Popliteal access for iliofemoral occlusive disease in the office-based catheter laboratory.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.055
Hani Shennib, Emily Teribery, Amanda Evans, Victor Huerta
{"title":"Popliteal access for iliofemoral occlusive disease in the office-based catheter laboratory.","authors":"Hani Shennib, Emily Teribery, Amanda Evans, Victor Huerta","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Popliteal access as an alternative to conventional femoral access has not been reported in the office-based catheter laboratory setting (OBL) and may be perceived to have higher risks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of popliteal access for the endovascular treatment of iliofemoral arterial occlusive disease in an OBL setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2018 to October 2023, a total of 1408 interventions for peripheral artery disease were performed in our OBL. A cohort of 27 popliteal access consecutive procedures for femoral and iliac artery occlusions were studied. All interventions were done using a micropuncture needle under ultrasound guidance. All patients were discharged 1 hour after completion of the procedure. Indications for popliteal access were presence of aortoiliac stent grafts, aortobifemoral or aortoiliac bypasses, difficult contralateral or antegrade femoral access, and flush superficial femoral artery occlusions. Procedures were determined to be successful upon complete resolution of the target lesions and safety was measured perioperatively and at 90 days. Patency was determined clinically, by arterial duplex examination, and by need for reintervention for ≤2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We performed 27 popliteal access procedures in 25 patients (21 complete femoral artery occlusions, 6 severe stenosis). Iliac disease was present in nine. Indications for popliteal access were existing aortoiliac stent graft in 11, aortobifemiliac bypass in 4, noncrossable iliac occlusions in 3, failed antegrade femoral access in 4, flush superficial femoral artery occlusion in 3, and bilateral common femoral artery disease precluding access in 2. Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus classification preoperatively was B, 4; C, 4; and D, 19. Treatments included atherectomy/balloon angioplasty and stent in 12, balloon angioplasty and stenting in 4, atherectomy/balloon angioplasty in 5, and balloon angioplasty alone in 6. Successful opening of occlusions occurred in 25 of 27 patients (92.5%). No complications or major adverse cardiac events occurred, except one asymptomatic small popliteal arteriovenous fistula. Of the 25 successful procedures, the duplex patency at 3, 6, and 12 months was 19/20 (95%), 11/15 (69.3%), and 11/13 (61%). Rutherford Classification improved from a preoperative value of >4 in 24 of 27 (89%) to a postoperative value of <2 at 1 month in 23 of 23 (100%), at 3 months in 19 of 20 (95%), at 6 months in 11 of 15 (69.3%), and at 12 months in 11 of 13 (61%). Freedom from reintervention at 3 months occurred in 19 of 20 (95%), at 6 months in 13 of 15 (86%), and at 12 months in 12 of 13 (79%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Popliteal artery access for complex iliofemoral disease is safe and effective and should be considered as a valid alternative option in the OBL setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"165-171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Popliteal access as an alternative to conventional femoral access has not been reported in the office-based catheter laboratory setting (OBL) and may be perceived to have higher risks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of popliteal access for the endovascular treatment of iliofemoral arterial occlusive disease in an OBL setting.

Methods: From October 2018 to October 2023, a total of 1408 interventions for peripheral artery disease were performed in our OBL. A cohort of 27 popliteal access consecutive procedures for femoral and iliac artery occlusions were studied. All interventions were done using a micropuncture needle under ultrasound guidance. All patients were discharged 1 hour after completion of the procedure. Indications for popliteal access were presence of aortoiliac stent grafts, aortobifemoral or aortoiliac bypasses, difficult contralateral or antegrade femoral access, and flush superficial femoral artery occlusions. Procedures were determined to be successful upon complete resolution of the target lesions and safety was measured perioperatively and at 90 days. Patency was determined clinically, by arterial duplex examination, and by need for reintervention for ≤2 years.

