Impact of taxanes after PD-1 blockade exposure in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Esophagus Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1007/s10388-024-01085-5
Kazuhiro Shiraishi, Yuki Takeyasu, Shun Yamamoto, Kotoe Oshima, Hiroshi Imazeki, Hidekazu Hirano, Natsuko Okita, Hirokazu Shoji, Yoshitaka Honma, Satoru Iwasa, Atsuo Takasima, Ken Kato
{"title":"Impact of taxanes after PD-1 blockade exposure in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Kazuhiro Shiraishi, Yuki Takeyasu, Shun Yamamoto, Kotoe Oshima, Hiroshi Imazeki, Hidekazu Hirano, Natsuko Okita, Hirokazu Shoji, Yoshitaka Honma, Satoru Iwasa, Atsuo Takasima, Ken Kato","doi":"10.1007/s10388-024-01085-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade improves survival in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the efficacy of taxanes after exposure to PD-1 blockade remains unclear in patients with advanced ESCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of advanced ESCC patients treated with taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) with/without prior exposure to PD-1 blockade (Exposed /Naïve group) at National Cancer Center Hospital from June 2016 to December 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-nine patients (Exposed group, n = 32; Naïve group, n = 67) were included. The objective response rate (ORR) of the Exposed group was significantly higher than that of the Naïve group (37.5% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.009). The median progression-free survival was similar between the Exposed and Naïve groups (3.8 vs. 2.8 months, HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.65-1.86, p = 0.66). PD-1 blockade exposure independently predicated higher ORR to taxanes in multivariate analysis. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were comparable between the Exposed and Naïve groups (45.8% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Taxanes following PD-1 blockade in advanced ESCC showed a higher ORR but similar PFS compared to taxanes without prior PD-1 exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":11918,"journal":{"name":"Esophagus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-024-01085-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade improves survival in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the efficacy of taxanes after exposure to PD-1 blockade remains unclear in patients with advanced ESCC.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of advanced ESCC patients treated with taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) with/without prior exposure to PD-1 blockade (Exposed /Naïve group) at National Cancer Center Hospital from June 2016 to December 2020.

Results: Ninety-nine patients (Exposed group, n = 32; Naïve group, n = 67) were included. The objective response rate (ORR) of the Exposed group was significantly higher than that of the Naïve group (37.5% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.009). The median progression-free survival was similar between the Exposed and Naïve groups (3.8 vs. 2.8 months, HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.65-1.86, p = 0.66). PD-1 blockade exposure independently predicated higher ORR to taxanes in multivariate analysis. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were comparable between the Exposed and Naïve groups (45.8% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.64).

Conclusions: Taxanes following PD-1 blockade in advanced ESCC showed a higher ORR but similar PFS compared to taxanes without prior PD-1 exposure.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期食管鳞状细胞癌接触 PD-1 阻断剂后使用紫杉类药物的影响
背景:程序性细胞死亡-1(PD-1)阻断可提高晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的生存率。然而,晚期ESCC患者在接受PD-1阻断治疗后使用紫杉类药物的疗效仍不明确:我们回顾性分析了2016年6月至2020年12月期间国立癌症中心医院接受紫杉类药物(紫杉醇或多西他赛)治疗的晚期ESCC患者的临床结果,这些患者之前接受过/未接受过PD-1阻断剂治疗(暴露组/新药组):共纳入99名患者(暴露组,n = 32;新药组,n = 67)。暴露组的客观反应率(ORR)明显高于新药组(37.5% vs. 13.4%,P = 0.009)。暴露组和新药组的中位无进展生存期相似(3.8 个月 vs. 2.8 个月,HR 1.12,95% CI 0.65-1.86,p = 0.66)。在多变量分析中,PD-1阻断剂暴露可独立预测更高的紫杉类药物ORR。暴露组和新药组发生≥3级不良事件的比例相当(45.8% vs. 40.3%,p = 0.64):结论:在晚期ESCC中使用PD-1阻断后的紫杉类药物与未暴露PD-1的紫杉类药物相比,ORR更高,但PFS相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Esophagus
Esophagus GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Esophagus, the official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, introduces practitioners and researchers to significant studies in the fields of benign and malignant diseases of the esophagus. The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, and short articles including technical notes ( How I do it ), which will be peer-reviewed by the editorial board. Letters to the editor are also welcome. Special articles on esophageal diseases will be provided by the editorial board, and proceedings of symposia and workshops will be included in special issues for the Annual Congress of the Society.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Comparison of proton-based Definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery-based therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective Japanese cohort study. Outcomes of definitive carbon-ion radiotherapy for cT1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Comparison of proton-based definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery-based therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective Japanese cohort study. Two onset types of achalasia and the long-term course to diagnosis. Multicenter retrospective analysis of complications and risk factors in endoscopic resection for esophageal cancer across Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1