Sildenafil's effectiveness in the primary coronary slow flow phenomenon: a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Open Heart Pub Date : 2024-08-25 DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-002772
Abbas Andishmand, Seyedmostafa Seyedhosseini, Seyedeh Mahdieh Namayandeh, Elnaz Adelzadeh, Amin Entezari, Seyed Reza Mirjalili
{"title":"Sildenafil's effectiveness in the primary coronary slow flow phenomenon: a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Abbas Andishmand, Seyedmostafa Seyedhosseini, Seyedeh Mahdieh Namayandeh, Elnaz Adelzadeh, Amin Entezari, Seyed Reza Mirjalili","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>On the one hand, the primary coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP) can cause recurrence of chest pain, prompting medical examinations and further healthcare costs, while on the other hand, it can lead to myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Nevertheless, there is not any agreement on the optimal treatment for primary CSFP, so we decided to examine the effectiveness of sildenafil in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pilot study is a 12-week, triple-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial for receiving either 50 mg daily oral sildenafil or placebo. Twenty eligible patients aged 30-70 years from a tertiary hospital in Yazd were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to two groups. The primary outcomes were the alterations in functional capacity (metabolic equivalents, METs), Duke treadmill score (DTS) and angina severity (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class). The study protocol registration code is IRCT20220223054103N1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The angina severity in the Sildenafil group improved, with all receivers achieving a state of being asymptomatic during regular physical activity (CCS I). Whereas just 40% of the recipients in the placebo group achieved the same level of improvement (p=0.011). Mean METs at baseline were 9.9 (SD: 3.1) and at week 12 were 13.1 (SD: 3.3) for sildenafil and 9.56 (SD: 2.1) and 9.63 (SD: 2.4) for placebo (difference favouring sildenafil with a median increase of 3.1 (IQR: 1.1 to 4.1, p=0.008)). Median DTS scores at baseline were 3 (IQR: 0 to 9) and at week 12 were 9.5 (IQR: 7.75 to 15) for sildenafil and 7 (IQR: -1.5 to 9.25) and 8 (IQR: 1.5 to 11.25) for placebo (difference favouring sildenafil with a median increase of 5.5 (IQR: 1 to 9.2, p=0.01)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We suggest that a daily low dose of sildenafil could be a valuable therapeutic option for primary CSFP.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>IRCT20220223054103N1.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: On the one hand, the primary coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP) can cause recurrence of chest pain, prompting medical examinations and further healthcare costs, while on the other hand, it can lead to myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Nevertheless, there is not any agreement on the optimal treatment for primary CSFP, so we decided to examine the effectiveness of sildenafil in this context.

Methods: This pilot study is a 12-week, triple-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial for receiving either 50 mg daily oral sildenafil or placebo. Twenty eligible patients aged 30-70 years from a tertiary hospital in Yazd were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to two groups. The primary outcomes were the alterations in functional capacity (metabolic equivalents, METs), Duke treadmill score (DTS) and angina severity (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class). The study protocol registration code is IRCT20220223054103N1.

Results: The angina severity in the Sildenafil group improved, with all receivers achieving a state of being asymptomatic during regular physical activity (CCS I). Whereas just 40% of the recipients in the placebo group achieved the same level of improvement (p=0.011). Mean METs at baseline were 9.9 (SD: 3.1) and at week 12 were 13.1 (SD: 3.3) for sildenafil and 9.56 (SD: 2.1) and 9.63 (SD: 2.4) for placebo (difference favouring sildenafil with a median increase of 3.1 (IQR: 1.1 to 4.1, p=0.008)). Median DTS scores at baseline were 3 (IQR: 0 to 9) and at week 12 were 9.5 (IQR: 7.75 to 15) for sildenafil and 7 (IQR: -1.5 to 9.25) and 8 (IQR: 1.5 to 11.25) for placebo (difference favouring sildenafil with a median increase of 5.5 (IQR: 1 to 9.2, p=0.01)).

Conclusions: We suggest that a daily low dose of sildenafil could be a valuable therapeutic option for primary CSFP.

Trial registration number: IRCT20220223054103N1.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西地那非对原发性冠状动脉血流缓慢现象的疗效:随机对照临床试验。
背景:一方面,原发性冠状动脉慢血流现象(CSFP)可导致胸痛复发,从而引发医疗检查和进一步的医疗费用;另一方面,它可导致心肌梗死、室性心律失常和心脏性猝死。然而,对于原发性 CSFP 的最佳治疗方法还没有达成一致意见,因此我们决定研究西地那非在这方面的有效性:这项试点研究是一项为期 12 周的三盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,研究对象为每天口服 50 毫克西地那非或安慰剂的患者。来自亚兹德一家三级医院的 20 名符合条件的 30-70 岁患者按 1:1 的比例随机分配到两组。主要结果是功能能力(代谢当量,METs)、杜克跑步机评分(DTS)和心绞痛严重程度(加拿大心血管协会(CCS)分级)的变化。研究方案注册代码为 IRCT20220223054103N1:结果:西地那非组的心绞痛严重程度有所改善,所有受试者在常规体力活动中都达到了无症状状态(CCS I)。而安慰剂组仅有 40% 的受试者达到了同样的改善水平(P=0.011)。西地那非基线时的平均 MET 为 9.9(标清:3.1),第 12 周时的平均 MET 为 13.1(标清:3.3),安慰剂组分别为 9.56(标清:2.1)和 9.63(标清:2.4)(中位数增加 3.1(IQR:1.1 至 4.1,p=0.008),差异有利于西地那非)。西地那非的基线DTS评分中位数为3(IQR:0至9),第12周时为9.5(IQR:7.75至15),安慰剂为7(IQR:-1.5至9.25)和8(IQR:1.5至11.25)(西地那非的评分中位数增加了5.5(IQR:1至9.2,p=0.01),差异较大):我们认为,每日服用小剂量西地那非可能是治疗原发性CSFP的重要选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
期刊最新文献
Optimal timing of oral anticoagulation initiation in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review. Characterisation of patients who develop atrial fibrillation-induced cardiomyopathy. Partnering RemoTe monitoring of Implanted Cardiac devices with Intelligent PATient Engagement - PARTICIPATE trial: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Heart valve clinics: an expanding role for the clinical scientist's validation of a framework for competency and certification. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy due to truncating variants in myosin binding protein C: a Spanish cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1