Accounting and accountability for managing diversity tensions in hybrid organisations

IF 5.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE British Accounting Review Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bar.2024.101470
Giuseppe Grossi , Aziza Laguecir , Laurence Ferry , Basil Tucker
{"title":"Accounting and accountability for managing diversity tensions in hybrid organisations","authors":"Giuseppe Grossi ,&nbsp;Aziza Laguecir ,&nbsp;Laurence Ferry ,&nbsp;Basil Tucker","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hybrid organisations are organisational forms that use different resources, governance models and institutional logics derived from public, private, for-profit and nonprofit. Hybridity can be referred to on multiple levels of analysis: macro-level related to the society, meso-level related to specific organisational fields or organisations, or micro-level related to groups or individual actors. This paper provides a comprehensive comment on the state of research on accounting and accountability themes in hybrid organisations. The paper also locates the articles included in this special section, identifying avenues for further research. The state of research in hybrid organisations shows that a growing number of studies focus on accounting and accountability practices in different types of hybrid organisations operating in different fields. This paper identifies diversity tensions in accounting and accountability for single hybrid organisations or networks operating at different levels, compromising multiple values and expectations of audiences/forums. The six articles in the special setion fill this gap in addressing questions of for who, for what, and where by exploring the multiple actors, values and forums involved in accounting and accountability practices in hybrid organisations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"56 6","pages":"Article 101470"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838924002348/pdfft?md5=83086317f4a2cbe7231cb5ce39975c68&pid=1-s2.0-S0890838924002348-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838924002348","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hybrid organisations are organisational forms that use different resources, governance models and institutional logics derived from public, private, for-profit and nonprofit. Hybridity can be referred to on multiple levels of analysis: macro-level related to the society, meso-level related to specific organisational fields or organisations, or micro-level related to groups or individual actors. This paper provides a comprehensive comment on the state of research on accounting and accountability themes in hybrid organisations. The paper also locates the articles included in this special section, identifying avenues for further research. The state of research in hybrid organisations shows that a growing number of studies focus on accounting and accountability practices in different types of hybrid organisations operating in different fields. This paper identifies diversity tensions in accounting and accountability for single hybrid organisations or networks operating at different levels, compromising multiple values and expectations of audiences/forums. The six articles in the special setion fill this gap in addressing questions of for who, for what, and where by exploring the multiple actors, values and forums involved in accounting and accountability practices in hybrid organisations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合型组织中管理多样性紧张局势的会计和问责制
混合型组织是指使用不同资源、管理模式和机构逻辑的组织形式,这些资源、管理模式和机构逻辑来自公共、私营、营利和非营利组织。混合性可以从多个层面分析:与社会相关的宏观层面,与特定组织领域或组织相关的中观层面,或与团体或个体行为者相关的微观层面。本文全面评述了混合型组织中会计与问责主题的研究现状。本文还对本专节所收录的文章进行了定位,指出了进一步研究的途径。混合型组织的研究现状表明,越来越多的研究关注在不同领域运作的不同类型混合型组织的会计与问责实践。本文指出了在不同层面运作的单个混合组织或网络在会计和问责方面存在的多样性紧张关系,这些组织或网络要兼顾受众/论坛的多种价值观和期望。这套特辑中的六篇文章通过探讨混合型组织会计与问责实践中涉及的多方参与者、价值观和论坛,填补了这一空白,解决了为谁、做什么和在哪里的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Accounting Review
British Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: The British Accounting Review*is pleased to publish original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of accounting and finance. The journal is eclectic and pluralistic and contributions are welcomed across a wide range of research methodologies (e.g. analytical, archival, experimental, survey and qualitative case methods) and topics (e.g. financial accounting, management accounting, finance and financial management, auditing, public sector accounting, social and environmental accounting; accounting education and accounting history), evidence from UK and non-UK sources are equally acceptable.
期刊最新文献
The hidden cost of organisation capital: Evidence from trade credit CEO equity incentive duration and expected crash risk Exploring the acquisition behavior of penny stock firms Investor behavior around targeted liquidity announcements Capitalism and the return on capital employed. Some further evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1