Psychometrics of the modified family-centered care assessment short version for childhood obesity.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1186/s12955-024-02284-5
Meg Simione, Paola Ferreira, Man Luo, Clarissa Hoover, Meghan Perkins, Lauren Fiechtner, Elsie M Taveras
{"title":"Psychometrics of the modified family-centered care assessment short version for childhood obesity.","authors":"Meg Simione, Paola Ferreira, Man Luo, Clarissa Hoover, Meghan Perkins, Lauren Fiechtner, Elsie M Taveras","doi":"10.1186/s12955-024-02284-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incorporating principles of family-centered care into pediatric weight management interventions can improve the effectiveness and quality of treatment and reduce attrition rates. To assess the family-centeredness of interventions, reliable, valid, and easy-to-administer scales are needed. The purpose of the study was to develop a shortened version of the modified Family Centered Care Assessment (mFCCA) and assess its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The mFCCA, a scale to assess the family-centeredness of interventions for childhood obesity, was administered to families following the Connect for Health randomized control trial evaluating the effectiveness of a primary care-based pediatric weight management intervention. We iteratively removed items from the mFCCA and used Rasch modeling to examine the reliability and validity of the shortened scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included data from 318 parents and the exploratory factor analysis showed the presence of a single factor. The results of the Rasch modeling demonstrated acceptable internal consistency of the scale (0.7) and strong validity as evidenced by the overall model fit and range of item difficulty. Following the psychometric analyses, we reduced the number of items from 24 to 8 items.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mFCCA short version demonstrates good psychometrics and can be used to evaluate the family-centeredness of childhood obesity interventions with reduced participant burden, thereby improving outcomes for children with obesity.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02124460 registered on April 24, 2014.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-024-02284-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Incorporating principles of family-centered care into pediatric weight management interventions can improve the effectiveness and quality of treatment and reduce attrition rates. To assess the family-centeredness of interventions, reliable, valid, and easy-to-administer scales are needed. The purpose of the study was to develop a shortened version of the modified Family Centered Care Assessment (mFCCA) and assess its psychometric properties.

Methods: The mFCCA, a scale to assess the family-centeredness of interventions for childhood obesity, was administered to families following the Connect for Health randomized control trial evaluating the effectiveness of a primary care-based pediatric weight management intervention. We iteratively removed items from the mFCCA and used Rasch modeling to examine the reliability and validity of the shortened scale.

Results: We included data from 318 parents and the exploratory factor analysis showed the presence of a single factor. The results of the Rasch modeling demonstrated acceptable internal consistency of the scale (0.7) and strong validity as evidenced by the overall model fit and range of item difficulty. Following the psychometric analyses, we reduced the number of items from 24 to 8 items.

Conclusion: The mFCCA short version demonstrates good psychometrics and can be used to evaluate the family-centeredness of childhood obesity interventions with reduced participant burden, thereby improving outcomes for children with obesity.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02124460 registered on April 24, 2014.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童肥胖症 "以家庭为中心的护理评估 "简易修订版的心理计量学。
背景:将以家庭为中心的护理原则纳入儿科体重管理干预措施中,可以提高治疗效果和质量,降低减员率。要评估干预措施是否以家庭为中心,需要可靠、有效且易于使用的量表。本研究的目的是开发一个简易版的 "以家庭为中心的护理评估"(mFCCA),并评估其心理测量特性:mFCCA是一种用于评估儿童肥胖症干预措施是否以家庭为中心的量表,在 "健康连接 "随机对照试验后对家庭进行了测试,该试验评估了以初级保健为基础的儿科体重管理干预措施的有效性。我们反复删除了 mFCCA 中的项目,并使用 Rasch 模型检验了缩短后量表的信度和效度:结果:我们纳入了 318 名家长的数据,探索性因子分析显示存在一个单一因子。Rasch 模型的结果表明,量表的内部一致性(0.7)是可以接受的,而且从整个模型的拟合度和项目难度范围来看,量表具有很强的有效性。在心理测量分析之后,我们将项目数量从 24 个减少到 8 个:mFCCA简版具有良好的心理测量学特性,可用于评估儿童肥胖干预措施是否以家庭为中心,同时减轻参与者的负担,从而改善肥胖儿童的治疗效果:试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02124460于2014年4月24日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1