Building supportive networks: Insights from a division mentorship workshop

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1111/medu.15517
Tracy S. Tylee, Farah N. Khan, Tiffany Nguyen, Radhika R. Narla
{"title":"Building supportive networks: Insights from a division mentorship workshop","authors":"Tracy S. Tylee,&nbsp;Farah N. Khan,&nbsp;Tiffany Nguyen,&nbsp;Radhika R. Narla","doi":"10.1111/medu.15517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past 4 years, our institution has observed consistently lower scores on the ACGME Well-Being Surveys among both our fellows and faculty compared to national averages. This trend reflects a widespread sense of disengagement and dissatisfaction with work for both trainees and faculty. We attribute a portion of this distress to the physical spread of our division across campuses and the growing reliance on virtual platforms for communication and collaboration, limiting opportunities for engagement alongside our colleagues. Consequently, fostering mentorship and support networks within our community has been challenging, leading to feelings of isolation and discontent among fellows and faculty.</p><p>Developing mentorship programmes is one way to improve the support network for fellows and faculty and can improve resiliency, increase job satisfaction and decrease the risk of burnout.\n* To support mentorship efforts, we developed a half day Mentorship Retreat for fellows and core clinical faculty to come together and facilitate networking opportunities and deepen mentor–mentee connections.</p><p>All clinical fellows (<i>n</i> = 7) and six core teaching faculty participated in the retreat. Attendees completed pre-surveys to identify their goals for the session and post-surveys to assess satisfaction. The most common goals reported by fellows were professional development, while faculty aimed to become more effective and supportive mentors. The retreat was highly rated by fellows and faculty, who rated it as 4.75 and 4.6 out of 5, respectively, on the post evaluation surveys. The topics were deemed highly pertinent to the career development of the fellows. Faculty members unanimously agreed that their participation was crucial for the event's success and built community, with many suggesting that it should be an annual event.</p><p>There was palpable enthusiasm and engagement observed throughout the workshop. Fellows valued the opportunity to receive personalised guidance on crafting CVs and developing ILPs, while faculty members appreciated the chance to share their experiences and insights into effective mentorship practices. The mentor–mentee presentation underscored the need to develop relationships with role models, network using mosaic mentorship, and encouraged introspection and critical information gathering, which generated a stimulating discussion, as faculty shared their experiences with mentorship. Surprisingly, junior faculty attendees of the workshop conveyed profound gratitude for these mentorship dialogues. This highlighted the need for junior clinical faculty and clinician educators to also have more structured professional development.</p><p>Encouraged by the positive response, we plan to continue with the workshop annually and consider expansion of platforms that facilitate the cultivation of relationships for sponsorship, offer guidance in navigating clinical career paths and provide support with the academic promotions process for junior faculty.</p><p><b>Tracy S. Tylee:</b> Conceptualization; writing—review and editing; writing—original draft. <b>Farah N. Khan:</b> Conceptualization; writing—review and editing; writing—original draft. <b>Tiffany Nguyen:</b> Conceptualization; writing—review and editing; writing—original draft. <b>Radhika R. Narla:</b> Conceptualization; writing—review and editing; writing—original draft.</p><p>None of the authors have any conflict of interest to report.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"58 11","pages":"1401-1402"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15517","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15517","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past 4 years, our institution has observed consistently lower scores on the ACGME Well-Being Surveys among both our fellows and faculty compared to national averages. This trend reflects a widespread sense of disengagement and dissatisfaction with work for both trainees and faculty. We attribute a portion of this distress to the physical spread of our division across campuses and the growing reliance on virtual platforms for communication and collaboration, limiting opportunities for engagement alongside our colleagues. Consequently, fostering mentorship and support networks within our community has been challenging, leading to feelings of isolation and discontent among fellows and faculty.

Developing mentorship programmes is one way to improve the support network for fellows and faculty and can improve resiliency, increase job satisfaction and decrease the risk of burnout. * To support mentorship efforts, we developed a half day Mentorship Retreat for fellows and core clinical faculty to come together and facilitate networking opportunities and deepen mentor–mentee connections.

