Thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit: diagnosis and management.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Annals of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1186/s13613-025-01447-x
Frédéric Pène, Lene Russell, Cécile Aubron
{"title":"Thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit: diagnosis and management.","authors":"Frédéric Pène, Lene Russell, Cécile Aubron","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01447-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This narrative review aims to describe the epidemiology and aetiologies of thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients, the bleeding risk assessment in thrombocytopenic patients, and provide an update on platelet transfusion indications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thrombocytopenia is a common disorder in critically ill patients. The classic definition relies on an absolute platelet count below 150 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L. Alternatively, the definition has extended to a relative decrease in platelet count (typically within a range of >30->50% decrease) from baseline, yet remaining above 150 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L. Thrombocytopenia may result from multiple mechanisms depending upon the underlying conditions and the current clinical setting. Regardless of the causes, thrombocytopenia accounts as an independent determinant of poor outcomes in critically ill patients, albeit often of unclear interpretation. Nevertheless, it is well established that thrombocytopenia is associated with an increased incidence of bleeding complications. However, alternative factors also contribute to the risk of bleeding, making it difficult to establish definite links between nadir platelet counts at the expense of potential adverse events. Platelet transfusion represents the primary supportive treatment of thrombocytopenia to prevent or treat bleeding. As randomised controlled trials comparing different platelet count thresholds for prophylactic platelet transfusion in the ICU are lacking, the prophylactic transfusion strategy is largely derived from studies performed in stable haematology patients. Similarly, the platelet count transfusion threshold to secure invasive procedures remains based on a low level of evidence. Indications of platelet transfusions for the treatment of severe bleeding in thrombocytopenic patients remain largely empirical, with platelet count thresholds ranging from 50 to 100 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L. In addition, early and aggressive platelet transfusion is part of massive transfusion protocols in the setting of severe trauma-related haemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients is very frequent with various etiologies, and is associated with worsened prognosis, with or without bleeding complications. Interventional trials focused on critically ill patients are eagerly needed to better delineate the benefits and harms of platelet transfusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01447-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This narrative review aims to describe the epidemiology and aetiologies of thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients, the bleeding risk assessment in thrombocytopenic patients, and provide an update on platelet transfusion indications.

Results: Thrombocytopenia is a common disorder in critically ill patients. The classic definition relies on an absolute platelet count below 150 × 109/L. Alternatively, the definition has extended to a relative decrease in platelet count (typically within a range of >30->50% decrease) from baseline, yet remaining above 150 × 109/L. Thrombocytopenia may result from multiple mechanisms depending upon the underlying conditions and the current clinical setting. Regardless of the causes, thrombocytopenia accounts as an independent determinant of poor outcomes in critically ill patients, albeit often of unclear interpretation. Nevertheless, it is well established that thrombocytopenia is associated with an increased incidence of bleeding complications. However, alternative factors also contribute to the risk of bleeding, making it difficult to establish definite links between nadir platelet counts at the expense of potential adverse events. Platelet transfusion represents the primary supportive treatment of thrombocytopenia to prevent or treat bleeding. As randomised controlled trials comparing different platelet count thresholds for prophylactic platelet transfusion in the ICU are lacking, the prophylactic transfusion strategy is largely derived from studies performed in stable haematology patients. Similarly, the platelet count transfusion threshold to secure invasive procedures remains based on a low level of evidence. Indications of platelet transfusions for the treatment of severe bleeding in thrombocytopenic patients remain largely empirical, with platelet count thresholds ranging from 50 to 100 × 109/L. In addition, early and aggressive platelet transfusion is part of massive transfusion protocols in the setting of severe trauma-related haemorrhage.

Conclusion: Thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients is very frequent with various etiologies, and is associated with worsened prognosis, with or without bleeding complications. Interventional trials focused on critically ill patients are eagerly needed to better delineate the benefits and harms of platelet transfusions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:这篇叙述性综述旨在描述重症患者血小板减少症的流行病学和病因、血小板减少症患者的出血风险评估,并提供血小板输注适应症的最新情况:血小板减少症是危重病人的常见疾病。经典的定义是血小板绝对计数低于 150 × 109/L。另外,该定义也扩展到血小板计数比基线相对减少(通常在减少 >30%->50% 的范围内),但仍高于 150 × 109/L。血小板减少症可能由多种机制导致,具体取决于基础疾病和当前的临床环境。无论原因如何,血小板减少症都是危重病人不良预后的一个独立决定因素,但往往解释不清。然而,血小板减少与出血并发症发生率增加有关,这一点已得到公认。然而,其他因素也会导致出血风险,因此很难确定以潜在不良事件为代价的最低血小板计数与出血风险之间的明确联系。血小板输注是血小板减少症预防或治疗出血的主要支持性治疗方法。由于缺乏对重症监护病房预防性血小板输注的不同血小板计数阈值进行比较的随机对照试验,预防性输注策略主要来自于对稳定型血液病患者的研究。同样,确保侵入性手术的血小板输注阈值仍以低水平的证据为基础。血小板减少患者治疗严重出血时的血小板输注指征在很大程度上仍是经验性的,血小板计数阈值从 50 到 100 × 109/L 不等。此外,在严重创伤相关出血的情况下,早期积极输注血小板是大量输血方案的一部分:结论:危重病人血小板减少症的发病率很高,病因多种多样,与预后恶化有关,伴有或不伴有出血并发症。急需对危重病人进行干预性试验,以更好地界定输注血小板的利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
期刊最新文献
Mechanical power is not associated with mortality in COVID-19 mechanically ventilated patients. AI for the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill and surgical patients: focus on clinical applications. Thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit: diagnosis and management. [18F]FDG PET/CT identifies infectious and inflammatory foci in persistent critical illness. Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) in the management of sepsis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1