Feasibility of a deep-inspiration breath-hold [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 PET/CT imaging on upper-abdominal lesions in NET patients: in comparison with respiratory-gated PET/CT.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING EJNMMI Physics Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1186/s40658-024-00677-5
Haiqiong Zhang, Meixi Liu, Ximin Shi, Jiangyu Ma, Chao Ren, Zhenghai Huang, Ying Wang, Hongli Jing, Li Huo
{"title":"Feasibility of a deep-inspiration breath-hold [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 PET/CT imaging on upper-abdominal lesions in NET patients: in comparison with respiratory-gated PET/CT.","authors":"Haiqiong Zhang, Meixi Liu, Ximin Shi, Jiangyu Ma, Chao Ren, Zhenghai Huang, Ying Wang, Hongli Jing, Li Huo","doi":"10.1186/s40658-024-00677-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purposes: </strong>To explore the clinical feasibility and efficacy of a deep inspiration breath-hold (BH) PET/CT using [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 on upper abdominal lesions in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three patients underwent a free-breath (FB) whole-body PET/CT, including a 10 min/bed scan for the upper abdomen with a vital signal monitoring for respiratory gating (RG) followed by a 20-second BH PET/CT covering the same axial range. For the upper abdomen bed, the following PET series was reconstructed: a 2-min FB PET; RG PET (6 bins); a 20-second and 15-second BH PET (BH_15 and BH_20). Semi-quantitative analysis was performed to compare liver SUV<sub>mean</sub>, lesion SUV<sub>max</sub>, MTV, its percentage difference and target-to-background ratio (TBR) between both BH PET and RG PET images. Subgroup analysis considered lesion location, MTV and SUV<sub>max</sub>. A 5-point Likert scale was used to perform visual analysis and any missed or additional lesions were identified compared with RG PET.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative analysis on overall lesions (n = 78) revealed higher SUV<sub>max</sub> and TBR, and smaller MTV for both BH PET compared to FB and RG PET, with lesion location-specific variations. Neither significant difference was observed in all metrics between RG and FB PET in larger lesions, nor in MTV in lower-uptake lesions. However, both BH PET significantly enhanced these measurements. In the visual analysis, both BH PET showed noninferior performance to RG PET, and were evaluated clinically acceptable. Additional and missed lesions were observed in FB and both BH PET compared with RG PET, but didn't alter the clinical management. The BH_15 PET showed comparable performance to BH_20 PET in any comparison.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BH PET/CT using [<sup>18</sup>F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 is effective in detecting upper abdominal lesions, offering more accurate quantitative measurements. Using a novel PET/CT scanner, a 15-second BH PET can provide comparable and superior performance to RG PET, indicating potential feasibility in clinical routines.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"11 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00677-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purposes: To explore the clinical feasibility and efficacy of a deep inspiration breath-hold (BH) PET/CT using [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 on upper abdominal lesions in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

Methods: Twenty-three patients underwent a free-breath (FB) whole-body PET/CT, including a 10 min/bed scan for the upper abdomen with a vital signal monitoring for respiratory gating (RG) followed by a 20-second BH PET/CT covering the same axial range. For the upper abdomen bed, the following PET series was reconstructed: a 2-min FB PET; RG PET (6 bins); a 20-second and 15-second BH PET (BH_15 and BH_20). Semi-quantitative analysis was performed to compare liver SUVmean, lesion SUVmax, MTV, its percentage difference and target-to-background ratio (TBR) between both BH PET and RG PET images. Subgroup analysis considered lesion location, MTV and SUVmax. A 5-point Likert scale was used to perform visual analysis and any missed or additional lesions were identified compared with RG PET.

Results: Quantitative analysis on overall lesions (n = 78) revealed higher SUVmax and TBR, and smaller MTV for both BH PET compared to FB and RG PET, with lesion location-specific variations. Neither significant difference was observed in all metrics between RG and FB PET in larger lesions, nor in MTV in lower-uptake lesions. However, both BH PET significantly enhanced these measurements. In the visual analysis, both BH PET showed noninferior performance to RG PET, and were evaluated clinically acceptable. Additional and missed lesions were observed in FB and both BH PET compared with RG PET, but didn't alter the clinical management. The BH_15 PET showed comparable performance to BH_20 PET in any comparison.

Conclusion: The BH PET/CT using [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 is effective in detecting upper abdominal lesions, offering more accurate quantitative measurements. Using a novel PET/CT scanner, a 15-second BH PET can provide comparable and superior performance to RG PET, indicating potential feasibility in clinical routines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 NET 患者上腹部病变进行深吸气屏气 [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 PET/CT 成像的可行性:与呼吸门控 PET/CT 的比较。
目的探讨使用[18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3对神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)患者上腹部病变进行深吸气屏气(BH)PET/CT检查的临床可行性和有效性:23名患者接受了自由呼吸(FB)全身PET/CT检查,包括对上腹部进行10分钟/床的扫描,并对呼吸门控(RG)进行生命信号监测,然后进行20秒钟的BH PET/CT扫描,覆盖相同的轴向范围。对于上腹部病床,重建了以下 PET 系列:2 分钟 FB PET;RG PET(6 个分区);20 秒和 15 秒 BH PET(BH_15 和 BH_20)。对 BH PET 和 RG PET 图像进行半定量分析,比较肝脏 SUVmean、病变 SUVmax、MTV 及其百分比差异和靶-背景比(TBR)。亚组分析考虑了病变位置、MTV 和 SUVmax。采用 5 点李克特量表进行视觉分析,并与 RG PET 进行比较,找出任何遗漏或额外病灶:对总体病灶(n = 78)的定量分析显示,与 FB 和 RG PET 相比,BH PET 的 SUVmax 和 TBR 较高,而 MTV 较小,病灶位置存在特异性差异。在较大的病变中,RG 和 FB PET 的所有指标均无明显差异,在低摄取病变中,MTV 也无明显差异。不过,两种 BH PET 都能显著增强这些测量指标。在视觉分析中,两种 BH PET 的性能均不逊于 RG PET,临床评估结果可以接受。与RG PET相比,FB和两种BH PET都能观察到额外的和漏检的病灶,但不会改变临床治疗。在任何比较中,BH_15 PET 的性能都与 BH_20 PET 相当:结论:使用[18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3的BH PET/CT能有效检测上腹部病变,提供更准确的定量测量。使用新型 PET/CT 扫描仪,15 秒的 BH PET 可提供与 RG PET 相媲美甚至更优越的性能,这表明它在临床常规检查中具有潜在的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EJNMMI Physics
EJNMMI Physics Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.
期刊最新文献
Phantom-based investigation of block sequential regularised expectation maximisation (BSREM) reconstruction for zirconium-89 PET-CT for varied count levels. Validation of a data-driven motion-compensated PET brain image reconstruction algorithm in clinical patients using four radiotracers. A review of state-of-the-art resolution improvement techniques in SPECT imaging. Count-rate management in 131I SPECT/CT calibration. Correction: Radiopharmacokinetic modelling and radiation dose assessment of 223Ra used for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1