The relationship between morningness-eveningness and naturalness bias.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY Chronobiology International Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1080/07420528.2024.2397390
Heng Li
{"title":"The relationship between morningness-eveningness and naturalness bias.","authors":"Heng Li","doi":"10.1080/07420528.2024.2397390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The naturalness bias in which people perceive natural items to be safer, healthier, and better than synthetic alternatives has been found to be associated with numerous individual difference variables (e.g. connectedness to nature and religiosity). However, no research has examined the role of morningness-eveningness in influencing preferences for naturalness. Here, we propose that evening individuals may exhibit a weaker preference for naturalness compared to morning individuals due to their greater exposure to artificial lighting, technology, and stimuli. To systematically test our theoretical perspective, we conducted three complementary and high-powered studies. In an online survey (Study 1), student participants with a stronger evening orientation displayed a diminished preference for natural drugs compared to those with a morning orientation. Using a sample of community adults, Study 2 replicated the findings of Study 1 in a real-world, behavioral context. Study 3 examined the relationship between morningness-eveningness and preference for naturalness within the domain of beverages. The results revealed that individuals with an evening-orientation had decreased odds of selecting natural water without minerals. Taken together, the findings suggest that an individual's diurnal preference toward eveningness may have implications for their bias toward and perception of naturalness across various domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":10294,"journal":{"name":"Chronobiology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronobiology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2024.2397390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The naturalness bias in which people perceive natural items to be safer, healthier, and better than synthetic alternatives has been found to be associated with numerous individual difference variables (e.g. connectedness to nature and religiosity). However, no research has examined the role of morningness-eveningness in influencing preferences for naturalness. Here, we propose that evening individuals may exhibit a weaker preference for naturalness compared to morning individuals due to their greater exposure to artificial lighting, technology, and stimuli. To systematically test our theoretical perspective, we conducted three complementary and high-powered studies. In an online survey (Study 1), student participants with a stronger evening orientation displayed a diminished preference for natural drugs compared to those with a morning orientation. Using a sample of community adults, Study 2 replicated the findings of Study 1 in a real-world, behavioral context. Study 3 examined the relationship between morningness-eveningness and preference for naturalness within the domain of beverages. The results revealed that individuals with an evening-orientation had decreased odds of selecting natural water without minerals. Taken together, the findings suggest that an individual's diurnal preference toward eveningness may have implications for their bias toward and perception of naturalness across various domains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晨昏度与自然度偏差之间的关系。
人们认为天然物品比人工合成物品更安全、更健康、更好,这种自然性偏好与许多个体差异变量(如与自然的联系和宗教信仰)有关。然而,还没有研究探讨过晨昏对自然性偏好的影响。在此,我们提出,与早晨的个体相比,傍晚的个体可能表现出更弱的自然性偏好,这是因为他们更容易接触到人工照明、技术和刺激。为了系统地验证我们的理论观点,我们进行了三项互补性强的研究。在一项在线调查(研究 1)中,与早晨倾向的人相比,晚上倾向较强的学生参与者对自然药物的偏好有所降低。研究 2 以社区成年人为样本,在真实世界的行为背景下重复了研究 1 的发现。研究 3 探讨了饮料领域中的早-晚倾向与对天然性偏好之间的关系。结果显示,晚间取向的人选择不含矿物质的天然水的几率较低。综上所述,研究结果表明,一个人的昼夜偏好可能会影响他们在不同领域对天然性的偏好和感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chronobiology International
Chronobiology International 生物-生理学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
110
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Chronobiology International is the journal of biological and medical rhythm research. It is a transdisciplinary journal focusing on biological rhythm phenomena of all life forms. The journal publishes groundbreaking articles plus authoritative review papers, short communications of work in progress, case studies, and letters to the editor, for example, on genetic and molecular mechanisms of insect, animal and human biological timekeeping, including melatonin and pineal gland rhythms. It also publishes applied topics, for example, shiftwork, chronotypes, and associated personality traits; chronobiology and chronotherapy of sleep, cardiovascular, pulmonary, psychiatric, and other medical conditions. Articles in the journal pertain to basic and applied chronobiology, and to methods, statistics, and instrumentation for biological rhythm study. Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/page/cbi/Description
期刊最新文献
Cognitive correlates of circadian rhythm and sleep-wake behaviour in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Chronotype, sleep quality, impulsivity and aggression in patients with borderline personality disorder and healthy controls. Cognitive impairment induced by circadian rhythm disorders involves hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor reduction and amyloid-β deposition. Circadian rhythm in hypertension: An updated bibliometrics analysis and knowledge mapping from 1990 to 2022 Investigating the interplay of chronotypes, neuropsychiatric dimensions, demographic and clinical characteristics and disability in migraine patients: A cross-sectional assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1