Esophagus最新文献

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is standard for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, though often ineffective. Therefore, predicting the response to chemotherapy before treatment is desirable. However, there is currently no established method for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to build a deep-learning model to predict the response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to preoperative chemotherapy by utilizing multimodal data integrating esophageal endoscopic images and clinical information.

Methods: 170 patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were retrospectively studied, and endoscopic images and clinical information before neoadjuvant chemotherapy were collected. Endoscopic images alone and endoscopic images plus clinical information were each analyzed with a deep-learning model based on ResNet50. The clinical information alone was analyzed using logistic regression machine learning models, and the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to compare the accuracy of each model. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping was used on the endoscopic images to analyze the trend of the regions of interest in this model.

Results: The area under the curve by clinical information alone, endoscopy alone, and both combined were 0.64, 0.55, and 0.77, respectively. The endoscopic image plus clinical information group was statistically more significant than the other models. This model focused more on the tumor when trained with clinical information.

Conclusions: The deep-learning model developed suggests that gastrointestinal endoscopic imaging, in combination with other clinical information, has the potential to predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma before treatment.

Background and purpose: It remains unclear whether the lymph-node ratio (LNR) is a relevant factor for the risk of recurrence following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF), which is a new standard of care for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Japan. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of LNR as a risk factor for recurrence.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 75 patients who underwent nCT-DCF followed by curative surgery for resectable ESCC. The cut-off for the LNR was determined using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis for recurrence.

Results: A higher LNR was observed in 34 (45.3%) patients. At a median follow-up of 19.2 months, the median disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was not reached in patients with a lower LNR and was 8.0 months in those with a higher LNR (P < 0.01). The estimated 1-year DFS/RFS rate was 47.8% and 100% for patients with a higher LNR and lower LNR, respectively. LNR remained a risk factor, even when stratified by non-pathological complete response, the presence of positive ypN, or ypStage III. In those with a higher LNR, the median DFS/RFS was 18.3 versus 8.0 months with and without adjuvant nivolumab treatment, respectively.

Conclusions: Higher LNR indicates a more aggressive phenotype with worse DFS/RFS rates and increased recurrence following nCT-DCF treatment and curative surgery for ESCC.

Background: Numerous studies have described positive relationships between hospital volume (HV) and clinical outcomes in highly complex procedures, including esophagectomies. Although the centralization of surgery has been considered a possible solution for improving clinical outcomes, the HV impact on perioperative healthcare costs is unknown. This study aimed to determine the relationship between HV and perioperative healthcare costs for patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Methods: This retrospective, nationwide cohort study used Japanese Administrative Claims Database data. Data on esophagectomies performed nationwide in 2015 were extracted. The outcome measure was perioperative healthcare costs per person from the perspective of the insurer. The healthcare costs in outpatient or inpatient settings of any hospital and clinic where patients received treatment were summed up from the month the surgery was performed to 3 months after. Linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the risk-adjusted effects of the HV category (1-4/5-9/10-14/15-) on perioperative costs.

Results: A total of 5232 patients underwent an esophagectomy at 584 hospitals. The overall perioperative cost was 20.834 billion Japanese yen (JPY). The median perioperative costs per person for each HV category (1-4/5-9/10-14/15-) were 3.728 (709 patients), 3.740 (658 patients), 3.760 (512 patients), and 3.760 (3253 patients) million JPY, respectively (P = 0.676). Multivariate analyses revealed that each HV category had no significant impact on perioperative costs.

Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the perioperative costs between high- and low-volume centers. Esophageal cancer surgery centralization may be achievable without increasing healthcare costs.

Background: Esophageal mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer can lead to postoperative esophageal stricture, with current preventive measures being insufficient. Sprayable wound dressings containing hydrophobized microparticles exhibit strong adhesion. This study aimed to investigate the preventive effects of hydrophobized microparticles on esophageal stenosis following endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Methods: Circumferential esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed on miniature swine (n = 6). Swine were categorized into two groups: those sprayed with hydrophobized microparticles (sprayed group) and those not sprayed (non-sprayed group). Hydrophobized microparticles were sprayed onto the sprayed group on Days 0, 3, and 7 of endoscopic submucosal dissection. The non-sprayed group underwent endoscopy on the same days. Esophageal stricture rate, submucosal inflammatory cell infiltration, submucosal fibrosis, and thickening of the muscular layer were compared between the groups on Day 14 of endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Results: Spraying of hydrophobized microparticles was easily performed using an existing endoscopic spraying device. The esophageal stricture rate was significantly lower in the sprayed group than in the non-sprayed group (76.1% versus 90.6%, p < 0.05). The sprayed group showed suppression of inflammatory cell infiltration in the submucosal layer (p < 0.01) and thickening of the muscular layer (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Sprayable tissue-adhesive hydrophobized microparticles reduce the stricture rate after esophageal ESD by inhibiting inflammatory cell infiltration, submucosal fibrosis, and thickening of the muscular layer. The use of hydrophobized microparticles for preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection esophageal stenosis offers a promising avenue for clinical applications in endoscopic procedures, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Background: An "esophageal rosette" (ER) sign is one of the endoscopic findings in primary esophageal achalasia. We investigated whether ER was associated with the therapeutic efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Methods: The clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes of POEM were retrospectively evaluated in 69 patients who underwent the procedure for esophageal achalasia. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of an ER sign (ER and non-ER groups). Clinical success was defined as the post-POEM Eckardt score of three or less.

