Factors associated with cancer treatment resumption after ICU stay in patients with solid tumors.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Annals of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1186/s13613-024-01366-3
Soraya Benguerfi, Ondine Messéant, Benoit Painvin, Christophe Camus, Adel Maamar, Arnaud Gacouin, Charles Ricordel, Jean Reignier, Emmanuel Canet, Julien Edeline, Jean-Marc Tadié
{"title":"Factors associated with cancer treatment resumption after ICU stay in patients with solid tumors.","authors":"Soraya Benguerfi, Ondine Messéant, Benoit Painvin, Christophe Camus, Adel Maamar, Arnaud Gacouin, Charles Ricordel, Jean Reignier, Emmanuel Canet, Julien Edeline, Jean-Marc Tadié","doi":"10.1186/s13613-024-01366-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-intensive care syndrome could be responsible for inability to receive proper cancer treatment after ICU stay in patients with solid tumors (ST). Our purpose was to determine the factors associated with cancer treatment resumption and the impact of cancer treatment on the outcome of patients with ST after ICU stay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study including all patients with ST admitted to the ICU between 2014 and 2019 in a French University-affiliated Hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 219 patients were included. Median SAPS II at ICU admission was 44.0 [IQR 32.8, 66.3]. Among the 136 patients who survived the ICU stay, 81 (59.6%) received cancer treatment after ICU discharge. There was an important increase in patients with poor performance status (PS) of 3 or 4 after ICU stay (16.2% at admission vs. 44.5% of patients who survived), with significant PS decline following the ICU stay (median difference - 1.5, 95% confidence interval [-1.5-1.0], p < 0.001). The difference between the PS after and before ICU stay (delta PS) was independently associated with inability to receive cancer treatment (Odds ratio OR 0.34, 95%CI 0.18-0.56, p value < 0.001) and with 1-year mortality in patients who survived at ICU discharge (Hazard ratio HR 1.76, 95%CI 1.34-2.31, p value < 0.001). PS before ICU stay (OR 3.73, 95%IC 2.01-7.82, p value < 0.001) and length of stay (OR 1.23, 95%CI 1.06-1.49, p value 0.018) were independently associated with poor PS after ICU stay. Survival rates at ICU discharge, at 1 and 3 years were 62.3% (n = 136), 27.3% (n = 59) and 17.1% (n = 37), respectively. The median survival for patients who resumed cancer treatment after ICU stay was 771 days (95%CI 376-1058), compared to 29 days (95%CI 15-49) for those who did not resume treatment (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delta PS, before and after ICU stay, stands out as a critical determinant of cancer treatment resumption and survival after ICU stay. Multidisciplinary intervention to improve the general condition of these patients, in ICU and after ICU stay, may improve access to cancer treatment and long-term survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01366-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-intensive care syndrome could be responsible for inability to receive proper cancer treatment after ICU stay in patients with solid tumors (ST). Our purpose was to determine the factors associated with cancer treatment resumption and the impact of cancer treatment on the outcome of patients with ST after ICU stay.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including all patients with ST admitted to the ICU between 2014 and 2019 in a French University-affiliated Hospital.

Results: A total of 219 patients were included. Median SAPS II at ICU admission was 44.0 [IQR 32.8, 66.3]. Among the 136 patients who survived the ICU stay, 81 (59.6%) received cancer treatment after ICU discharge. There was an important increase in patients with poor performance status (PS) of 3 or 4 after ICU stay (16.2% at admission vs. 44.5% of patients who survived), with significant PS decline following the ICU stay (median difference - 1.5, 95% confidence interval [-1.5-1.0], p < 0.001). The difference between the PS after and before ICU stay (delta PS) was independently associated with inability to receive cancer treatment (Odds ratio OR 0.34, 95%CI 0.18-0.56, p value < 0.001) and with 1-year mortality in patients who survived at ICU discharge (Hazard ratio HR 1.76, 95%CI 1.34-2.31, p value < 0.001). PS before ICU stay (OR 3.73, 95%IC 2.01-7.82, p value < 0.001) and length of stay (OR 1.23, 95%CI 1.06-1.49, p value 0.018) were independently associated with poor PS after ICU stay. Survival rates at ICU discharge, at 1 and 3 years were 62.3% (n = 136), 27.3% (n = 59) and 17.1% (n = 37), respectively. The median survival for patients who resumed cancer treatment after ICU stay was 771 days (95%CI 376-1058), compared to 29 days (95%CI 15-49) for those who did not resume treatment (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Delta PS, before and after ICU stay, stands out as a critical determinant of cancer treatment resumption and survival after ICU stay. Multidisciplinary intervention to improve the general condition of these patients, in ICU and after ICU stay, may improve access to cancer treatment and long-term survival.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实体瘤患者入住重症监护室后恢复癌症治疗的相关因素。
背景:重症监护后综合征可能是导致实体瘤(ST)患者在入住ICU后无法接受适当癌症治疗的原因。我们的目的是确定与癌症治疗恢复相关的因素,以及癌症治疗对重症监护室住院后实体瘤患者预后的影响:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了一家法国大学附属医院在2014年至2019年期间入住重症监护室的所有ST患者:结果:共纳入219名患者。入住重症监护室时的 SAPS II 中位数为 44.0 [IQR 32.8,66.3]。在重症监护室存活的 136 名患者中,81 人(59.6%)在重症监护室出院后接受了癌症治疗。入住重症监护室后,表现状态(PS)为 3 或 4 差的患者大幅增加(入院时为 16.2%,而存活患者为 44.5%),入住重症监护室后,PS 显著下降(中位数差异-1.5,95% 置信区间[-1.5-1.0],P 结论:重症监护室前后的 Delta PS(PS)差异为 1.5,95% 置信区间[-1.5-1.0]:入住重症监护室前后的Delta PS是重症监护室患者恢复癌症治疗和存活的关键因素。采取多学科干预措施,改善这些患者在重症监护室和重症监护室住院后的总体状况,可提高癌症治疗的可及性和长期生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
期刊最新文献
Changes in portal pulsatility index induced by a fluid challenge in patients with haemodynamic instability and systemic venous congestion: a prospective cohort study. Corticosteroid treatment in COVID-19 patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: benefit from rational use - authors' reply. Corticosteroid treatment in COVID-19 patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: benefit from rational use. Early sedation using ciprofol for intensive care unit patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a pooled post-hoc analysis of data from phase 2 and phase 3 trials. Methodologies and clinical applications of lower limb muscle ultrasound in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1