End Point Surrogacy in First-Line Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1200/JCO.24.01192
Florian Simon, Rudy Ligtvoet, Sandra Robrecht, Paula Cramer, Nadine Kutsch, Moritz Fürstenau, Valentin Goede, Julia von Tresckow, Petra Langerbeins, Anna-Maria Fink, Henriette Huber, Eugen Tausch, Christof Schneider, Clemens M Wendtner, Matthias Ritgen, Martin Dreyling, Lothar Müller, Lutz Jacobasch, Werner J Heinz, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Liliya Sivcheva, Sebastian Böttcher, Peter Dreger, Thomas Illmer, Michael Gregor, Philipp B Staber, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Carsten U Niemann, Arnon P Kater, Kirsten Fischer, Barbara Eichhorst, Michael Hallek, Othman Al-Sawaf
{"title":"End Point Surrogacy in First-Line Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.","authors":"Florian Simon, Rudy Ligtvoet, Sandra Robrecht, Paula Cramer, Nadine Kutsch, Moritz Fürstenau, Valentin Goede, Julia von Tresckow, Petra Langerbeins, Anna-Maria Fink, Henriette Huber, Eugen Tausch, Christof Schneider, Clemens M Wendtner, Matthias Ritgen, Martin Dreyling, Lothar Müller, Lutz Jacobasch, Werner J Heinz, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Liliya Sivcheva, Sebastian Böttcher, Peter Dreger, Thomas Illmer, Michael Gregor, Philipp B Staber, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Carsten U Niemann, Arnon P Kater, Kirsten Fischer, Barbara Eichhorst, Michael Hallek, Othman Al-Sawaf","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.01192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Surrogate end points are commonly used to estimate treatment efficacy in clinical studies of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This patient- and trial-level analysis describes the correlation between progression-free survival (PFS) and minimal residual disease (MRD) with overall survival (OS) in first-line trials for CLL.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>First, patient-level correlation was confirmed using source data from 12 frontline German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG)-trials. Additionally, a joint-frailty copula model was fitted to validate correlation in the setting of targeted therapies (TT). Second, a meta-analysis of first-line phase III trials in CLL from 2008 to 2024 was performed. Treatment effect correlation was quantified from seven GCLLSG and nine published trials, using hazard ratios (HRs) for time-to-event and odds ratios for binary end points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GCLLSG analysis set comprised 4,237 patients. Patient-level correlation for PFS/OS was strong with Spearman Rho >0.9. The joint-frailty copula indicated a weak correlation for chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy (C/CIT) with a tau of 0.52 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.55) while the correlation was strong for TT (tau, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.89 to 0.93). The meta-analysis set contained a total of 8,065 patients including 5,198 (64%) patients treated with C/CIT and 2,867 (36%) treated with TT. Treatment-effect correlation of the HRs for PFS and OS was <i>R</i> = 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.76, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.56) while correlation of end-of-treatment MRD with PFS and OS was <i>R</i> = 0.88 (95% CI, -0.87 to 0.89; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.78) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.73; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.5), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient-level correlation was confirmed in the setting of TTs while treatment-effect correlation between PFS and OS remains uncertain. MRD response status showed a high treatment-effect correlation with PFS but not OS, with the caveat of a limited number of randomized trials with available MRD data.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.01192","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Surrogate end points are commonly used to estimate treatment efficacy in clinical studies of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This patient- and trial-level analysis describes the correlation between progression-free survival (PFS) and minimal residual disease (MRD) with overall survival (OS) in first-line trials for CLL.

Patients and methods: First, patient-level correlation was confirmed using source data from 12 frontline German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG)-trials. Additionally, a joint-frailty copula model was fitted to validate correlation in the setting of targeted therapies (TT). Second, a meta-analysis of first-line phase III trials in CLL from 2008 to 2024 was performed. Treatment effect correlation was quantified from seven GCLLSG and nine published trials, using hazard ratios (HRs) for time-to-event and odds ratios for binary end points.

Results: The GCLLSG analysis set comprised 4,237 patients. Patient-level correlation for PFS/OS was strong with Spearman Rho >0.9. The joint-frailty copula indicated a weak correlation for chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy (C/CIT) with a tau of 0.52 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.55) while the correlation was strong for TT (tau, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.89 to 0.93). The meta-analysis set contained a total of 8,065 patients including 5,198 (64%) patients treated with C/CIT and 2,867 (36%) treated with TT. Treatment-effect correlation of the HRs for PFS and OS was R = 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.76, R2 = 0.56) while correlation of end-of-treatment MRD with PFS and OS was R = 0.88 (95% CI, -0.87 to 0.89; R2 = 0.78) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.73; R2 = 0.5), respectively.

Conclusion: Patient-level correlation was confirmed in the setting of TTs while treatment-effect correlation between PFS and OS remains uncertain. MRD response status showed a high treatment-effect correlation with PFS but not OS, with the caveat of a limited number of randomized trials with available MRD data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一线慢性淋巴细胞白血病的终点代偿研究
目的:在慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的临床研究中,代用终点常用于估计治疗效果。这项患者和试验层面的分析描述了CLL一线试验中无进展生存期(PFS)和最小残留病(MRD)与总生存期(OS)之间的相关性:首先,利用12项GCLLSG一线试验的源数据确认了患者层面的相关性。其次,对2008-2024年CLL一线III期试验进行了荟萃分析。采用时间到事件的危险比和二元终点的几率比,对七项GCLLSG试验和九项已发表试验的治疗效果相关性进行了量化:GCLLSG分析集包括4237名患者。PFS/OS的患者水平相关性很强,Spearman's Rho大于0.9。联合虚弱协方差表明,C/CIT 的相关性较弱,tau 值为 0.52(95% CI:0.49 - 0.55),而 TT 的相关性较强(tau = 0.91,95% CI:0.89 - 0.93)。PFS和OS的危险比(HR)的治疗效果相关性为R = 0.75 (95%CI: 0.74 - 0.76, R2 = 0.56),而治疗末MRD与PFS和OS的相关性分别为R = 0.88 (95%CI: -0.87 - 0.89; R2 = 0.78)和0.71 (95%CI: 0.69 - 0.73; R2 = 0.5):患者层面的相关性在靶向治疗中得到了证实,而PFS和OS之间的治疗效果相关性仍不确定。MRD反应状态与PFS的治疗效果相关性较高,但与OS的相关性不高,但需要注意的是,可获得MRD数据的随机试验数量有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Study Report and Individual Participant Data Transparency for US Food and Drug Administration-Approved Anticancer Drugs: A Call for Systematic Data Availability. Stockholm3 in a Multiethnic Cohort for Prostate Cancer Detection (SEPTA): A Prospective Multicentered Trial. Prospective Study of Supplemental Screening With Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in Women With Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer: Results of the Prevalence Round. How Could We Further Improve the Gilteritinib Maintenance After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in FLT3-Mutated AML? Reply to S. Fuji.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1