Results: On preoperative endoscopy, 55 (79.7%) patients exhibited ER. The patients in the ER group had a longer disease duration than those in the non-ER group (7.4 vs. 2.7 years, P = 0.0011), although the Eckardt scores before POEM were similar between the two groups. No differences were observed in POEM outcomes between the two groups, including procedure time, length of myotomy, hospital stay, and adverse events. The clinical success of POEM was more frequent in the ER group than in the non-ER group (96.2% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.027). Although the changes in the total Eckardt score and integrated relaxation pressure did not differ between the two groups, dysphagia in the Eckardt score significantly improved in the ER group.

Conclusions: The data suggest that POEM for esophageal achalasia with ER could lead to favorable therapeutic outcomes, particularly dysphagia. The presence of ER may help determine the optimal treatment for esophageal achalasia.

Background: The practice of endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) often diverges from evidence-based standards due to various factors, including inadequate dissemination of evidence or a mismatch between evidence and real-world contexts. This survey aimed to identify discrepancies between evidence-based standard practices and community standard practices for ESCC among endoscopists.

Methods: An online survey targeting endoscopists who perform upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at least weekly was conducted to collect data on clinical practices related to ESCC diagnosis. The survey, comprising 20 questions, was disseminated through multiple professional networks. Descriptive statistical analysis and logistic regression were performed to analyze the data.

Results: Data from 819 endoscopists were included in the analyses. Notably, a significant proportion employed narrow-band imaging/blue-laser imaging over iodine staining, and preferences varied based on risk assessment for ESCC. In total, 64.0% of endoscopists primarily used iodine solution at a concentration of 1% or less, while 96.5% of endoscopists performed an observation of the oral cavity and the pharynx when conducting upper gastrointestinal endoscopies on individuals at high risk of ESCC. The surveillance interval for metachronous multiple ESCCs was most commonly every 6 months, followed by every 12 months. In addition, most physicians conducted surveillance of metastatic recurrence at 6-month intervals.

Conclusions: This survey highlights significant gaps between evidence-based and community standard practices in the endoscopic diagnosis of ESCC. These findings underscore the need for enhanced dissemination of evidence-based guidelines and consideration of real-world clinical contexts to bridge these gaps and optimize patient care.

Background: Osteosarcopenia, recognized as a consequence of aging, has garnered attention as a prognostic marker in recent years; however, its clinical significance in esophageal cancer remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the impact of osteosarcopenia on esophageal cancer surgery outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with advanced esophageal cancer who underwent surgical resection between 2018 and 2021. Skeletal muscle index at the L3 vertebral level and bone density at the Th11 vertebral level were measured on preoperative computed tomography scans. Based on the findings, we divided patients into sarcopenia, osteopenia, and osteosarcopenia groups, and analyzed the relationship between osteosarcopenia and clinicopathological factors, including prognosis.

Results: Of the 124 patients included, 59 (48%) were diagnosed with osteosarcopenia. Among all, 46 (37%) patients experienced postoperative recurrence, and a significant correlation was observed between osteosarcopenia and recurrence (p < 0.05). Overall survival and relapse-free survival were significantly shorter in the osteosarcopenia group than in the non-osteosarcopenia group (p < 0.05 for both). In a subgroup analysis, overall survival and relapse-free survival were significantly shorter in the osteosarcopenia group than in the non-osteosarcopenia group, or in the sarcopenia and osteopenia alone groups (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The presence of preoperative osteosarcopenia was found to affect the prognosis following esophageal cancer surgery.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a prevalent form of esophageal cancer with a poor prognosis despite advances in treatment. Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has shown potential in enhancing treatment efficacy. We conducted a comprehensive review of clinical trials published between 2019 and 2024, sourced from PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases. Studies included were prospective phase II trials that evaluated the combination of ICIs with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in resectable locally advanced ESCC. Ten trials met the inclusion criteria. The review highlights various approaches in combining ICIs with CRT, including concurrent, induction, and consolidation therapy. Among the included trials, a significant proportion focused on concurrently administering ICIs with CRT, showing promising outcomes with high pathological complete response rates (pCR) and manageable toxicities. However, further research is needed to validate the efficacy of induction and consolidation therapies and determine optimal treatment protocols. The combination of ICIs and nCRT can potentially improve treatment responses and outcomes for patients with locally advanced ESCC. Despite recent encouraging findings, most trials were single-arm with small sample sizes, indicating the need for larger studies with longer follow-ups to assess survival outcomes comprehensively.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment procedures. We speculated that during the COVID-19 pandemic, sufficient medical resources were maintained in board-certified hospitals, resulting in favorable short-term outcomes, whereas hospital functions in non-board-certified hospitals declined, leading to mortality increase. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on short-term outcomes after esophagectomy, based on the scale of the facilities.

Methods: Data of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between January 2018 and December 2022 were analyzed using the National Clinical Database (NCD) of Japan. We selected the Authorized Institutes for Board-certified Esophageal Surgeons (AIBCESs) certified by the Japan Esophageal Society (JES) at the hospital level for evaluating the difference in outcomes between institutions. Operative mortality rates and other morbidities were evaluated using the standardized mortality and morbidity ratio (SMR, the ratio of the number of observed patients to the expected number of patients).

Results: Within the study period, the annual mean operative mortality rate was higher in non-AIBCESs than in AIBCESs. The SMR showed no significant difference after the COVID-19 pandemic in non-AIBCES for mortality, as well as that in AIBCES.

Conclusions: In non-AIBCESs, no worsening of results caused by the COVID-19 pandemic was observed despite the shortage of medical resources. Our findings highlighted the high quality of esophageal surgery in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic, a critical situation with limited medical resources.