Patient pathways for four major chronic respiratory diseases in England between 2008 and 2021.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMJ Open Respiratory Research Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002273
Anne E Ioannides, Ann D Morgan, Jennifer K Quint
{"title":"Patient pathways for four major chronic respiratory diseases in England between 2008 and 2021.","authors":"Anne E Ioannides, Ann D Morgan, Jennifer K Quint","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Not all chronic diseases have clear pathways and time targets for diagnosis. We explored pathways and timings for four major chronic respiratory diseases in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using deidentified electronic healthcare records from Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, we derived cohorts of patients diagnosed with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), ILD or bronchiectasis at three time periods (2008/2009, 2018/2019 and 2020/2021). We followed people 2 years before and 2 years after diagnosis, calculating the proportion of people who presented with symptoms, underwent diagnostic tests, were treated and consulted healthcare (primary or secondary) and calculated time intervals between events. We repeated analyses by socioeconomic status and geographical region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We descriptively studied patient pathways for 429 619 individuals across all time frames and diseases. Most people (>87%) had first evidence of diagnosis in primary care. The proportion of people reporting symptoms prior to diagnosis was similar for asthma, COPD and ILD (41.0%-57.9%) and higher in bronchiectasis (67.9%-71.8%). The proportion undergoing diagnostic tests was high for COPD and bronchiectasis (77.6%-89.2%) and lower for asthma (14%-32.7%) and ILD (2.6%-3.3%). The proportion of people undergoing diagnostic tests decreased in 2020/2021 for all diseases, mostly COPD. Time (months) (median (IQR)) between symptoms and diagnosis, averaged over three time periods, was lowest in asthma (~7.5 (1.3-16.0)), followed by COPD (~8.6 (1.8-17.2)), ILD (~10.1 (3.6-18.0)) and bronchiectasis (~13.5 (5.9-19.8)). Time from symptoms to diagnosis increased by ~2 months in asthma and COPD over the three time periods. Although most patients were symptomatically treated prior to diagnosis, time between diagnosis and postdiagnostic treatment was around 4 months for ILD, 3 months for bronchiectasis and instantaneous for asthma and COPD. Socioeconomic status and regional trends showed little disparity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current pathways demonstrate missed opportunities to diagnose and manage disease and to improve disease coding.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Not all chronic diseases have clear pathways and time targets for diagnosis. We explored pathways and timings for four major chronic respiratory diseases in England.

Methods: Using deidentified electronic healthcare records from Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, we derived cohorts of patients diagnosed with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), ILD or bronchiectasis at three time periods (2008/2009, 2018/2019 and 2020/2021). We followed people 2 years before and 2 years after diagnosis, calculating the proportion of people who presented with symptoms, underwent diagnostic tests, were treated and consulted healthcare (primary or secondary) and calculated time intervals between events. We repeated analyses by socioeconomic status and geographical region.

Results: We descriptively studied patient pathways for 429 619 individuals across all time frames and diseases. Most people (>87%) had first evidence of diagnosis in primary care. The proportion of people reporting symptoms prior to diagnosis was similar for asthma, COPD and ILD (41.0%-57.9%) and higher in bronchiectasis (67.9%-71.8%). The proportion undergoing diagnostic tests was high for COPD and bronchiectasis (77.6%-89.2%) and lower for asthma (14%-32.7%) and ILD (2.6%-3.3%). The proportion of people undergoing diagnostic tests decreased in 2020/2021 for all diseases, mostly COPD. Time (months) (median (IQR)) between symptoms and diagnosis, averaged over three time periods, was lowest in asthma (~7.5 (1.3-16.0)), followed by COPD (~8.6 (1.8-17.2)), ILD (~10.1 (3.6-18.0)) and bronchiectasis (~13.5 (5.9-19.8)). Time from symptoms to diagnosis increased by ~2 months in asthma and COPD over the three time periods. Although most patients were symptomatically treated prior to diagnosis, time between diagnosis and postdiagnostic treatment was around 4 months for ILD, 3 months for bronchiectasis and instantaneous for asthma and COPD. Socioeconomic status and regional trends showed little disparity.

Conclusion: Current pathways demonstrate missed opportunities to diagnose and manage disease and to improve disease coding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2008 至 2021 年间英格兰四种主要慢性呼吸道疾病的患者路径。
背景:并非所有慢性病都有明确的诊断路径和时间目标。我们探讨了英格兰四种主要慢性呼吸系统疾病的诊断路径和时间:我们利用与医院病历统计(Hospital Episode Statistics)相连接的临床实践研究数据链(Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum)中的去身份化电子医疗记录,得出了在三个时间段(2008/2009、2018/2019 和 2020/2021)被诊断为哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、ILD 或支气管扩张症的患者队列。我们对确诊前 2 年和确诊后 2 年的患者进行了跟踪调查,计算了出现症状、接受诊断检测、接受治疗和就医(初级或中级)的患者比例,并计算了事件之间的时间间隔。我们按社会经济地位和地理区域重复进行了分析:我们描述性地研究了 429 619 人在不同时间段和不同疾病下的就医路径。大多数人(>87%)在初级医疗机构首次确诊。哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺病和 ILD 患者在确诊前报告症状的比例相似(41.0%-57.9%),而支气管扩张症患者报告症状的比例更高(67.9%-71.8%)。接受诊断检测的比例在慢性阻塞性肺病和支气管扩张症中较高(77.6%-89.2%),在哮喘(14%-32.7%)和 ILD(2.6%-3.3%)中较低。2020/2021 年,所有疾病(主要是慢性阻塞性肺病)接受诊断检测的人数比例均有所下降。从症状到确诊的时间(月)(中位数(IQR)),按三个时间段的平均值计算,哮喘最低(约7.5(1.3-16.0)),其次是慢性阻塞性肺病(约8.6(1.8-17.2))、ILD(约10.1(3.6-18.0))和支气管扩张(约13.5(5.9-19.8))。在这三个时间段内,哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病患者从出现症状到确诊的时间增加了约 2 个月。虽然大多数患者在确诊前都接受了对症治疗,但从确诊到诊断后治疗的时间,ILD 为 4 个月左右,支气管扩张症为 3 个月,而哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病则是瞬间完成。社会经济地位和地区趋势几乎没有差异:结论:目前的治疗路径表明,在诊断和管理疾病以及改善疾病编码方面错失了良机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Firefighters' occupational exposure to air pollution: impact on COPD and asthma-study protocol. Risk factors for incidence of interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pleural effusion in acute pulmonary embolism: characteristics and relevance. Pim1 inactivating induces RUNX3 upregulation that improves/alleviates airway inflammation and mucus hypersecretion in vitro and in vivo. Agreement and comparative accuracy of instability criteria at discharge for predicting adverse events in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1