Effect of robotic-assisted gait training program on spatiotemporal gait parameters for ambulatory children with cerebral palsy: A randomized control trial.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/NRE-240156
Maha F Algabbani, Jaber Mohammed Fagehi, Muzaynah Aljosh, Manal Bawazeer, Mishal M Aldaihan, Tariq A Abdulrahman, Adel A Alhusaini
{"title":"Effect of robotic-assisted gait training program on spatiotemporal gait parameters for ambulatory children with cerebral palsy: A randomized control trial.","authors":"Maha F Algabbani, Jaber Mohammed Fagehi, Muzaynah Aljosh, Manal Bawazeer, Mishal M Aldaihan, Tariq A Abdulrahman, Adel A Alhusaini","doi":"10.3233/NRE-240156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gait training programs are commonly used to improve gait in children with cerebral palsy (CP).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compared the effects of robotic-gait assistant training (RAGT) and conventional body weight support treadmill training (CBWSTT) on gait parameters among ambulatory children with CP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study is a randomized controlled trial of 36 children (17 in the RAGT group and 19 in the CBWSTT group) aged 5 to 14. Gait training involved 30-to 35-minute sessions three times per week over eight weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mixed ANCOVA showed no main effect of time or group on all gait parameters (P > .05). Gross motor function measure dimensions D (GMFM D) and E (GMFM E) show main effects on step width. Stride length, step length, speed, swing phase, and double support phase interacted with GMFM D and E. There was a negative correlation between motor function level and the change from baseline. Children with lower motor function show a greater change from baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no significant differences between CBWSTT and RAGT for children with CP; however, with gait training interventions, the level of motor function should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"55 1","pages":"127-136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-240156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gait training programs are commonly used to improve gait in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Objective: To compared the effects of robotic-gait assistant training (RAGT) and conventional body weight support treadmill training (CBWSTT) on gait parameters among ambulatory children with CP.

Methods: The study is a randomized controlled trial of 36 children (17 in the RAGT group and 19 in the CBWSTT group) aged 5 to 14. Gait training involved 30-to 35-minute sessions three times per week over eight weeks.

Results: Mixed ANCOVA showed no main effect of time or group on all gait parameters (P > .05). Gross motor function measure dimensions D (GMFM D) and E (GMFM E) show main effects on step width. Stride length, step length, speed, swing phase, and double support phase interacted with GMFM D and E. There was a negative correlation between motor function level and the change from baseline. Children with lower motor function show a greater change from baseline.

Conclusion: There were no significant differences between CBWSTT and RAGT for children with CP; however, with gait training interventions, the level of motor function should be considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助步态训练计划对行走不便的脑瘫儿童时空步态参数的影响:随机对照试验
背景:步态训练是改善脑瘫儿童步态的常用方法:步态训练是改善脑瘫儿童步态的常用方法:比较机器人步态辅助训练(RAGT)和传统体重支撑跑步机训练(CBWSTT)对可活动的 CP 儿童步态参数的影响:该研究是一项随机对照试验,共有 36 名 5 至 14 岁的儿童参加(机器人步态辅助训练组 17 人,CBWSTT 组 19 人)。步态训练包括 30 至 35 分钟的课程,每周三次,为期八周:混合方差分析显示,时间或组别对所有步态参数均无主效应(P > .05)。粗大运动功能测量维度 D(GMFM D)和 E(GMFM E)显示了对步幅的主效应。步长、步幅、速度、摆动阶段和双支撑阶段与 GMFM D 和 E 相互影响。运动功能较低的儿童与基线相比变化更大:结论:CBWSTT 和 RAGT 对 CP 儿童没有明显差异;但是,在进行步态训练干预时,应考虑运动功能水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Effects of Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review. Effects of an 8-Week Combined Aerobic-Resistance Training on Motor Function, Functional Mobility, and Metabolic Parameters in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Controlled Study. Retrospective Study on the Effects of Intensive Speech Therapy Combined with Two Courses of High-Frequency rTMS on Language Function in Patients with Aphasia. Predictors of Anxiety Symptoms Over the 10 Years After TBI in Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders: A Model System Study. Home-Based Telerehabilitation for Core Stability in Hereditary Ataxia: Feasibility and Preliminary Effects of a Pilot RCT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1