All clinical fellows (n = 7) and six core teaching faculty participated in the retreat. Attendees completed pre-surveys to identify their goals for the session and post-surveys to assess satisfaction. The most common goals reported by fellows were professional development, while faculty aimed to become more effective and supportive mentors. The retreat was highly rated by fellows and faculty, who rated it as 4.75 and 4.6 out of 5, respectively, on the post evaluation surveys. The topics were deemed highly pertinent to the career development of the fellows. Faculty members unanimously agreed that their participation was crucial for the event's success and built community, with many suggesting that it should be an annual event.

There was palpable enthusiasm and engagement observed throughout the workshop. Fellows valued the opportunity to receive personalised guidance on crafting CVs and developing ILPs, while faculty members appreciated the chance to share their experiences and insights into effective mentorship practices. The mentor–mentee presentation underscored the need to develop relationships with role models, network using mosaic mentorship, and encouraged introspection and critical information gathering, which generated a stimulating discussion, as faculty shared their experiences with mentorship. Surprisingly, junior faculty attendees of the workshop conveyed profound gratitude for these mentorship dialogues. This highlighted the need for junior clinical faculty and clinician educators to also have more structured professional development.

Encouraged by the positive response, we plan to continue with the workshop annually and consider expansion of platforms that facilitate the cultivation of relationships for sponsorship, offer guidance in navigating clinical career paths and provide support with the academic promotions process for junior faculty.

Tracy S. Tylee: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing; writing—original draft. Farah N. Khan: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing; writing—original draft. Tiffany Nguyen: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing; writing—original draft. Radhika R. Narla: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing; writing—original draft.

None of the authors have any conflict of interest to report.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立支持性网络:分部导师研讨会的启示。
在过去 4 年中,本机构发现,与全国平均水平相比,我们的学员和教职员工在 ACGME 幸福感调查中的得分一直较低。这一趋势反映了学员和教职员工对工作的普遍脱离感和不满情绪。我们认为,造成这种困扰的部分原因是,我们的部门分布在各个校区,而且越来越依赖虚拟平台进行交流与合作,从而限制了与同事们一起工作的机会。因此,在我们的社区内培养导师和支持网络一直是个挑战,导致研究员和教职员工感到孤立和不满。制定导师计划是改善研究员和教职员工支持网络的一种方法,可以提高复原力、增加工作满意度并降低倦怠风险。* 为了支持导师制工作,我们为研究员和核心临床教师举办了为期半天的导师制务虚会,以促进交流机会,加深导师与被指导者之间的联系。所有临床研究员(n = 7)和六名核心教学教师参加了务虚会。所有临床研究员(7 人)和 6 名核心教学人员参加了务虚会。与会者完成了会前调查,以确定他们的会议目标,并完成了会后调查,以评估满意度。研究员们报告的最常见目标是专业发展,而教师们的目标则是成为更有效、更具支持性的导师。研究员和教职员工对务虚会给予了高度评价,他们在会后评估调查中的评分分别为 4.75 分和 4.6 分(满分 5 分)。他们认为务虚会的主题与研究员的职业发展高度相关。教员们一致认为,他们的参与对于活动的成功和社区的建立至关重要,许多教员建议每年举办一次这样的活动。研究员们非常珍惜这次机会,能够在撰写个人简历和制定个人学习规划(ILP)方面获得个性化指导,而教员们则非常珍惜这次机会,能够分享他们在有效指导实践方面的经验和见解。导师与被指导者的发言强调了与榜样发展关系的必要性,利用镶嵌式指导建立网络,鼓励反思和收集关键信息,这引发了一场激励人心的讨论,教师们分享了他们的指导经验。令人惊讶的是,参加研讨会的青年教师对这些导师对话深表感谢。受到积极反响的鼓舞,我们计划继续每年举办研讨会,并考虑扩展平台,以促进培养赞助关系,为临床职业道路导航提供指导,并为青年教师的学术晋升过程提供支持:构思;撰写-审阅和编辑;撰写-原稿。Farah N. Khan:构思;写作-审阅和编辑;写作-原稿。Tiffany Nguyen:构思;写作-审阅和编辑;写作-原稿。Radhika R. Narla:构思;撰写-审阅和编辑;撰写-原稿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
January in this issue. Culture and context in Interprofessional education: Expectations in Australia and Japan. Establishing new medical schools in diverse contexts: A novel conceptual framework for success. What's your experience?: A duoethnographic dialogue to advance disability inclusion in medical education. Bridging the digital divide: Promoting equal access to online learning for health professions in an unequal world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1