Randomized Invitation to Systematic NT-proBNP and ECG Screening in 75-Year Olds to Detect Atrial Fibrillation -STROKESTOP II.

IF 35.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071176
Katrin Kemp Gudmundsdottir, Emma Svennberg, Leif Friberg, Tove Hygrell, Viveka Frykman, Faris Al-Khalili, Ziad Hijazi, Marten Rosenqvist, Johan Engdahl
{"title":"Randomized Invitation to Systematic NT-proBNP and ECG Screening in 75-Year Olds to Detect Atrial Fibrillation -STROKESTOP II.","authors":"Katrin Kemp Gudmundsdottir, Emma Svennberg, Leif Friberg, Tove Hygrell, Viveka Frykman, Faris Al-Khalili, Ziad Hijazi, Marten Rosenqvist, Johan Engdahl","doi":"10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Guidelines have suggested screening for atrial fibrillation to enable early treatment and avoid downstream negative clinical events. We aimed to determine if atrial fibrillation screening potentially enhanced by NT-proBNP would reduce stroke or systemic embolism incidence as compared to in a control group and to determine if it was safe for those with low NT-proBNP concentrations to forfeit prolonged screening. <b>Methods:</b> In this randomized controlled trial all 75/76-year-old individuals in Stockholm Region, Sweden were randomized 1:1 to be invited to screening or serve as a control group. NT-proBNP concentration were measured and a single-lead-ECG registered only once if NT-proBNP<125ng/L, whereas if NT-proBNP≥125 ng/L participants underwent prolonged screening, recording single-lead ECGs four times daily for two weeks. If atrial fibrillation was detected, treatment was initiated. Baseline and outcome data were collected from Swedish National Registries. <b>Results:</b> In total 28,712 individuals were randomized, after exclusion of death and emigration 13,905 remained in the intervention group, 13,884 in the control group. Participation rate in the intervention group was 49.2% (6,843/13,905). Participants in the high NT-proBNP group (NT-proBNP≥125 ng/L) without prior atrial fibrillation constituted 60% of the total and underwent prolonged screening. New AF was detected in 2.4% (165/6,843) in the intervention group. There was no difference in AF prevalence or oral anticoagulant treatment between the intervention and the control group after five years follow-up. After a median of 5.1 years (IQR 5.0-5.8) there was no difference in the primary outcome of stroke or systemic embolism between the intervention group and the control group, HR: 0.96 (95% CI 0.86-1.06). The low NT-proBNP-group had significantly fewer strokes or systemic emboli than the control group, HR: 0.59 (95% CI 0.46-0.74), p<0.001. In the high NT-proBNP group the risk of stroke or systemic embolism was higher compared to the low NT-proBNP group, HR: 1.57 (95% CI 1.22-2.02), p=0.001. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this population-based screening trial for atrial fibrillation using NT-proBNP for screening enhancement, there was no difference in risk of stroke or systemic embolism for the intervention group compared to controls. Participation was moderate. The use of NT-proBNP for screening enhancement was safe in identifying low-risk participants. <b>Clinical Trial Registration:</b> www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02743416.</p>","PeriodicalId":10331,"journal":{"name":"Circulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":35.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071176","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Guidelines have suggested screening for atrial fibrillation to enable early treatment and avoid downstream negative clinical events. We aimed to determine if atrial fibrillation screening potentially enhanced by NT-proBNP would reduce stroke or systemic embolism incidence as compared to in a control group and to determine if it was safe for those with low NT-proBNP concentrations to forfeit prolonged screening. