Identification of risk factors for adverse drug events in a general hospital.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal for Quality in Health Care Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzae088
Leticia Mara Pisetta, Fernanda Zanardo Tonin, Fernando Kenji Akiyoshi, Fábio André Santos, Daniel Fernandes
{"title":"Identification of risk factors for adverse drug events in a general hospital.","authors":"Leticia Mara Pisetta, Fernanda Zanardo Tonin, Fernando Kenji Akiyoshi, Fábio André Santos, Daniel Fernandes","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzae088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adverse events (AEs), and particularly adverse drug events (ADEs), represent a health problem as they can cause permanent damage or death. Understanding the frequency, location, and causes of ADEs can prevent harm to patients. The Global Trigger Tool, produced by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (GTT/IHI), is widely used to identify AEs. Recognizing the profile of patients who suffer ADEs can reveal clinical or individual characteristics that predispose to the occurrence of AEs. A cross-sectional study was carried out through a retrospective analysis of 120 medical charts of patients discharged from hospital between October 2020 and April 2021. Patients over 18 years old, with a length of stay of more than 24 h, were included. The list of triggers used was from the medication module of the GTT/IHI, which was adapted for use in the institution. Two primary reviewers and a medical reviewer applied this tool. The primary reviewers independently assessed the randomized charts. A meeting to achieve consensus among the reviewers was held every 2 weeks to validate the identified ADEs; classifications were based on harm severity. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to assess the variables that predicted the occurrence of ADEs, using the backward stepwise method. A total of 43 ADEs were identified, with a frequency of 36 per 100 admissions (43/120). Of these, five ADEs (12%) were responsible for patients being admitted to hospital. In the case of in-hospital ADEs, there were 42.2 per 1000 patients/day. The clinical manifestation of altered kidney function (16%) and the anatomical drug group of the nervous system (33%) were the most frequent ADEs. The multivariate logistic regression model was significant (×2 = 44.960, P < .001), indicating that factors such as: known drug allergy [odds ratio 5.728; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.249, 26.274, P = .025]; being clinically hospitalized (odds ratio 7.504; 95% CI: 1.654, 34.037; P = .009); number of medicines used (odds ratio 1.100; 95% CI: 1.054, 1.148; P < .001); and being under the care of internal medicine (odds ratio 3.633; 95% CI: 1.257, 10.511; P = .017) were predictor variables associated with the occurrence of ADEs. A significant percentage of hospitalized patients experienced at least one ADE, with rates surpassing those found in similar studies. The GTT/IHI effectively assessed medication-related harm, emphasizing the need for tailored triggers based on population characteristics. Predictor variables can inform preventive strategies. Overall, the tool facilitated a localized risk assessment of medication use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzae088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adverse events (AEs), and particularly adverse drug events (ADEs), represent a health problem as they can cause permanent damage or death. Understanding the frequency, location, and causes of ADEs can prevent harm to patients. The Global Trigger Tool, produced by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (GTT/IHI), is widely used to identify AEs. Recognizing the profile of patients who suffer ADEs can reveal clinical or individual characteristics that predispose to the occurrence of AEs. A cross-sectional study was carried out through a retrospective analysis of 120 medical charts of patients discharged from hospital between October 2020 and April 2021. Patients over 18 years old, with a length of stay of more than 24 h, were included. The list of triggers used was from the medication module of the GTT/IHI, which was adapted for use in the institution. Two primary reviewers and a medical reviewer applied this tool. The primary reviewers independently assessed the randomized charts. A meeting to achieve consensus among the reviewers was held every 2 weeks to validate the identified ADEs; classifications were based on harm severity. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to assess the variables that predicted the occurrence of ADEs, using the backward stepwise method. A total of 43 ADEs were identified, with a frequency of 36 per 100 admissions (43/120). Of these, five ADEs (12%) were responsible for patients being admitted to hospital. In the case of in-hospital ADEs, there were 42.2 per 1000 patients/day. The clinical manifestation of altered kidney function (16%) and the anatomical drug group of the nervous system (33%) were the most frequent ADEs. The multivariate logistic regression model was significant (×2 = 44.960, P < .001), indicating that factors such as: known drug allergy [odds ratio 5.728; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.249, 26.274, P = .025]; being clinically hospitalized (odds ratio 7.504; 95% CI: 1.654, 34.037; P = .009); number of medicines used (odds ratio 1.100; 95% CI: 1.054, 1.148; P < .001); and being under the care of internal medicine (odds ratio 3.633; 95% CI: 1.257, 10.511; P = .017) were predictor variables associated with the occurrence of ADEs. A significant percentage of hospitalized patients experienced at least one ADE, with rates surpassing those found in similar studies. The GTT/IHI effectively assessed medication-related harm, emphasizing the need for tailored triggers based on population characteristics. Predictor variables can inform preventive strategies. Overall, the tool facilitated a localized risk assessment of medication use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别综合医院药物不良事件的风险因素。
导言:不良事件(AEs),尤其是药物不良事件(ADEs)是一个健康问题,因为它们可能造成永久性伤害或死亡。了解 ADE 发生的频率、地点和原因可以避免对患者造成伤害。医疗保健改进研究所(GTT/IHI)开发的 "全球触发工具"(Global Trigger Tool)被广泛用于识别药物不良事件。了解 ADEs 患者的特征可以揭示容易发生 AEs 的临床或个体特征:通过对 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 4 月期间出院的 120 名患者的病历进行回顾性分析,开展了一项横断面研究。研究对象包括 18 岁以上、住院时间超过 24 小时的患者。所使用的触发因素列表来自 GTT/IHI 的药物模块,该模块经调整后用于该机构。两名初审者和一名医学审查员使用了这一工具。初审者独立评估随机病历。审阅者每两周召开一次会议以达成共识,从而验证已确定的 ADE;根据伤害严重程度进行分类。采用逆向逐步法,利用多变量逻辑回归评估预测 ADE 发生的变量:共发现 43 例 ADE,发生频率为每 100 例住院病人中有 36 例 ADE(43/120)。其中,5 例 ADE(12%)导致患者入院治疗。就院内 ADE 而言,每千名患者每天发生 42.2 例。肾功能改变的临床表现(16%)和神经系统解剖药物组(33%)是最常见的 ADE。多变量逻辑回归模型具有显著性(x2 = 44.960,P < 0.001),表明以下因素:已知药物过敏(几率比 5.728;95% CI:1.249,26.274,P = 0.025);临床住院(几率比 7.504;95% CI:1.654,34.037;P = 0.009);使用药物的数量(几率比1.100;95% CI:1.054,1.148;P < 0.001);由内科医生护理(几率比3.633;95% CI:1.257,10.511;P = 0.017)是与ADEs发生相关的预测变量:结论:相当大比例的住院患者至少发生过一次ADE,其发生率超过了类似研究的结果。GTT/IHI有效评估了药物相关伤害,强调了根据人群特征定制触发器的必要性。预测变量可为预防策略提供依据。总体而言,该工具有助于对用药情况进行局部风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
Addressing the Continuing Challenges of Developing and Implementing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Diagnostic performance of a newly launched Canadian fast-track ultrasound clinic by rheumatologists for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Exploring the Development of Safety Culture among Physicians with Text Mining of Patient Safety Reports: A Retrospective Study. Optimizing Neurosurgery Clinic Operations: A Comparative Study of Interventions in Finland's Public Healthcare System. Setting Standards in Residential Aged Care: Identifying Achievable Benchmarks of Care for Long-term Aged Care Services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1