Impact of osteoporosis on overall survival following endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.034
Hirotsugu Ozawa, Takao Ohki, Kota Shukuzawa, Koki Nakamura, Ryo Nishide, Kentaro Kasa, Hikaru Nakagawa, Miyo Shirouzu, Makiko Omori, Soichiro Fukushima
{"title":"Impact of osteoporosis on overall survival following endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms.","authors":"Hirotsugu Ozawa, Takao Ohki, Kota Shukuzawa, Koki Nakamura, Ryo Nishide, Kentaro Kasa, Hikaru Nakagawa, Miyo Shirouzu, Makiko Omori, Soichiro Fukushima","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of osteoporosis on overall survival following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study on 172 patients who had undergone primary EVAR for AAA between 2016 and 2018. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by measuring the Hounsfield units (HUs) of the 11th thoracic vertebra on preoperative computed tomography; a BMD value of <110 HU was considered osteoporosis. All patients were divided into those with osteoporosis and those without osteoporosis, and long-term outcomes were compared. In addition, hazard ratios of each variable for all-cause mortality were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 172 patients were divided into two groups: 72 patients (41.9%) with osteoporosis and 100 patients (58.1%) without osteoporosis. The mean age was older and the mean BMD was lower in patients with osteoporosis than patients without osteoporosis (mean, 79.2 ± 7.2 years vs 75.0 ± 8.7 years, respectively; P < .05; 78.1 ± 26.7 HU vs 155.1 ± 36.3 HU, respectively; P < .05). During the median follow-up period of 68 months, overall survival was significantly lower in patients with osteoporosis than patients without osteoporosis (osteoporosis: 63.9% and 36.7% at 5 years and 7 years; nonosteoporosis: 83.8% and 74.6% at 5 years and 7 years, respectively; log-rank P < .05); freedom from aneurysm-related mortality did not differ significantly between groups (osteoporosis: 94.3% and 89.0% at 5 years and 7 years; nonosteoporosis: 100.0% and 96.7% at 5 years and 7 years, respectively; log-rank P = .078). In a multivariate analysis for overall survival after EVAR, coexistence of osteoporosis was found to be an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.06; P < .05), as well as variables including age, statin use, sarcopenia, and aneurysm diameter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with osteoporosis showed a higher all-cause mortality after EVAR than patients without osteoporosis. We believe that comorbidity of osteoporosis may be useful in estimating the life expectancy of patients with AAA.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"149-157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of osteoporosis on overall survival following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study on 172 patients who had undergone primary EVAR for AAA between 2016 and 2018. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by measuring the Hounsfield units (HUs) of the 11th thoracic vertebra on preoperative computed tomography; a BMD value of <110 HU was considered osteoporosis. All patients were divided into those with osteoporosis and those without osteoporosis, and long-term outcomes were compared. In addition, hazard ratios of each variable for all-cause mortality were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results: All 172 patients were divided into two groups: 72 patients (41.9%) with osteoporosis and 100 patients (58.1%) without osteoporosis. The mean age was older and the mean BMD was lower in patients with osteoporosis than patients without osteoporosis (mean, 79.2 ± 7.2 years vs 75.0 ± 8.7 years, respectively; P < .05; 78.1 ± 26.7 HU vs 155.1 ± 36.3 HU, respectively; P < .05). During the median follow-up period of 68 months, overall survival was significantly lower in patients with osteoporosis than patients without osteoporosis (osteoporosis: 63.9% and 36.7% at 5 years and 7 years; nonosteoporosis: 83.8% and 74.6% at 5 years and 7 years, respectively; log-rank P < .05); freedom from aneurysm-related mortality did not differ significantly between groups (osteoporosis: 94.3% and 89.0% at 5 years and 7 years; nonosteoporosis: 100.0% and 96.7% at 5 years and 7 years, respectively; log-rank P = .078). In a multivariate analysis for overall survival after EVAR, coexistence of osteoporosis was found to be an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.06; P < .05), as well as variables including age, statin use, sarcopenia, and aneurysm diameter.

Conclusions: Patients with osteoporosis showed a higher all-cause mortality after EVAR than patients without osteoporosis. We believe that comorbidity of osteoporosis may be useful in estimating the life expectancy of patients with AAA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨质疏松症对腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后总存活率的影响。
目的评估骨质疏松症对腹主动脉瘤(AAA)血管内动脉瘤修补术(EVAR)后总生存期的影响:这是一项回顾性单中心队列研究,研究对象是2016年至2018年期间因AAA接受初级EVAR的172名患者。通过测量术前计算机断层扫描中第11胸椎的Hounsfield单位(HUs)来评估骨矿密度(BMD);BMD值为结果:所有 172 例患者被分为两组:72 例(41.9%)骨质疏松症患者和 100 例(58.1%)无骨质疏松症患者。与非骨质疏松症患者相比,骨质疏松症患者的平均年龄更高,平均 BMD 值更低(平均值±标准差 [SD] 分别为 79.2 ± 7.2 岁 vs 75.0 ± 8.7 岁;P < 0.05;78.1 ± 26.7 vs 155.1 ± 36.3 HU;P < 0.05)。中位随访期为 68 个月,骨质疏松症患者的总生存率明显低于非骨质疏松症患者(骨质疏松症:5 年和 7 年分别为 63.9% 和 36.7%;非骨质疏松症:5 年和 7 年分别为 83.8% 和 74.6%;对数秩 P < 0.05);各组间动脉瘤相关死亡率无显著差异(骨质疏松症:5 年和 7 年分别为 94.3% 和 89.0%;非骨质疏松症:5 年和 7 年分别为 100.0% 和 96.7%;对数秩 P = 0.078)。在EVAR术后总生存率的多变量分析中,发现合并骨质疏松症是全因死亡率的独立风险因素(危险比为1.76,95%置信区间为1.01-3.06;P<0.05),其他变量包括年龄、他汀类药物的使用、肌肉疏松症和动脉瘤直径:结论:与无骨质疏松症的患者相比,骨质疏松症患者在EVAR术后的全因死亡率更高。我们认为,合并骨质疏松症可能有助于估计 AAA 患者的预期寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: Methodology is important. Bending the curve for better EVAR evidence and better EVAR outcomes. Built to last? Reply: Clinical heterogenicity highlights the need for further research. Safe use of popliteal artery access in the office-based laboratory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1