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial all 75/76-year-old individuals in Stockholm Region, Sweden were randomized 1:1 to be invited to screening or serve as a control group. NT-proBNP concentration were measured and a single-lead-ECG registered only once if NT-proBNP<125ng/L, whereas if NT-proBNP≥125 ng/L participants underwent prolonged screening, recording single-lead ECGs four times daily for two weeks. If atrial fibrillation was detected, treatment was initiated. Baseline and outcome data were collected from Swedish National Registries. Results: In total 28,712 individuals were randomized, after exclusion of death and emigration 13,905 remained in the intervention group, 13,884 in the control group. Participation rate in the intervention group was 49.2% (6,843/13,905). Participants in the high NT-proBNP group (NT-proBNP≥125 ng/L) without prior atrial fibrillation constituted 60% of the total and underwent prolonged screening. New AF was detected in 2.4% (165/6,843) in the intervention group. There was no difference in AF prevalence or oral anticoagulant treatment between the intervention and the control group after five years follow-up. After a median of 5.1 years (IQR 5.0-5.8) there was no difference in the primary outcome of stroke or systemic embolism between the intervention group and the control group, HR: 0.96 (95% CI 0.86-1.06). The low NT-proBNP-group had significantly fewer strokes or systemic emboli than the control group, HR: 0.59 (95% CI 0.46-0.74), p<0.001. In the high NT-proBNP group the risk of stroke or systemic embolism was higher compared to the low NT-proBNP group, HR: 1.57 (95% CI 1.22-2.02), p=0.001. Conclusions: In this population-based screening trial for atrial fibrillation using NT-proBNP for screening enhancement, there was no difference in risk of stroke or systemic embolism for the intervention group compared to controls. Participation was moderate. The use of NT-proBNP for screening enhancement was safe in identifying low-risk participants. Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02743416.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为检测心房颤动而对 75 岁老年人进行系统性 NT-proBNP 和心电图筛查的随机邀请 -STROKESTOP II。
背景:指南建议对心房颤动进行筛查,以便及早治疗并避免下游负面临床事件的发生。我们旨在确定,与对照组相比,NT-proBNP 可增强心房颤动筛查,从而降低中风或全身性栓塞的发生率,并确定 NT-proBNP 浓度低的患者放弃延长筛查是否安全。方法:在这项随机对照试验中,瑞典斯德哥尔摩地区所有 75/76 岁的老人按 1:1 的比例被随机邀请参加筛查或作为对照组。如果NT-proBNPR结果为阳性,则只测量一次NT-proBNP浓度并登记一次单导联心电图:共有 28,712 人被随机纳入干预组,排除死亡和移民后,13,905 人留在干预组,13,884 人留在对照组。干预组的参与率为 49.2%(6843/13905)。既往无心房颤动的高 NT-proBNP 组(NT-proBNP≥125 纳克/升)参与者占总人数的 60%,他们接受了长时间的筛查。干预组中有 2.4%(165/6,843)的人发现了新的房颤。五年随访后,干预组和对照组在房颤患病率或口服抗凝药治疗方面没有差异。中位随访 5.1 年(IQR 5.0-5.8)后,干预组与对照组在中风或全身性栓塞这一主要结局上没有差异,HR:0.96(95% CI 0.86-1.06)。低 NT-proBNP 组的中风或全身性栓塞发生率明显低于对照组,HR:0.59(95% CI 0.46-0.74),P 结论:在这项基于人群的心房颤动筛查试验中,使用 NT-proBNP 增强筛查效果,与对照组相比,干预组的中风或全身性栓塞风险没有差异。参与度适中。使用NT-proBNP进行筛查增强在识别低风险参与者方面是安全的。临床试验注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov;NCT02743416。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation
Circulation 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
45.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
1473
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Circulation is a platform that publishes a diverse range of content related to cardiovascular health and disease. This includes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other contributions spanning observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services, outcomes studies, and advancements in basic and translational research. The journal serves as a vital resource for professionals and researchers in the field of cardiovascular health, providing a comprehensive platform for disseminating knowledge and fostering advancements in the understanding and management of cardiovascular issues.
期刊最新文献
Associations of "Weekend Warrior" Physical Activity With Incident Disease and Cardiometabolic Health. Performance and Safety of the Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Through Long-Term Follow-Up: Final Results From the Pivotal Study. Sacubitril/Valsartan in Pediatric Heart Failure (PANORAMA-HF): A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind Trial. Effect of Delayed Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Acute Kidney Injury and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Bone Morphogenetic Protein 9 Protects Against Myocardial Infarction by Improving Lymphatic Drainage Function and Triggering DECR1-Mediated Mitochondrial Bioenergetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1