Results: We performed 27 popliteal access procedures in 25 patients (21 complete femoral artery occlusions, 6 severe stenosis). Iliac disease was present in nine. Indications for popliteal access were existing aortoiliac stent graft in 11, aortobifemiliac bypass in 4, noncrossable iliac occlusions in 3, failed antegrade femoral access in 4, flush superficial femoral artery occlusion in 3, and bilateral common femoral artery disease precluding access in 2. Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus classification preoperatively was B, 4; C, 4; and D, 19. Treatments included atherectomy/balloon angioplasty and stent in 12, balloon angioplasty and stenting in 4, atherectomy/balloon angioplasty in 5, and balloon angioplasty alone in 6. Successful opening of occlusions occurred in 25 of 27 patients (92.5%). No complications or major adverse cardiac events occurred, except one asymptomatic small popliteal arteriovenous fistula. Of the 25 successful procedures, the duplex patency at 3, 6, and 12 months was 19/20 (95%), 11/15 (69.3%), and 11/13 (61%). Rutherford Classification improved from a preoperative value of >4 in 24 of 27 (89%) to a postoperative value of <2 at 1 month in 23 of 23 (100%), at 3 months in 19 of 20 (95%), at 6 months in 11 of 15 (69.3%), and at 12 months in 11 of 13 (61%). Freedom from reintervention at 3 months occurred in 19 of 20 (95%), at 6 months in 13 of 15 (86%), and at 12 months in 12 of 13 (79%).

Conclusions: Popliteal artery access for complex iliofemoral disease is safe and effective and should be considered as a valid alternative option in the OBL setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在办公室导管实验室为髂股闭塞性疾病进行腘窝入路手术
目的:在诊室导管实验室(OBL)环境中,腘动脉入路(PA)作为传统股动脉入路的替代方法尚未见报道,而且可能被认为风险较高。本研究旨在评估腘动脉入路在 OBL 环境下用于髂股动脉闭塞性疾病血管内治疗的安全性和有效性:从2018年10月至2023年10月,我们的OBL共进行了1408例PAD介入治疗。研究了27例腘动脉入路股动脉和髂动脉闭塞的连续手术。所有介入手术均在超声引导下使用微型穿刺针进行。所有患者均在手术完成 1 小时后出院。腘动脉入路的指征包括:存在主动脉髂动脉支架/移植物、主动脉-双股动脉或主动脉髂动脉旁路、对侧或股动脉前行入路困难,以及股浅动脉(SFA)齐平闭塞。手术成功与否取决于目标病灶是否完全消退,安全性则取决于围手术期和 90 天后的测量结果。结果:25 名患者接受了 27 例腘动脉入路手术(21 例股动脉完全闭塞,6 例严重狭窄)。腘动脉入路手术的适应症包括:现有主动脉髂动脉支架移植11例、主动脉-双髂旁路移植4例、不可穿越的髂动脉闭塞3例、股动脉前行入路失败4例、SFA齐平闭塞3例、双侧股总动脉疾病导致入路受阻2例。术前TASC为B:4,C:4,D:19。治疗包括动脉粥样硬化切除术/球囊血管成形术(BA)和支架12例、BA和支架4例、动脉粥样硬化切除术/BA 5例、单纯BA 6例。25/27(92.5%)例患者成功打通了闭塞。除 1 例无症状的腘窝小房室瘘外,未出现并发症或重大心脏不良事件 (MACE)。在 25 例成功手术中,3、6 和 12 个月的双向通畅率分别为 19/20(95%)、11/15(69.3%)和 11/13(61%)。卢瑟福分级从术前 > 4(24/27,89%)提高到术后 < 2(1 个月:23/23,100%);3 个月:19/20,95%;6 个月:11/15,69.3%;12 个月:11/13,61%)。19/20(95%)、13/15(86%)和12/13(79%)的患者在3个月、6个月、12个月后无须再次介入治疗:腘动脉入路治疗复杂的髂股动脉疾病安全有效,应被视为OBL治疗的有效替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
The great gender dilemma in complex aortic repair: Why do women fare worse with FEVAR? Controversies in the management strategy for symptomatic chronic internal carotid artery occlusion. Endovascular strategies for the short distance between the lowest renal artery and aortic bifurcation. How do we afford the BEST care for females with chronic limb-threatening ischemia? How should failed infrarenal endovascular aortic repair with a short renal artery to bifurcation distance be managed?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1