Locatelli, Tommaso De Pas, Alberto Zambelli, Javier Cortes, Giuseppe Giaccone, Kathleen N Moore, Aditya Bardia, Giuseppe Viale, Richard D Gelber, Vincenzo Bagnardi, Fabio Conforti
{"title":"Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in randomized clinical trials testing antibody-drug conjugates","authors":"Laura Pala, Federico Merlo, Isabella Sala, Eleonora Pagan, Chiara Oriecuia, Claudia Specchia, Chiara Catania, Emilia Cocorocchio, Daniele Laszlo, Giovanni Ceresoli, Marzia Locatelli, Tommaso De Pas, Alberto Zambelli, Javier Cortes, Giuseppe Giaccone, Kathleen N Moore, Aditya Bardia, Giuseppe Viale, Richard D Gelber, Vincenzo Bagnardi, Fabio Conforti","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The surrogacy of overall response-rate (ORR) or progression-free survival (PFS) for overall survival (OS) at the trial-level in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing antibody-drugs conjugates (ADC) has never been investigated. Methods RCTs testing ADCs in patients with advanced solid tumors and reporting data on OS and PFS and/or ORR were analyzed. The main objective was to assess the trial-level association between the surrogate endpoints (ORR or PFS) and the reference endpoint (OS), overall and in subgroups of trials defined by tumor type, number of previous lines of systemic treatments, and specific ADC features. Results Twenty-five RCTs, for a total of 26 treatment comparisons and 11,729 patients, were included in the analysis. In 21 comparisons the ADC was administered as monotherapy, and in 16 was tested in patients with breast cancer. The association between the hazard ratio for OS and relative risk of ORR was moderate: the R2 from a model adjusted by tumor type was 0.47 (95%CI,0.11-0.83).The association between the hazard ratios for OS and PFS was strong: the R2 from the adjusted model was 0.79 (95%CI,0.66-0.92). Cross-validation analyses showed similar results. Consistent results were obtained across all the subgroups analyzed, with the notable exception of the subgroup of trials testing ADCs for breast cancer, where the association between OS and ORR appeared strong (R2=0.77; 95%CI,0.51-0.90). Conclusions In RCTs evaluating ADCs in advanced solid tumors, PFS serves as a robust surrogate endpoint for OS, offering greater reliability than ORR and adequately supporting accelerated approval of ADCs in future trials.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The surrogacy of overall response-rate (ORR) or progression-free survival (PFS) for overall survival (OS) at the trial-level in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing antibody-drugs conjugates (ADC) has never been investigated. Methods RCTs testing ADCs in patients with advanced solid tumors and reporting data on OS and PFS and/or ORR were analyzed. The main objective was to assess the trial-level association between the surrogate endpoints (ORR or PFS) and the reference endpoint (OS), overall and in subgroups of trials defined by tumor type, number of previous lines of systemic treatments, and specific ADC features. Results Twenty-five RCTs, for a total of 26 treatment comparisons and 11,729 patients, were included in the analysis. In 21 comparisons the ADC was administered as monotherapy, and in 16 was tested in patients with breast cancer. The association between the hazard ratio for OS and relative risk of ORR was moderate: the R2 from a model adjusted by tumor type was 0.47 (95%CI,0.11-0.83).The association between the hazard ratios for OS and PFS was strong: the R2 from the adjusted model was 0.79 (95%CI,0.66-0.92). Cross-validation analyses showed similar results. Consistent results were obtained across all the subgroups analyzed, with the notable exception of the subgroup of trials testing ADCs for breast cancer, where the association between OS and ORR appeared strong (R2=0.77; 95%CI,0.51-0.90). Conclusions In RCTs evaluating ADCs in advanced solid tumors, PFS serves as a robust surrogate endpoint for OS, offering greater reliability than ORR and adequately supporting accelerated approval of ADCs in future trials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景 从未研究过在随机临床试验(RCT)中检测抗体药物结合物(ADC)的试验水平上,总反应率(ORR)或无进展生存期(PFS)对总生存期(OS)的替代性。方法 分析了在晚期实体瘤患者中测试 ADC 并报告 OS、PFS 和/或 ORR 数据的随机临床试验。主要目的是评估代用终点(ORR或PFS)与参考终点(OS)之间在试验层面的关联性,包括总体关联性以及按肿瘤类型、既往接受过的系统治疗次数和特定ADC特征定义的试验亚组中的关联性。结果 共有25项RCT纳入分析,共进行了26项治疗对比,11729名患者接受了治疗。在 21 项比较中,ADC 作为单一疗法使用,在 16 项比较中,对乳腺癌患者进行了测试。OS的危险比与ORR的相对风险之间的关系适中:根据肿瘤类型调整后的模型的R2为0.47(95%CI,0.11-0.83)。OS的危险比与PFS之间的关系较强:调整后的模型的R2为0.79(95%CI,0.66-0.92)。交叉验证分析显示了类似的结果。所分析的所有亚组都得到了一致的结果,但测试 ADC 治疗乳腺癌的试验亚组是个明显的例外,在该亚组中,OS 和 ORR 之间的关联似乎很强(R2=0.77;95%CI,0.51-0.90)。结论 在评估 ADC 治疗晚期实体瘤的 RCT 中,PFS 可作为 OS 的可靠替代终点,比 ORR 更可靠,可充分支持 ADC 在未来试验中加速审批。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
National trends in oncology specialists’ EHR inbox work, 2019–2022 Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in randomized clinical trials testing antibody-drug conjugates Structural inequities in the availability of prostate cancer clinical trial opportunities Pre- and post-diagnostic use of antihypertensive medications and stage I-III colorectal cancer survival: prospective cohort study Proportion of patients in phase 2 oncology trials receiving treatments that are ultimately approved
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1